Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
254 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
114 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
184 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
79 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
105 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
48 FPS
6.6ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 46,881
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 44,795

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 61 70 105
1440p QHD 79 105 122 184
1080p Full HD 114 152 177 254

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 152
1920x1080 Low 254
1920x1080 Medium 177
1920x1080 Ultra 114
2560x1440 High 105
2560x1440 Low 184
2560x1440 Medium 122
2560x1440 Ultra 79
3840x2160 High 61
3840x2160 Low 105
3840x2160 Medium 70
3840x2160 Ultra 48

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti delivers a robust Rust experience, with the data showing that 1080p and 1440p gaming are entirely comfortable at maximum settings, while 4K requires a slight compromise. This combination ranks in the 378th position out of 3723 tested hardware combos for Rust, placing it in the top tier of systems for this title. The measured frame rates indicate that the system is capable of high-refresh-rate play at standard resolutions, but the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making High settings the optimal choice for 3840x2160 displays.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates exceptional headroom across all presets. The Low preset produces an average of 253.5 FPS, which is more than four times the playable threshold. Moving to Medium, the frame rate drops to 177.4 FPS, still offering a substantial margin for high-refresh-rate monitors. The High preset delivers 151.9 FPS, showing that even with increased visual fidelity, the hardware remains well ahead of the 60 FPS target. The most demanding Ultra preset at 1080p still achieves 114.4 FPS, which is nearly double the playable threshold and indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti is not the limiting factor at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the performance scaling remains strong. The Low preset reaches 184 FPS, while Medium produces 121.9 FPS. High settings yield 105.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 78.6 FPS. All four presets at 1440p clear the 60 FPS line with room to spare, and the Ultra setting maintains a comfortable margin for smooth gameplay. The difference between 1080p and 1440p is notable but not drastic, with Ultra falling from 114.4 FPS to 78.6 FPS, a reduction that keeps the experience fluid.

At 3840x2160, the system's limits become visible. The Low preset generates 104.6 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium settings produce 70.1 FPS, and High comes in at 60.9 FPS, just above the playable threshold. However, the Ultra preset drops to 47.5 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS target. This data shows a clear pattern: 4K Ultra is not viable, but dropping to High settings provides a stable frame rate that meets the minimum playability standard.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a shift in workload balance between the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with the Low preset hitting 253.5 FPS. These numbers suggest that the i7-13700K's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and PassMark single-thread score of 4333, is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently at lower resolutions. The gap between 1080p Low and 1440p Low is substantial, dropping from 253.5 FPS to 184 FPS, which indicates that the GPU begins to take on more responsibility as pixel count increases.

At 2560x1440, the scaling from Low to Ultra shows a consistent decrease, with Ultra at 78.6 FPS representing a 57% reduction from Low's 184 FPS. This pattern points to the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck at this resolution. The RTX 4070 Ti's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are likely being utilized more fully, while the CPU still has headroom to spare.

The 3840x2160 results further confirm the GPU-bound nature of the system at higher resolutions. The jump from 1080p Ultra at 114.4 FPS to 4K Ultra at 47.5 FPS is a 58% decrease, while the corresponding drop for Low settings is from 253.5 FPS to 104.6 FPS, a 59% reduction. This consistent scaling across all presets indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti is the limiting factor at 4K, while the i7-13700K's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample processing power to avoid becoming a constraint.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: Yes, but only up to High settings. The measured data shows High at 3840x2160 produces an average of 60.9 FPS, just above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings achieve 70.1 FPS, and Low reaches 104.6 FPS, but Ultra drops to 47.5 FPS, which is not playable.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this hardware?

A: The Ultra preset is fully playable at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 78.6 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that stays above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44795. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152, which is 0.8% higher, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384, 1.3% higher. The RTX A6000 scores 44075, 1.6% lower, and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45592, 1.7% higher.

Q: Is the i7-13700K a strong match for the RTX 4070 Ti in Rust?

A: The data indicates a balanced pairing. The CPU's percentile rank of 89 among all CPUs and the GPU's percentile rank of 84 among all GPUs suggest both components are high performers. The i7-13700K's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, has a nearly identical average score of 46971, just 0.2% lower.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with the High preset?

A: The High preset at 1920x1080 produces an average of 151.9 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and provides a smooth experience for high-refresh-rate displays.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with Medium settings?

A: Yes, the Medium preset at 3840x2160 achieves an average of 70.1 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS target. This makes Medium a viable option for 4K users who cannot reach the recommended High preset.

The Verdict

This PC configuration is fully capable of running Rust at 60 FPS across the vast majority of settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest being Ultra at 114.4 FPS. The 2560x1440 resolution is equally impressive, with every preset including Ultra at 78.6 FPS remaining playable. For 4K gaming, the system delivers playable frame rates on Low, Medium, and High settings, but the Ultra preset falls short at 47.5 FPS.

The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, which produces 60.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra is the best setting, achieving 78.6 FPS. At 1920x1080, Ultra is also the best setting, delivering 114.4 FPS. For users prioritizing visual fidelity, 1440p Ultra offers the sweet spot of high quality and fluid performance. For 4K displays, High settings provide a just-above-threshold experience, while Medium offers a more comfortable margin at 70.1 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores 46971, a difference of -0.2%, meaning the i7-13700K is essentially matched in performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, 0.3% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654, 0.5% lower. The Intel Xeon w3-2535 also scores 46653, 0.5% lower. Any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Rust, with the differences being negligible in real-world gameplay.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44795, ranking at the 84th percentile. The closest competitors are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile at 45152, which is 0.8% faster, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45384, which is 1.3% faster. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075, 1.6% slower, and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45592, 1.7% faster. These alternatives would yield very similar FPS numbers in Rust, with the RTX 5090 Mobile and Arc A730M offering a marginal performance edge and the RTX A6000 trailing slightly.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at or above 60 FPS is High, which achieves an average of 60.9 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 4K displays, as it provides the best visual quality without dipping below the playable threshold. Medium is also viable at 70.1 FPS and offers a more substantial safety margin.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 78.6 FPS. This setting provides maximum visual quality while still maintaining a comfortable buffer above 60 FPS, making it the optimal balance of fidelity and performance for 1440p monitors.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the top recommendation, with an average of 114.4 FPS. This setting offers the highest visual quality while keeping the frame rate far above the playable threshold, allowing for smooth gameplay on even high-refresh-rate displays. Users with 240Hz monitors could also consider the High preset at 151.9 FPS or Medium at 177.4 FPS for even higher frame rates, but Ultra remains the best visual choice.