Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 38 | 44 | 66 |
| 1440p QHD | 48 | 64 | 75 | 112 |
| 1080p Full HD | 70 | 92 | 110 | 163 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a playable Rust experience at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles at 4K. Benchmark data shows the combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p on Ultra settings (70 FPS average) and at 1440p on High settings (64 FPS average), while 4K is limited to Low settings (66 FPS average) to stay playable. The system ranks 2008th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the upper-middle tier of configurations.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on Ultra settings?
A: Only at 1920x1080 resolution. The measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 70, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average drops to 48 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Ultra it falls to 29 FPS.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?
A: High settings is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, with a measured average of 64 FPS. Medium settings also work at 75 FPS average, but High offers better visual quality while remaining above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 69355, sitting within 0.9% of its closest competitors. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F by 0.9%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX by 0.7%, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.2%, while leading the AMD EPYC 9115 by 0.1%.
Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks in the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666, a difference of -0.2%, meaning the RTX 4060 is essentially on par with that older card in synthetic benchmarks.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combination?
A: Only at Low settings, which produces a 66 FPS average. Medium settings at 4K drop to 44 FPS average, High to 38 FPS, and Ultra to 29 FPS. The verdict data confirms Low is the only playable preset at 3840x2160.
Q: Which component is more important for Rust at higher resolutions?
A: The data shows GPU scaling dominates as resolution increases. At 1080p, the spread between Low (163 FPS) and Ultra (70 FPS) is 93 FPS, while at 4K the same settings spread is only 37 FPS (66 FPS Low vs 29 FPS Ultra), indicating the GPU becomes the bottleneck sooner at higher resolutions.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i7-14700K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strength is evident: the system achieves 163 FPS on Low settings, suggesting the processor can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them at lower graphical loads. The i7-14700K's 20 cores and 28 threads, combined with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, provide substantial headroom for Rust's simulation and networking workloads. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile among all processors, with a cinebench r23 multi-core score of 33440.5 and a single-core score of 2160.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert more influence. The average FPS at Low settings drops from 163 at 1080p to 112, a 31% reduction, while the High preset falls from 92 to 64 FPS, a 30% drop. This scaling pattern indicates the RTX 4060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are becoming limiting factors as pixel count increases. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 236.2 GTexel/s texture rate handle the extra resolution load, but the margin between settings narrows compared to 1080p.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant constraint. The difference between Low (66 FPS) and Ultra (29 FPS) is 37 FPS, compared to a 93 FPS gap at 1080p. This compression suggests the RTX 4060's rendering pipeline saturates quickly at 4K, regardless of preset. The GPU's 48 ROPs and 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate struggle to fill 8.3 million pixels per frame, while the CPU's role diminishes because frame rates are low enough that processor overhead is rarely the bottleneck. The RTX 4060 ranks in the 61st GPU percentile, a modest position that aligns with its 4K limitations.
The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows a moderate GPU influence, but the jump to 4K reveals severe scaling penalties. Medium settings at 1080p yield 110 FPS, dropping to 75 at 1440p (-32%), then 44 at 4K (-41% from 1440p). This progressive degradation confirms that players targeting 4K need to rely on the CPU's strengths indirectly by lowering settings to Low, where the system still manages 66 FPS — the only playable 4K preset.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the only preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher is Low, with a measured average of 66 FPS. Medium drops to 44 FPS average, High to 38 FPS, and Ultra to 29 FPS. Players at 4K must accept Low settings to stay playable, though the 66 FPS average provides some margin above the threshold.
At 2560x1440, High settings is the most demanding playable option, achieving 64 FPS average. Medium runs at 75 FPS average, providing a safer buffer, while Low reaches 112 FPS. Ultra falls short at 48 FPS, so it is not recommended for smooth gameplay. The data shows High is the optimal balance, delivering 64 FPS while keeping visual quality elevated.
For 1920x1080, Ultra settings is playable at 70 FPS average, making it the best choice for maximum visual fidelity. High runs at 92 FPS, Medium at 110 FPS, and Low at 163 FPS. All presets exceed 60 FPS, so users can select based on their preference for visuals versus frame rate. Ultra at 70 FPS offers the best of both worlds, clearing the threshold with room to spare.
The Verdict
This PC can run Rust, but the experience varies sharply by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears 60 FPS on all four presets — Low (163 FPS), Medium (110 FPS), High (92 FPS), and Ultra (70 FPS) — making it fully capable at the most common gaming resolution. The verdict data confirms Ultra as the best setting with a 70 FPS average, so users can max out graphics without sacrificing playability.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on three of four presets: Low (112 FPS), Medium (75 FPS), and High (64 FPS). Ultra drops to 48 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold. High is the recommended setting, providing 64 FPS average. This resolution offers a solid experience, though users seeking higher frame rates should consider Medium for a 75 FPS average.
At 3840x2160, only Low settings achieves playable performance at 66 FPS average. Medium (44 FPS), High (38 FPS), and Ultra (29 FPS) all fall short. The system can technically run Rust at 4K, but only with drastically reduced graphical quality. Players prioritizing 4K should expect a compromised visual experience, as even Medium settings fail to reach 60 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
3840x2160:
- Low: 66 FPS average
- Medium: 44 FPS average, 38 FPS minimum, 51 FPS maximum
- High: 38 FPS average
- Ultra: 29 FPS average
The 4K data shows a steep drop from Low to Medium, a 22 FPS decline, followed by smaller gaps to High (6 FPS) and Ultra (9 FPS). The minimum FPS of 38 at Medium indicates occasional stutter, reinforcing that Low is the only stable option.
2560x1440:
- Low: 112 FPS average
- Medium: 75 FPS average, 64 FPS minimum, 87 FPS maximum
- High: 64 FPS average
- Ultra: 48 FPS average
At 1440p, Medium provides a 75 FPS average with a 64 FPS minimum, staying above the threshold even in dips. High matches the minimum at 64 FPS, leaving less headroom. Ultra falls 12 FPS short of the 60 FPS target.
1920x1080:
- Low: 163 FPS average
- Medium: 110 FPS average, 93 FPS minimum, 126 FPS maximum
- High: 92 FPS average
- Ultra: 70 FPS average
1080p performance is strong across the board. Even Ultra maintains a 70 FPS average, and Medium's 93 FPS minimum ensures smooth gameplay. Low reaches 163 FPS, ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 2008th out of 3723 tested configurations for Rust, placing it in the 54th percentile of all combos. This mid-pack ranking reflects a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU relative to their respective fields. The i7-14700K sits in the 94th CPU percentile, while the RTX 4060 only reaches the 61st GPU percentile, creating an imbalance that shows up at higher resolutions.
The CPU's nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (-0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (-0.7%), and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (-0.9%) — all score within 1% of the i7-14700K, indicating the processor is competitive with top-tier alternatives. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (-0.2%) and AMD Radeon 780M (+0.3%), are far less modern, highlighting the RTX 4060's modest standing. This combination's rank suggests it is a balanced 1080p performer that loses ground at 4K due to the GPU's limitations. Players seeking higher resolutions would benefit from a stronger GPU, as the CPU clearly has headroom to support more demanding graphics hardware.