Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
163 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
70 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
112 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
48 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
66 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
10.9ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 46,881
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 38 44 66
1440p QHD 48 64 75 112
1080p Full HD 70 92 110 163

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 92
1920x1080 Low 163
1920x1080 Medium 110
1920x1080 Ultra 70
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Low 112
2560x1440 Medium 75
2560x1440 Ultra 48
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 66
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a mid-range-to-high-end combination that delivers a distinct performance profile in Rust, a Survival title. The data indicates that this system is capable of running the game smoothly at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires significant settings compromises. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 89th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU is more mainstream, ranking in the 61st percentile against all GPUs. This pairing creates a system where the processor has substantial headroom, and the graphics card is the primary limiter at higher resolutions and presets.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-13700K provide a clear picture of its computational standing. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 has an average score of 46971, which is a negligible 0.2% lower than the i7-13700K's score of 46881. This places them in the same performance tier for multi-threaded workloads. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, a 0.3% difference, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654, a 0.5% difference. The Intel Xeon w3-2535 also falls within this tight cluster with a score of 46653, a 0.5% difference. Benchmark results indicate that any of these processors would offer near-identical in-game performance for CPU-bound scenarios, making them direct alternatives if the specific platform or price point of the i7-13700K is not a priority.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060's nearest rivals are more unexpected. The AMD Radeon HD 7790, a much older card, scores 17666, only 0.2% higher than the RTX 4060's 17639. The data shows that the AMD Radeon 780M integrated graphics, with a score of 17588, is also a close match, trailing by just 0.3%. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460, with scores of 17551 and 17509, are 0.5% and 0.7% lower, respectively. In practice, these rivals would produce very similar frame rates in Rust, though the modern feature set and driver support of the RTX 4060 would not be reflected in these raw scores. For a gamer, the closest performance alternative would be a system with an RTX 4060-class GPU, which the data suggests could include some surprisingly old discrete cards or high-end integrated graphics.

How This Combo Ranks

In the specific context of Rust, this combination of CPU and GPU holds a rank of 2008 out of 3723 tested combinations. This puts it in the middle-to-upper portion of the overall performance distribution, though it is not near the top. The rank reflects the balance of the components and the game's demands. Given that the CPU is in the 89th percentile and the GPU is in the 61st percentile, the overall rank of 2008 is heavily influenced by the GPU's more moderate standing. The data suggests that while this system is far from the bottom, there are many combinations that will produce higher frame rates, likely those with more powerful graphics cards. This rank is a useful data point for understanding that the system is competent but not elite for Rust.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming?

A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is playable, with an average of 70 FPS. The data confirms this is the most demanding preset that still clears the 60 FPS threshold, making it the best choice for maximum visual quality at this resolution.

Q: Can this system handle Rust at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the system can play the game, but only on the Low preset, which yields an average of 66 FPS. Higher presets like Medium and High drop to 44 FPS and 38 FPS respectively, which are below the playable threshold.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1440p?

A: The performance difference is substantial. At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves an average of 112 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 48 FPS. This represents a significant margin of 64 FPS between the two extremes.

Q: Does the 4K Medium preset maintain a consistent frame rate?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 44, with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 51 FPS. This indicates a relatively stable performance window, but one that is below the 60 FPS target.

Q: Is the i7-13700K or the RTX 4060 the limiting factor at 1080p Ultra?

A: Based on the data, the RTX 4060 is the primary constraint. The CPU's high percentile rank suggests it has ample headroom, while the GPU's more moderate rank and the significant frame rate drop at higher presets point to it being the bottleneck when pushing visual fidelity.

Q: What is the highest playable preset at 1440p?

A: The High preset is the most demanding playable option at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 64 FPS. While the Medium and Low presets are also playable, High offers the best visual quality that still maintains frame rates above the 60 FPS threshold.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Rust, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. The verdict by resolution is clear. At 1920x1080, all four tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with average frame rates of 163, 110, 92, and 70 FPS, respectively. This makes 1080p the optimal resolution for this combination, allowing for maximum settings. At 2560x1440, the system can still deliver a smooth experience, but the Ultra preset falls to 48 FPS, which is unplayable. The best playable preset here is High, at 64 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system is severely limited, with only the Low preset achieving a playable average of 66 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 44 FPS, and High and Ultra are at 38 and 29 FPS, respectively. The data indicates that for a consistent 60+ FPS experience, users should stick to 1080p or 1440p with adjusted settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU. At 1080p, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The frame rate drops dramatically as settings increase, from 163 FPS on Low to 70 FPS on Ultra. This is a 93 FPS difference, highlighting the GPU's workload. The CPU, which ranks in the 89th percentile, is unlikely to be the limiting factor at this resolution. Moving to 1440p, the trend continues, with the Ultra preset dropping to 48 FPS. The GPU is still the primary constraint, as the higher resolution increases the pixel count and shader work. At 4K, the GPU's limitations become even more pronounced. The Low preset yields 66 FPS, but Medium drops to 44 FPS, and High to 38 FPS. The data suggests that the CPU's performance is sufficient at all resolutions, and the RTX 4060's 8 GB of memory and 128-bit bus are the primary factors preventing higher settings at 4K. In summary, the CPU provides a stable foundation, but the GPU dictates the playable settings at each resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data provides clear guidance on the best settings for each resolution to maintain a playable frame rate above 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 70 FPS. This is the optimal choice for visual fidelity. At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, with an average of 64 FPS. While the Medium preset is also playable, High offers superior visual quality for a modest performance cost. At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, which delivers an average of 66 FPS. This is the only option that clears the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended setting for 4K gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across all tested configurations. For 1920x1080, the Low preset leads with an average of 163 FPS. The Medium preset averages 110 FPS, with a minimum of 93 FPS and a maximum of 126 FPS. The High preset averages 92 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 70 FPS, which is the lowest playable result at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves an average of 112 FPS. The Medium preset averages 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 87 FPS. The High preset averages 64 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 48 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only playable option, with an average of 66 FPS. The Medium preset averages 44 FPS, with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 51 FPS. The High preset averages 38 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 29 FPS. This breakdown shows a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution and settings increase, with the most significant drops occurring at 4K.