Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
173 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
75 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
119 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
51 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
70 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
30 FPS
10.2ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 70,163
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 15,852

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 40 47 70
1440p QHD 51 67 80 119
1080p Full HD 75 98 116 173

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Low 173
1920x1080 Medium 116
1920x1080 Ultra 75
2560x1440 High 67
2560x1440 Low 119
2560x1440 Medium 80
2560x1440 Ultra 51
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Low 70
3840x2160 Medium 47
3840x2160 Ultra 30

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination delivers a robust Rust experience, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and presets. Benchmark data shows the system is fully capable at 1080p, comfortably playable at 1440p, and limited to lower settings at 4K. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares it to nearby hardware, and provides clear guidance on optimal settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU in this pairing each sit near specific rivals based on aggregate benchmark scores. For the Intel Core i7-14700KF, the data places it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70,163. The closest alternatives are the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, which scores 69,996 (a 0.2% difference), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69,875 (0.4% difference). The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515, trailing by 0.9%, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads slightly with 70,879, a 1% margin. In practical terms, swapping to any of these processors would yield nearly identical frame rates in Rust, as the performance gap is within a single percentage point.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 holds the 58th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 15,852. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 370X, which scores 15,862 (a 0.1% difference, effectively a tie). The AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16,014 (1% higher), while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 trails at 15,679 (1.1% lower). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads this group with 16,129, a 1.7% advantage. For Rust specifically, any of these GPUs would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates, meaning the choice between them would not meaningfully alter the measured results presented here.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 1080p Ultra is 75 FPS, which clears the playable threshold of 60 FPS. This is the highest preset tested at this resolution, and it remains fully playable.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: The High preset delivers an average of 67 FPS at 1440p. While Low and Medium also exceed 60 FPS (119 and 80 FPS respectively), High offers the best visual quality while staying above the threshold. Ultra falls short at 51 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combination?

A: Only at Low settings. The 4K Low preset averages 70 FPS, while Medium drops to 47 FPS and High falls to 40 FPS. Ultra is not playable at 30 FPS. Users targeting 4K must accept significant visual compromises.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70,163, which is 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X’s 69,515. This places them within a negligible performance delta, making them effectively interchangeable for gaming workloads.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1920x1080?

A: The Low preset averages 173 FPS, while Ultra averages 75 FPS. This represents a 98 FPS drop when moving from the lowest to the highest preset, a substantial 56.6% reduction in performance.

Q: Does the GPU bottleneck the CPU at any resolution?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 4K, the average frame rate drops by roughly half compared to 1080p across presets, while the CPU’s performance remains constant. The 4K Ultra result of 30 FPS indicates the GPU is the primary constraint.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the workload shifts between CPU and GPU as resolution and settings change. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 173 FPS on Low, 116 FPS on Medium, 98 FPS on High, and 75 FPS on Ultra. This wide spread indicates that the GPU is handling the bulk of the rendering work, as lowering settings directly translates to higher frame rates. The CPU, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is sufficient to feed the GPU at these resolutions, as evidenced by the fact that even the most demanding preset stays above 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop to 119 FPS on Low, 80 FPS on Medium, 67 FPS on High, and 51 FPS on Ultra. The pattern is consistent: each preset step reduces performance by roughly 30-40%, which is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU continues to keep up, as the drop from 1080p to 1440p is proportional to the increase in pixel count rather than a sudden collapse.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become stark. Low settings average 70 FPS, but Medium falls to 47 FPS, High to 40 FPS, and Ultra to 30 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 23 FPS, which is larger than the 21 FPS gap between Low and Medium at 1440p, suggesting the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute resources are being saturated. The RX 7700’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are not enough to sustain high preset quality at this pixel density. The CPU’s role diminishes at 4K, as the frame rate is entirely dictated by the GPU’s rendering throughput.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust at playable frame rates across all three tested resolutions, though the quality ceiling varies significantly. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—average above 60 FPS, with Ultra delivering 75 FPS. This is a fully playable experience at maximum settings. At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 67 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, and both Low (119 FPS) and Medium (80 FPS) also qualify. Ultra falls short at 51 FPS, so it is not recommended for 1440p gaming. At 3840x2160, only Low settings average above 60 FPS at 70 FPS. Medium (47 FPS), High (40 FPS), and Ultra (30 FPS) all fail to reach the playable threshold. The verdict is clear: this combination excels at 1080p, performs well at 1440p with High settings, and requires Low settings for 4K playability.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the benchmark results show consistent performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 173 FPS, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. Medium settings average 116 FPS, with a minimum of 99 FPS and a maximum of 133 FPS. High settings average 98 FPS, while Ultra settings average 75 FPS. The data indicates a smooth scaling curve, with each preset tier reducing performance by approximately 20-30 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down proportionally. Low settings average 119 FPS, Medium averages 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS and maximum of 92 FPS, High averages 67 FPS, and Ultra averages 51 FPS. The minimum recorded value at Medium (68 FPS) still exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating stable performance even during demanding scenes.

At 3840x2160, the results show the GPU’s limits. Low settings average 70 FPS, Medium averages 47 FPS with a minimum of 40 FPS and maximum of 54 FPS, High averages 40 FPS, and Ultra averages 30 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 40 FPS is notably below the playable threshold, which means frame drops will be noticeable during intense gameplay. The overall pattern confirms that 4K is only viable at Low settings, and even then, the margin above 60 FPS is slim.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Rust, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Radeon RX 7700 ranks 1,728 out of 3,723 total combinations. This places it in the 46.4th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 54% of configurations deliver higher performance in Rust. The ranking reflects the GPU’s mid-range positioning; while the CPU is top-tier, the RX 7700’s die size and compute resources limit its ability to compete with higher-end graphics cards. The combo’s rank is consistent with its measured performance, which shows strong 1080p results but diminishing returns at higher resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, delivering an average of 75 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and provides a polished visual experience without sacrificing playability. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best choice, averaging 67 FPS. While Low (119 FPS) and Medium (80 FPS) also meet the threshold, High offers the optimal balance of visual fidelity and performance. At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only option that averages above 60 FPS, at 70 FPS. Medium (47 FPS), High (40 FPS), and Ultra (30 FPS) all fall short of the playable threshold, so users must accept reduced visuals for playable frame rates at 4K.