Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 61 | 65 | 101 |
| 1440p QHD | 73 | 101 | 115 | 172 |
| 1080p Full HD | 110 | 140 | 170 | 250 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers a robust performance profile for Rust, a survival title that scales significantly across resolution and quality settings. Measured data from the database shows this combination handles 1080p and 1440p with substantial headroom, while 4K requires careful preset selection to maintain smooth gameplay. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across all tested configurations, examines the CPU versus GPU workload distribution, and provides clear guidance on optimal settings for each resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combo covers three resolutions and four quality presets, with average frame rates recorded for each combination. At 1920x1080, the lowest tested resolution, performance is exceptionally high across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 250.3 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium yields 169.7 FPS, High drops slightly to 139.6 FPS, and Ultra maintains a strong 110.3 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p represents a drop of approximately 56% from the peak, yet even the most demanding preset clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin.
At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. The Low preset averages 171.5 FPS, which remains extremely high for a 1440p resolution. Medium settings produce 114.9 FPS, High delivers 100.8 FPS, and Ultra settles at 73.2 FPS. The deltas between presets are consistent, with each step up in quality costing roughly 20-30% of the previous frame rate. Notably, the gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 56.6 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 14.1 FPS, and between High and Ultra it narrows to 27.6 FPS.
At 3840x2160, performance becomes more constrained. The Low preset still manages a respectable 100.7 FPS, but Medium drops to 65.4 FPS, and High falls to 60.7 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K averages just 45 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold of 60 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a reduction of 55.7 FPS, representing a 55% decline from the peak. The data indicates that 4K Ultra is the only tested configuration that fails to meet the minimum playability standard.
Across all resolutions, the pattern is clear: Rust responds strongly to both resolution scaling and preset adjustments. The difference between 1080p Low and 4K Ultra is 205.3 FPS, illustrating the combined impact of pixel count and graphical fidelity. The measured data contains no minimum or maximum frame rate values, so all analysis relies solely on average FPS figures.
CPU and GPU Roles
The interaction between the Intel Core i7-14700K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER shifts depending on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance becomes the dominant factor. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2160 and multi-core score of 33440.5 indicate a processor capable of feeding frames rapidly at lower resolutions. The fact that 1080p Low reaches 250.3 FPS suggests the GPU is not the bottleneck at this level; instead, the CPU’s ability to process game logic and draw calls likely limits the ceiling.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a more prominent role. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which becomes increasingly relevant as pixel count rises. The frame rate drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low is 78.8 FPS, a reduction of 31%. This scaling indicates the GPU is handling additional pixel workload, but the CPU still has enough headroom to keep frame rates high.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 198.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are pushed to their limits. The drop from 1440p Low to 4K Low is 70.8 FPS, a 41% reduction. More telling is the preset scaling at 4K: Low to Medium costs 35.3 FPS, Medium to High costs 4.7 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 15.7 FPS. The small difference between Medium and High at 4K suggests the GPU is struggling to maintain frame rates as shader complexity increases, while the CPU has ample capacity to spare.
The data supports a clear division of labor. At 1080p and lower presets, the i7-14700K’s 20 cores and 28 threads, combined with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, provide enough throughput to keep the GPU saturated. At 4K and higher presets, the RTX 4070 SUPER’s compute resources become the limiting factor. The benchmark scores reinforce this: the CPU’s percentile ranking of 94 versus all CPUs is higher than the GPU’s percentile of 83 versus all GPUs, indicating the processor is relatively stronger in its class than the graphics card.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the goal is to identify the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear this threshold, but the Ultra preset delivers the best visual quality while still averaging 110.3 FPS. This leaves substantial headroom for demanding scenes or background activity, making Ultra the clear recommendation for 1080p gaming.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 73.2 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS target by 13.2 FPS. This is the highest quality setting that remains playable, and the margin is comfortable enough for most gameplay scenarios. The High preset at 1440p averages 100.8 FPS, but Ultra offers a meaningful visual upgrade at a cost of 27.6 FPS, which is acceptable given the still-solid frame rate.
