Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
250 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
150 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
220 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
103 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
5.1ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 53,620
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 77,712

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 80 95 141
1440p QHD 103 136 161 220
1080p Full HD 150 197 215 250

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 197
1920x1080 Low 250
1920x1080 Medium 215
1920x1080 Ultra 150
2560x1440 High 136
2560x1440 Low 220
2560x1440 Medium 161
2560x1440 Ultra 103
3840x2160 High 80
3840x2160 Low 141
3840x2160 Medium 95
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D delivers a decisive performance tier for Rust, with every tested preset at every resolution clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data shows a combo that is not merely playable but overwhelmingly capable, ranking in the top fraction of all tested configurations for this title. Benchmark results indicate that users can prioritize visual fidelity without compromise, as the most demanding setting remains comfortably above the playability baseline across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset holds an average of 61 FPS, which is the highest quality setting that maintains at least 60 FPS. This makes Ultra the definitive choice for 4K gameplay, as the data confirms it is both playable and the most visually demanding option available. The High preset runs at 80 FPS, Medium at 95 FPS, and Low at 141 FPS, but none of these offer the visual ceiling of Ultra while still meeting the 60 FPS floor.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 103 FPS on average, providing a substantial performance buffer over the 60 FPS threshold. This resolution offers the best balance for high-refresh-rate displays, as even the most demanding settings deliver frame rates well beyond standard playability. The scaling from 4K to 1440p shows a 68.9% improvement in Ultra preset performance, indicating that the GPU is the primary driver at higher resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset reaches 150 FPS on average, which is more than double the playability threshold. The data shows that even at 1080p, where CPU load typically increases relative to GPU load, this combo sustains exceptionally high frame rates. The Low preset hits 250 FPS, Medium 215 FPS, and High 197 FPS, but Ultra remains the recommended setting due to its combination of visual quality and performance headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 25th out of 3,723 tested combinations in Rust, placing it in the 99th percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects the exceptional synergy between the 20-core Intel processor and the 32 GB GDDR7 graphics card, which together produce frame rates that only a small fraction of systems can match. The rank is particularly notable given the breadth of the tested field, which includes a wide range of CPU and GPU pairings.

The percentileVsAllCpus score of 91 for the i7-14700F and the percentileVsAllGpus score of 92 for the RTX 5090 D indicate that both components are individually high-performing, but their combined rank of 25 suggests they work together more effectively than their separate percentiles would imply. This is likely due to the CPU's strong single-threaded performance, which is critical for Rust's simulation-heavy gameplay, paired with the GPU's massive memory bandwidth and compute resources.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured frame rates show a clear progression from Low to Ultra. The Low preset averages 250 FPS, which is the highest recorded average in the entire dataset. Medium averages 215 FPS with a minimum of 182 FPS and a maximum of 247 FPS, providing a tight frame-time distribution. High averages 197 FPS, while Ultra averages 150 FPS. The minimum frame rate for Ultra is not recorded, but the average remains well above any stutter threshold.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low averages 220 FPS, Medium averages 161 FPS with a minimum of 136 FPS and a maximum of 185 FPS, High averages 136 FPS, and Ultra averages 103 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 136 FPS shows that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate never approaches the 60 FPS playability threshold, leaving substantial headroom for competitive play.

At 3840x2160, the results remain strong but show the expected impact of increased resolution. Low averages 141 FPS, Medium averages 95 FPS with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 109 FPS, High averages 80 FPS, and Ultra averages 61 FPS. The Ultra preset's 61 FPS average is just above the 60 FPS threshold, but the data does not include a minimum frame rate for this setting, so the variance is unknown. Medium's 81 FPS minimum provides a safer alternative for 4K gameplay if frame-time consistency is a priority.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700F, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon 6505P with a score of 53,701, which is 0.2% higher than the i7's 53,620 average. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288, which is 0.6% lower, while the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53,206, 0.8% lower. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53,469, 0.3% higher. These CPUs would likely deliver very similar frame rates in Rust, as their benchmark scores are within a fraction of a percent of the i7-14700F.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT with an average score of 76,904, which is 1.1% higher than the RTX 5090 D's 77,712 average. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940, 1.6% lower, while the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79,396, 2.1% lower, and the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79,605, 2.4% lower. These GPUs would produce nearly identical performance in Rust, with the RX 6650M XT being the closest match despite being a mobile-focused part.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU at different resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more significant role, as the frame rates are highest and the GPU has less work per pixel. The jump from Ultra at 150 FPS to Low at 250 FPS represents a 66.7% increase, indicating that the CPU can push the GPU to its limits at lower resolutions. This is consistent with Rust's known CPU sensitivity, particularly in scenes with many entities and player structures.

At 2560x1440, the scaling between presets shows a more balanced distribution. Low averages 220 FPS, Medium 161 FPS, High 136 FPS, and Ultra 103 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 53.4%, which is smaller than at 1080p, suggesting the GPU begins to assert more influence as resolution increases. The Medium preset's minimum of 136 FPS shows that the GPU can maintain high frame rates even in complex scenes.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The Ultra preset's 61 FPS average is only 56.7% of the Low preset's 141 FPS, showing that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors at 4K. The CPU's role diminishes, as evidenced by the smaller performance gaps between presets. The RTX 5090 D's 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth and 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are critical at this resolution, while the i7-14700F's 33 MB L3 cache and high boost clock of 5.40 GHz still provide enough single-threaded performance to avoid bottlenecking.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for 4K gaming in Rust?

A: The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 61 FPS, which is the most demanding setting that remains at or above the 60 FPS playability threshold. High, Medium, and Low are also playable, but Ultra offers the highest visual quality.

Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 25th out of 3,723 tested combinations in Rust, placing it in the top 1% of all systems. This rank is driven by the CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 92nd percentile scores, which combine to deliver exceptional frame rates.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 D or the i7-14700F more important for Rust performance?

A: The GPU becomes more important at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's single-threaded performance is critical, but at 4K, the GPU's 32 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are the primary factors. The data shows a 56.7% drop from Low to Ultra at 4K, versus a 66.7% drop at 1080p.

Q: What are the frame rates at 1440p Ultra settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 103 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: Are there any settings where the frame rate drops below 60 FPS?

A: No. Every tested preset at every resolution maintains an average frame rate above 60 FPS. The lowest recorded average is 61 FPS at 4K Ultra, and the lowest minimum frame rate is 81 FPS at 4K Medium.

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53,620, which is within 0.8% of its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 0.6% lower, the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 0.8% lower, and the Intel Xeon 6505P scores 0.2% higher, indicating near-identical CPU performance for Rust.