Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 39 | 47 | 68 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 67 | 80 | 120 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 97 | 117 | 173 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a broadly capable Rust experience, but the data shows a clear divide between 1080p/1440p playability and 4K limitations. Measured results indicate that this combination handles the survival title with ease at lower resolutions, yet demands careful settings management at 3840x2160 to maintain a playable frame rate. Benchmark data places this combo at rank 1785 out of 3723 tested configurations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems for this game.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination proves highly capable across all presets. The Low preset delivers an average of 172.6 FPS, making it more than sufficient for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings produce 116.6 FPS, while High settings yield 96.5 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains a solid 73.2 FPS average, comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The scaling between presets is consistent, with each step down in quality providing roughly a 20-25 FPS improvement.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows expected degradation. Low settings produce exactly 120 FPS, a significant drop from the 172.6 FPS at 1080p but still excellent for competitive play. Medium settings average 80 FPS, while High settings achieve 67.1 FPS — just above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings fall below playability at 54.2 FPS, indicating that this preset is not viable at this resolution for a consistently smooth experience.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Low settings manage 67.8 FPS, clearing the playability bar but leaving little headroom. Medium settings drop to 47.2 FPS, High settings fall to 38.5 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 32.2 FPS. The data reveals a steep performance cliff between Low and Medium at 4K, suggesting the 12 GB frame buffer and memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s are strained by higher-quality textures and effects at this resolution.
Across all resolutions, the frame pacing appears consistent based on the available average FPS data, though min and max values are not provided in the measured results. The pattern shows that the i7-14700K's single-thread performance, reflected in its Geekbench single-core score of 2569 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2160, is sufficient to keep the RX 6750 XT well-fed at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU's raw throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 limits 4K performance.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the AMD EPYC 9115 with an average score of 69288 (just 0.1% behind the i7-14700K), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69515 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69875 (0.7% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F at 69996 (0.9% ahead). These processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust, as the game's performance is largely dictated by single-core strength and the GPU at lower resolutions. Any of these CPUs paired with an RX 6750 XT would yield results within 1% of the measured figures.
On the GPU side, the Radeon RX 6750 XT's nearest rivals are somewhat unexpected. The AMD Radeon R9 M395X scores 25891 (0.5% higher), the AMD FirePro W7100 scores 25856 (0.6% higher), the AMD FirePro D700 scores 25842 (0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 25740 (1.1% lower). These deltas are minimal, meaning a system with any of these GPUs paired with a comparable modern CPU would produce nearly indistinguishable Rust performance. The RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, despite being a laptop part, benchmarks within 1.1% of the RX 6750 XT and would offer similar frame rates in this title.
For a system builder, choosing any of the rival CPUs would not meaningfully change Rust performance. The i7-14700K's 20 cores and 28 threads are far more than Rust requires, so the bottleneck at 4K is purely the GPU. Similarly, the GPU rivals listed would all deliver within a single percentage point of the RX 6750 XT's measured FPS, making them equivalent choices for this specific game.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: Only with Low settings. The measured average at 3840x2160 with Low preset is 67.8 FPS, while Medium drops to 47.2 FPS. Any higher preset falls well below the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: High settings achieve 67.1 FPS average at 2560x1440. Ultra settings drop to 54.2 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does this combo perform at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 produces an average of 73.2 FPS, comfortably clearing the 60 FPS threshold. High settings yield 96.5 FPS, Medium 116.6 FPS, and Low 172.6 FPS.
Q: What is the ranking of this CPU+GPU combo among all tested systems for Rust?
A: The combination ranks 1785 out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the 48th percentile of all configurations tested for this game.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?
A: At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as frame rates drop sharply with higher settings. The i7-14700K's strong single-core performance (2160 in Cinebench R23) ensures the CPU is not limiting at any resolution tested, given the 125W TDP and boost clock of 5.60 GHz.
Q: Are there any settings where this system exceeds 100 FPS?
A: Yes, at 1920x1080 with Low settings (172.6 FPS) and Medium settings (116.6 FPS). At 2560x1440, Low settings hit exactly 120 FPS.
The Verdict
The data clearly indicates that this PC can run Rust, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS threshold, with even the most demanding settings producing 73.2 FPS. This makes 1080p gaming fully viable with maximum visual quality.
At 2560x1440, the system remains capable but requires some compromise. High settings achieve 67.1 FPS, which is playable, but Ultra settings fall to 54.2 FPS. Gamers wanting Ultra quality at this resolution would need to accept frame rates below 60 FPS, though the 54.2 FPS average may still be tolerable for many players.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more restrictive. Only Low settings clear the 60 FPS bar, delivering 67.8 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra presets produce 47.2, 38.5, and 32.2 FPS respectively, which are not playable by the 60 FPS standard. The system can technically run Rust at 4K, but only with significantly reduced visual fidelity.
The overall verdict: this system is a solid 1080p and 1440p performer for Rust, with 4K limited to Low settings. Players prioritizing high refresh rates will find excellent results at 1080p, while those with 1440p monitors can enjoy High settings at a playable frame rate.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 67.8 FPS. This is the only playable option at this resolution, providing a comfortable margin above the threshold but requiring significant visual compromises.
At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, delivering 67.1 FPS. This offers a good balance of visual quality and performance, with enough headroom that occasional dips are unlikely to fall below 60 FPS. Medium settings provide 80 FPS for those wanting more margin, while Ultra at 54.2 FPS is not recommended.
At 1920x1080, the most demanding playable preset is Ultra, achieving 73.2 FPS. This allows players to enable maximum settings and still maintain a smooth experience. For those with 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, dropping to High (96.5 FPS), Medium (116.6 FPS), or Low (172.6 FPS) provides progressively higher frame rates.
How This Combo Ranks
Among the 3723 tested system configurations for Rust, this Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination ranks 1785th. This places it almost exactly in the middle of the field, at approximately the 48th percentile of all tested combos. The ranking reflects the fact that while the CPU is a high-end part (94th percentile among all CPUs), the GPU sits at the 71st percentile among all GPUs, pulling the overall combo down.
The i7-14700K's benchmark scores are strong — its average benchmark score of 69355 puts it within 1% of top-tier rivals like the Ryzen 9 7950X. However, the RX 6750 XT's average score of 26011 and 71st percentile ranking means this combo is outclassed by systems pairing the same CPU with higher-end GPUs. For Rust specifically, the game's moderate graphics demands mean the combo still performs well at mainstream resolutions, but the mid-pack ranking indicates that many other configurations deliver higher frame rates, particularly at 4K where the GPU becomes the limiting factor.