At 3840x2160, the situation is more nuanced. The High preset averages 60.7 FPS, which barely clears the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset averages 65.4 FPS, providing a slightly larger safety margin. The Ultra preset at 45 FPS is unplayable by the standard of 60 FPS, and even Low at 100.7 FPS is technically an option but sacrifices significant visual quality. The data indicates High is the best balanced choice for 4K, as it offers the highest quality setting that still meets the playability criterion, albeit with only 0.7 FPS of headroom.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K Ultra settings?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 45 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 60.7 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 73.2 FPS, making it the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS. All four presets at this resolution are playable, but Ultra provides the best visual fidelity within the performance limit.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings?
A: At Low settings, the drop from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is 149.6 FPS (from 250.3 to 100.7). At High settings, the drop is 78.9 FPS (from 139.6 to 60.7). The percentage reduction is smaller at higher presets due to the GPU already being heavily loaded.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more critical for Rust at 1080p?
A: The data suggests the CPU plays a larger role at 1080p. The i7-14700K’s high single-core score of 2160 in Cinebench R23 helps sustain the 250.3 FPS average at Low settings, indicating the processor is capable of driving frame rates beyond what the GPU can render at this resolution.
Q: Which preset at 4K provides the best balance of quality and performance?
A: High settings at 3840x2160 average 60.7 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 65.4 FPS, offering a slightly safer margin but with lower visual quality. High is the recommended preset for maximum fidelity.
Q: Does the RTX 4070 SUPER bottleneck the i7-14700K at any resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as evidenced by the 45 FPS average at Ultra settings. At lower resolutions, the CPU has sufficient headroom, with the GPU’s 12 GB memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handling the pixel workload effectively.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700K provide context for its CPU performance. The AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69288 in average benchmark, which is 0.1% lower than the i7-14700K’s 69355 average. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, representing a 0.2% advantage. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875, which is 0.7% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, a 0.9% improvement. These deltas are all minimal, indicating that any of these processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262 in average benchmark, which is 0.1% lower than the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 43223 average. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, also 0.1% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43301, a 0.2% difference, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, which is 1% higher. These deltaPct values are negligible, meaning gamers would experience virtually identical frame rates with any of these GPUs in Rust.
The practical implication is that swapping the i7-14700K for a Ryzen 9 7950X or the RTX 4070 SUPER for an RTX 4090 Mobile would yield frame rate changes well within the margin of measurement error. The measured FPS figures would likely remain within a few frames of the values reported for this combo, given the sub-1% performance differences among all listed rivals.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination ranks 524th out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the top 14% of all configurations in the database. The ranking reflects the strong synergy between a high-end CPU and upper-midrange GPU, which together deliver playable performance across all tested resolutions except 4K Ultra.
Given that the CPU ranks in the 94th percentile and the GPU in the 83rd percentile among their respective categories, the combo’s overall position at 524 of 3723 is consistent with expectations. The ranking suggests that while this pairing is not the absolute fastest available, it outperforms the vast majority of tested systems. The 1080p Ultra average of 110.3 FPS and 1440p Ultra average of 73.2 FPS demonstrate that this combo excels in mainstream gaming scenarios, and the 4K High average of 60.7 FPS shows it can handle high-resolution gaming with appropriate settings.
The Verdict
The data indicates this PC can run Rust effectively at all three tested resolutions, provided the correct preset is selected. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 110.3 FPS, which is far above the 60 FPS playable threshold and offers the best visual quality available. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 73.2 FPS, maintaining smooth gameplay with high fidelity. At 3840x2160, the High preset averages 60.7 FPS, which clears the threshold by a narrow margin, while the Ultra preset at 45 FPS is not recommended for playable performance.
The verdict by resolution confirms that the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium at 4K, with High being the best choice. At 1440p and 1080p, all presets are playable, with Ultra providing the most demanding experience. The 60.7 FPS average at 4K High is the tightest margin in the dataset, so players with high-refresh-rate 4K displays may prefer the Medium preset at 65.4 FPS for added stability. Overall, the i7-14700K and RTX 4070 SUPER combo is a capable performer for Rust, excelling at 1080p and 1440p while remaining viable at 4K with adjusted settings.