Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 27 | 32 | 48 |
| 1440p QHD | 35 | 46 | 54 | 81 |
| 1080p Full HD | 51 | 67 | 79 | 118 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the Intel Arc B570 is a combination that ranks 2996th out of 3723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the lower portion of the database. While the CPU is a high-end part with an average benchmark score that beats 91% of all tested CPUs, the GPU sits at the 65th percentile among all tested GPUs. This pairing shows a significant bottleneck on the graphics side, particularly at higher resolutions, where the Arc B570's performance ceiling becomes the limiting factor for playability.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 2996 out of 3723 tested configurations puts this system in the bottom 20% of all tested pairings for Rust. This is a surprisingly low position given the components' individual specifications, but it reflects the demanding nature of Rust and the specific performance characteristics of the Intel Arc B570 at higher graphical presets.
The ranking indicates that while the CPU is capable of feeding frames efficiently, the GPU cannot keep pace with the most demanding settings. At 1080p, the combo manages playable frame rates across three of the four tested presets, but at 1440p, only the Low preset remains viable. At 4K, no settings achieve the 60 FPS playability threshold, which severely limits the practical use case for this combination at high resolutions.
This rank suggests that the combo is better suited for 1080p gaming in Rust, where it can deliver smooth performance at High settings. The gap between the CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the GPU's 65th percentile ranking underscores an imbalance: the i7-14700F has substantial headroom, but the Arc B570 becomes the constraining factor as resolution and graphical demands increase.
CPU and GPU Roles
Benchmark results indicate a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 118 FPS on average, which is the highest score recorded across all tested configurations. This suggests that at lower resolutions and lighter presets, the CPU is capable of driving high frame rates, and the GPU is not yet the limiting factor.
At 2560x1440, the average frame rates drop to 81 FPS at Low settings, a 31% decrease from the 1080p Low result. This scaling indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on a more significant role, as the resolution increase places additional strain on the rendering pipeline. The CPU's contribution remains important, but the frame rate decline is more pronounced than what would be expected from CPU-bound performance alone.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The average frame rate at Low settings is 48 FPS, which is 59% lower than the 1080p Low result of 118 FPS. This steep drop-off at 4K, even with Low settings, confirms that the Arc B570's memory bandwidth and compute resources are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at this resolution. The CPU's role diminishes significantly at 4K, as the GPU is saturated and cannot render frames fast enough to utilize the i7-14700F's processing power.
Across presets at each resolution, the pattern repeats: moving from Low to Ultra at 1080p drops the average from 118 FPS to 51 FPS, a 57% reduction. At 1440p, the same preset change reduces performance from 81 FPS to 35 FPS, a 57% decline. At 4K, the drop is from 48 FPS to 21 FPS, a 56% reduction. This consistent scaling indicates that the GPU's performance scales predictably with preset changes, and the CPU is not introducing additional variability.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average frame rate of 67 FPS. This is the highest playable setting for this resolution, and it provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset also remains playable at 79 FPS, but High offers better visual quality while maintaining playability.
At 2560x1440, only the Low preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold, with an average frame rate of 81 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 54 FPS, and High drops to 46 FPS. This means that users at 1440p must accept significant graphical compromises to maintain smooth performance.
At 3840x2160, no settings achieve the 60 FPS playability threshold. The highest average frame rate is 48 FPS at Low settings, which falls below the playable threshold. The Ultra preset averages only 21 FPS, making 4K gaming effectively unplayable with this combination in Rust.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700F, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon 6505P with a delta of -0.2%, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 with a delta of 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with a delta of 0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7313P with a delta of 0.8%. These processors have average scores within 1% of the i7-14700F's 53620 average, meaning they would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust.
For the Intel Arc B570, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Arc A750 with a delta of -0.1%, the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M with a delta of 0.4%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X with a delta of -0.5%. These GPUs have average scores within 1% of the Arc B570's 20556 average, so users could expect similar frame rates in Rust when paired with the same CPU.
It is importantly the Arc A750 is a desktop GPU from the same manufacturer with a nearly identical average score, making it a direct alternative. The RTX 3070 Mobile is a laptop part, which may have different thermal and power characteristics, but its benchmark score suggests comparable raw performance. The Quadro M4000M and R9 M390X are older professional and mobile parts respectively, but their scores indicate they would perform similarly in this game.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the measured frame rates are consistently below playable levels. The Low preset averages 48 FPS, Medium averages 32 FPS with a minimum of 27 and a maximum of 37, High averages 27 FPS, and Ultra averages 21 FPS. The Medium preset shows the only recorded minimum and maximum values at this resolution, indicating a relatively narrow frame time distribution.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 81 FPS, making it the only playable option. Medium averages 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 and a maximum of 62, High averages 46 FPS, and Ultra averages 35 FPS. The Medium preset's maximum of 62 FPS briefly crosses the playable threshold, but the average remains below it.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are more varied. Low averages 118 FPS, Medium averages 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91, High averages 67 FPS, and Ultra averages 51 FPS. The High preset's 67 FPS average is the best playable option, with the Medium preset offering higher average performance at 79 FPS but with lower visual quality.
FAQ
Q: Can this combination run Rust at 1080p with High settings?
A: Yes, the measured average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings is 67 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, only the Low preset achieves playable performance, with an average frame rate of 81 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 54 FPS, and higher presets are not viable.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this combination in Rust?
A: No, the verdict data shows that no settings at 3840x2160 reach the 60 FPS playability threshold. The highest average frame rate is 48 FPS at Low settings, which is below the playable threshold.
Q: How does the CPU compare to the GPU in terms of benchmark percentiles?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700F ranks in the 91st percentile among all tested CPUs, while the Intel Arc B570 ranks in the 65th percentile among all tested GPUs. This indicates the CPU has significantly more relative performance headroom than the GPU.
Q: What GPU alternatives perform similarly to the Arc B570?
A: The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile with a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Arc A750 with a delta of -0.1%, the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M with a delta of 0.4%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X with a delta of -0.5%. All have average benchmark scores within 1% of the Arc B570.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 118 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 51 FPS. This represents a 57% reduction in average frame rate when moving from Low to Ultra settings.