Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

70%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
74 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
29 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
49 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
23 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
32 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
12 FPS
22.2ms Frame Time
33ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 70,163
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 12,928

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 12 17 18 32
1440p QHD 23 27 34 49
1080p Full HD 29 45 50 74

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 45
1920x1080 Low 74
1920x1080 Medium 50
1920x1080 Ultra 29
2560x1440 High 27
2560x1440 Low 49
2560x1440 Medium 34
2560x1440 Ultra 23
3840x2160 High 17
3840x2160 Low 32
3840x2160 Medium 18
3840x2160 Ultra 12

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1080p?

A: Yes, at 1080p with Low settings the combo averages 73.7 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. At Medium settings, the average drops to 49.5 FPS, so Low is the only playable preset at this resolution.

Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware in Rust?

A: The recorded data shows 1920x1080 is the only resolution where any settings preset reaches 60 FPS. At 2560x1440, even Low settings only average 48.5 FPS, and at 3840x2160 the highest average is 32 FPS on Low.

Q: How does the RX 580 compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RX 580 scores 12,928 in the database's average benchmark, sitting within 0.6% of the AMD Radeon 740M and 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. It is effectively performance-equivalent to those cards in general compute workloads.

Q: Is the i7-14700KF a strong CPU for gaming?

A: The CPU sits in the 94th percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 70,163. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, scores 69,515, which is 0.9% slower, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is 1% faster at 70,879.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 1440p with Low settings?

A: The measured average is 48.5 FPS at 2560x1440 on Low. This falls short of the 60 FPS playable threshold, so 1440p is not recommended for smooth gameplay with this combination.

Q: Does the GPU hold back the CPU in Rust?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 73.7 FPS, but at 1440p Low it drops to 48.5 FPS, a 34% reduction that aligns with the GPU's workload increasing rather than CPU limits.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this CPU and GPU combination at 3,433 out of 3,723 tested combos for Rust. That places it in the bottom 8% of all pairings evaluated, meaning the vast majority of tested systems deliver higher frame rates in this title. The ranking reflects the substantial gap between the CPU's capability and the GPU's age.

The i7-14700KF is a top-tier processor by any measure, sitting at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 44,167 and single-core score of 6,235 indicate exceptional headroom for modern games. The RX 580, however, ranks at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 8,813. This mismatch means the GPU becomes the bottleneck in Rust at all but the lowest settings.

The combination's low rank in this specific game is not a reflection of the CPU, but rather the GPU's inability to keep pace with the demands of Rust's rendering. The measured frame rates confirm this: even at 1080p Low, the average of 73.7 FPS is only modestly above the playable threshold, and every other preset at every resolution falls short of 60 FPS.

Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing is positioned for 1080p gaming at reduced settings. The recorded data shows no playable configuration at 1440p or 4K, which limits its usefulness for higher-resolution displays. For a game like Rust, which can be demanding on both CPU and GPU, this combo's overall rank reflects its inability to maintain high frame rates outside of the lowest quality preset at 1080p.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the i7-14700KF and the RX 580 in Rust. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium settings drops the average from 73.7 FPS to 49.5 FPS, a 33% reduction. Moving from Medium to High further drops to 45 FPS, and Ultra falls to 29.4 FPS. This scaling shows that the GPU is heavily taxed by each increase in graphical fidelity, even at the lowest resolution tested.

At 1440p, the same pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings average 48.5 FPS, Medium 34 FPS, High 26.9 FPS, and Ultra 22.9 FPS. The relative drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 53%, compared to a 60% drop at 1080p. This suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint, and the CPU's influence on frame rates diminishes.

At 4K, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting factor. Low settings average 32 FPS, Medium 17.5 FPS, High 17.3 FPS, and Ultra 11.5 FPS. The difference between Medium and High at 4K is negligible (17.5 vs 17.3 FPS), indicating that the GPU is saturated regardless of minor settings changes. The CPU's role at this resolution is nearly irrelevant, as the RX 580 cannot push enough frames to utilize the i7-14700KF's capabilities.

For Rust specifically, the CPU matters most at lower resolutions and lower settings, where the GPU can keep up. At 1080p Low, the i7-14700KF's strong single-thread performance (6,235 in Cinebench R23 single-core) likely helps maintain higher minimum frame rates in CPU-intensive scenes like base building or large player interactions. However, the recorded data shows no scenarios where the CPU becomes the primary bottleneck; the GPU consistently limits performance across all tested configurations.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but only under specific conditions. The verdict by resolution is straightforward: at 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves 60 FPS, with the best case being 32 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, the same situation applies, with Low settings reaching only 48.5 FPS. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 73.7 FPS, which clears the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Therefore, the only playable configuration is 1080p with Low settings. The database's playable settings list for 1080p includes only Low, and the best settings at that resolution is Low with an average of 73.7 FPS. This leaves no headroom for higher quality presets at 1080p, as Medium drops to 49.5 FPS, which is below the threshold.

For gamers who prioritize smooth gameplay over visual fidelity, this combo can deliver a playable experience at 1080p Low. However, the margin is thin: 73.7 FPS is only 13.7 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, and demanding scenes could push the average lower. At any higher resolution or preset, this system will struggle to maintain playable frame rates.

The RX 580's age is the primary limitation. With only 8 GB of GDDR5 memory and a 256-bit bus, it lacks the bandwidth and compute power for modern games at high settings. The i7-14700KF, by contrast, is more than capable for Rust, as evidenced by its top-tier CPU benchmarks. If the GPU were upgraded, the CPU would not be the limiting factor in this game.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database lists several GPUs that perform nearly identically to the RX 580. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile scores 12,940, which is 0.1% higher, making it a direct performance equivalent. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,986, 0.4% higher, and would deliver nearly the same frame rates in Rust. The AMD Radeon 740M scores 12,870, 0.5% lower, and the AMD FirePro W5100 scores 12,847, 0.6% lower. Any of these would produce similar results in Rust, meaning they would also only be playable at 1080p Low.

On the CPU side, the i7-14700KF's nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996, 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69,875, 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515, 0.9% lower, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70,879, 1% higher. Swapping the i7-14700KF for any of these CPUs would not meaningfully change Rust's performance, since the GPU remains the bottleneck in all tested scenarios.

For a builder considering alternatives, the practical takeaway is that the GPU choice determines playability in Rust. Pairing any of these rival CPUs with the RX 580 would yield nearly identical frame rates. Upgrading the GPU to a faster model would be the only way to unlock higher settings or resolutions, as the CPU has ample headroom.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, there is no playable setting. The highest average FPS is 32 on Low, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra all produce averages between 11.5 and 17.5 FPS, making them unplayable.

At 2560x1440, the same conclusion applies. Low settings average 48.5 FPS, which is below 60 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra range from 22.9 to 34 FPS, all far from playable.

At 1920x1080, the only playable preset is Low, with an average of 73.7 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Medium drops to 49.5 FPS, High to 45 FPS, and Ultra to 29.4 FPS, all below the threshold.

For the best visual quality while maintaining playability, the recommendation is clear: run Rust at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The 73.7 FPS average provides a reasonable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, though users should be prepared for occasional dips in heavy scenes. There is no playable configuration at higher resolutions, and even at 1080p, only the lowest quality preset delivers acceptable performance.