Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 38 | 46 | 70 |
| 1440p QHD | 49 | 68 | 78 | 116 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 97 | 115 | 168 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti delivers a solid, though not flawless, Rust experience. Benchmark data indicates that this combination is capable of exceeding the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p and 1440p, but only at 4K with reduced settings. The system's ranking at 1832 out of 3723 tested combos places it in the upper half of performance, showing a balanced partnership where the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU's Ampere architecture handle Rust's demanding survival sandbox effectively. The data clearly shows that resolution scaling and preset selection are critical, as the frame rate nearly doubles when moving from 4K Ultra to 1080p Low.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Low settings is 70.1 FPS. High, Medium, and Ultra presets all fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold, with averages of 37.8, 45.9, and 32.5 FPS, respectively.
Q: What is the best preset for 2560x1440 gaming?
A: High settings provide the best visual quality while maintaining playability, achieving an average of 67.7 FPS. While Low and Medium are also playable (115.5 and 77.6 FPS), High offers the highest fidelity that stays above the 60 FPS mark.
Q: Does the RTX 3060 Ti bottleneck the Core i7-13700K in Rust?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions and presets, but the CPU provides ample headroom. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 167.6 FPS, indicating strong CPU performance. The frame rate scales down consistently as resolution and settings increase, which is typical of GPU-bound scenarios.
Q: How does this combo compare to other tested systems?
A: This combination ranks 1832 out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the 49th percentile of all systems tested. This indicates it performs better than roughly half of the configurations tested, with the CPU ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs and the GPU in the 59th percentile of all GPUs.
Q: Is the system capable of reaching 144 FPS in Rust?
A: Only at 1920x1080 with Low settings, where it achieves 167.6 FPS. At 1440p Low, it hits 115.5 FPS, and at 1080p Medium it reaches 114.8 FPS. None of the Ultra or High settings at 1440p or 4K reach 144 FPS.
Q: What is the most demanding setting that stays above 60 FPS at 1080p?
A: Ultra settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 75.6 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution. High (97.4 FPS), Medium (114.8 FPS), and Low (167.6 FPS) all exceed 60 FPS as well.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior depending on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces 167.6 FPS, which is the highest number recorded across all tests. This high frame rate at a CPU-friendly resolution indicates that the Intel Core i7-13700K, with its 16 cores and 24 threads, is not the limiting factor in this configuration. The CPU's benchmark scores reinforce this, as it scores 30745 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 12412 in 3DMark max threads, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs.
As resolution increases, the GPU's role becomes more prominent. Moving from 1080p Low to 4K Low, the average frame rate drops from 167.6 FPS to 70.1 FPS, a 58% reduction. This scaling pattern is consistent with GPU-bound rendering, where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are taxed more heavily at higher pixel counts. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs supports the notion that it is the weaker link in this pairing, though it remains capable of handling Rust at most settings.
The interaction between resolution and preset quality further illustrates this dynamic. At 1080p, the frame rate drops from 167.6 FPS at Low to 75.6 FPS at Ultra, a 55% reduction, showing that graphical settings also heavily impact GPU load. At 4K, the drop is even more severe, from 70.1 FPS at Low to 32.5 FPS at Ultra, a 54% reduction from an already lower baseline. This suggests that at 4K, the RTX 3060 Ti lacks the raw throughput to maintain high frame rates at demanding presets, making the CPU's performance largely irrelevant at that resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160 (4K), the system shows significant performance variation across presets. Low settings deliver an average of 70.1 FPS, which is the only playable configuration at this resolution. Medium settings drop to 45.9 FPS, High settings produce 37.8 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 32.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 37.6 FPS, demonstrating that preset selection has a drastic impact on 4K performance.
At 2560x1440 (1440p), the frame rates improve substantially. Low settings hit 115.5 FPS, Medium settings reach 77.6 FPS, and High settings achieve 67.7 FPS, all of which clear the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings, however, drop to 48.6 FPS, which is below the playable mark. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 66.9 FPS, indicating that while the GPU can handle lower presets easily, it struggles with the highest quality settings.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system performs strongly across all presets. Low settings produce an excellent 167.6 FPS, Medium settings reach 114.8 FPS, High settings achieve 97.4 FPS, and even Ultra settings maintain a comfortable 75.6 FPS. This is the only resolution where every preset is playable, with the difference between Low and Ultra being 92.0 FPS. The data shows that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combination, offering smooth gameplay even at maximum quality.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific configuration ranks 1832 out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the 49.2nd percentile of all systems evaluated. This position indicates that while it is not a top-tier performer, it sits comfortably above the median, outperforming more than half of the tested combinations. The CPU is a standout component, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, which is significantly higher than the GPU's 59th percentile ranking.
The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores 46971 with a -0.2% delta, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 at 47022 with a -0.3% delta. The Intel Core i7-13700K's average benchmark score of 46881 is nearly identical to these competitors, showing that it is comparable to high-end desktop and mobile processors. On the GPU side, the RTX 3060 Ti is closely matched with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014, +0.7% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361, -1.4% delta), indicating that its performance is in line with previous-generation high-end cards.
The combination's rank suggests that the GPU holds the system back from higher placements. While the CPU is near the top of its class, the GPU's mid-range position means the overall system performance is limited by graphics processing power, particularly at higher resolutions where the frame rate drops below 60 FPS at 4K with anything above Low settings.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Rust effectively, but the playable experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the system fully excels, with all presets from Low to Ultra averaging above 60 FPS. The best performance at this resolution is Ultra settings, delivering 75.6 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High, Medium, and Low presets, with High being the best option at 67.7 FPS. Ultra at 1440p falls short at 48.6 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the system is only playable on Low settings, achieving 70.1 FPS. All other presets at 4K fail to reach the 60 FPS threshold, with Medium at 45.9 FPS, High at 37.8 FPS, and Ultra at 32.5 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, capable of handling 1440p with some compromises, and only marginally viable at 4K with significant graphical reductions.
The 60 FPS playable threshold is consistently met at 1080p and 1440p (excluding Ultra at 1440p), but the system's limitations become apparent at 4K. For users seeking a high-refresh-rate experience, 1080p Low delivers 167.6 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play. For those prioritizing visual fidelity, 1080p Ultra at 75.6 FPS offers a balanced experience without sacrificing smoothness.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which produces an average of 75.6 FPS. This allows users to experience the game at maximum graphical quality while maintaining a comfortable frame rate. The margin of 15.6 FPS above the threshold provides some headroom for demanding scenes, though the data shows no minimum frame rate data to confirm stability.
At 2560x1440, the recommended preset is High, achieving an average of 67.7 FPS. This provides a high level of visual detail while remaining 7.7 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium and Low are also viable options for users seeking higher frame rates, with 77.6 FPS and 115.5 FPS respectively, but High represents the best balance of quality and performance.
At 3840x2160, the only playable preset is Low, delivering an average of 70.1 FPS. This is 10.1 FPS above the threshold, but it requires significant graphical compromises. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS, with 45.9, 37.8, and 32.5 FPS respectively, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay at 4K. Users who prioritize 4K resolution should stick to Low settings, while those who prioritize quality should consider dropping to 1440p.