Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 18 | 24 | 34 | 48 |
| 1440p QHD | 31 | 44 | 53 | 81 |
| 1080p Full HD | 49 | 62 | 76 | 114 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
Rust places a heavy burden on the graphics card, and the data for the Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 reflects that clearly. This combination delivers playable performance only at 1080p and 1440p, with specific preset limitations that must be respected. At 4K, the system falls short of the 60 FPS threshold across all tested settings, making that resolution unsuitable for smooth gameplay.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data for this combo shows a clear and consistent pattern: performance scales predictably with resolution and preset level, but the GTX 1070 becomes the limiting factor as pixel count rises.
At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are uniformly below the 60 FPS target. The Low preset averages 48.2 FPS, which is the highest recorded at this resolution. Medium drops to 33.6 FPS, High falls to 23.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 17.6 FPS. None of these averages approach playable territory, and the gap between Low and Ultra is a massive 30.6 FPS, indicating that the GPU cannot handle the pixel throughput required at 4K.
At 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves, but only the Low preset manages to clear the 60 FPS line. Low averages 81.1 FPS, a strong result that suggests headroom for competitive play. Medium averages 53.4 FPS, just short of the threshold. High drops to 44.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 31.0 FPS. The delta from Low to Ultra is 50.1 FPS, showing that preset choice at this resolution is critical for maintaining fluidity.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combination shows its best face. Low averages 114.3 FPS, which is excellent for fast-paced action. Medium averages 75.8 FPS, comfortably above 60. High averages 62.3 FPS, which just clears the threshold. Ultra, however, drops to 48.6 FPS, meaning even at the most common resolution, maxing out the settings is not viable. The spread from Low to Ultra is 65.7 FPS, underscoring that the GTX 1070 dictates the ceiling here.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the measured data, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS varies by resolution.
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The highest playable option does not exist, as even Low falls short at 48.2 FPS. Users at this resolution must accept significantly reduced frame rates or lower the resolution.
At 2560x1440, the best setting is Low, with an average of 81.1 FPS. This is the only preset at this resolution that meets the playable threshold. Medium at 53.4 FPS is close but fails to reach the target, so Low is the definitive choice for smooth gameplay.
At 1920x1080, the best setting is High, averaging 62.3 FPS. This is notable because it allows for relatively high visual quality while still staying above 60 FPS. Low and Medium also clear the threshold, with 114.3 and 75.8 FPS respectively, but High represents the optimal balance of fidelity and performance. Ultra is not viable at 48.6 FPS.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the dominant bottleneck in this pairing for Rust, especially at higher resolutions. The Intel Core i7-13700K is a high-end processor with a strong multi-threaded score of 30745 in Cinebench R23 and a single-thread score of 2116, but those capabilities are largely untapped when the GTX 1070 cannot keep up with the rendering load.
Evidence for this comes from the scaling between resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 114.3 FPS. When moving to 1440p Low, the frame rate drops to 81.1 FPS, a reduction of 29.0%. Moving from 1440p Low to 4K Low yields 48.2 FPS, another drop of 40.6%. This steep decline with increasing pixel count is a classic sign of GPU limitation, as the CPU is not being stressed proportionally.
Preset scaling further confirms this. At 1080p, going from Low to Ultra reduces the average from 114.3 to 48.6 FPS, a 57.5% loss. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rate would remain relatively flat across presets, as the CPU workload does not increase as dramatically as the GPU workload when raising visual details. The data shows the opposite, with large FPS swings that point squarely at the graphics card.
The CPU does matter for ensuring the GPU can reach its potential. The i7-13700K's high single-thread performance ensures that at lower resolutions like 1080p Low, it does not hold back the GTX 1070, allowing the frame rate to exceed 114 FPS. However, at 4K, the CPU's role diminishes entirely, as the GPU is rendering far fewer frames per second.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals in the database, both the CPU and GPU have close counterparts that would behave similarly in Rust.
For the Intel Core i7-13700K, the nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which has an average benchmark score that is 0.2% lower. This negligible delta means the Ryzen 9 5900 would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust, so the choice between these two CPUs would not alter the playability verdict. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is also within 0.3% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is 0.5% higher, all of which are effectively the same performance tier.
For the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, the nearest rival is the AMD FirePro W5000, which scores 0.2% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is 0.5% lower, while the NVIDIA Tesla M10 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 are 0.6% and 0.7% higher respectively. These deltas are so small that swapping in any of these GPUs would result in FPS differences of less than one frame per second in most scenarios. Users with any of these cards should expect the same resolution and preset limitations: playable at 1080p High and 1440p Low, but not at 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database's overall ranking of tested combinations for Rust, this pairing sits at rank 3078 out of 3723 combos. This places it in the lower percentile of tested systems, which is consistent with the GTX 1070 being an older, mid-range GPU relative to more modern hardware.
The rank reflects that while the CPU is very capable, the GPU drags the overall performance down. Many other combos in the database, even those with weaker CPUs but stronger GPUs, would outrank this pairing in Rust. The 645 combos ranked below this one likely feature even older or less capable graphics cards, but the data makes clear that this is not a top-tier configuration for this game.
The Verdict
Can this PC run Rust? Yes, but with strict limitations based on resolution.
At 3840x2160, the answer is no. No preset reaches 60 FPS, and the best average is 48.2 FPS on Low. The system is not suitable for 4K gameplay in Rust.
At 2560x1440, the answer is yes, but only on the Low preset, which delivers 81.1 FPS. This is playable and provides a smooth experience, though visual fidelity is reduced. Medium at 53.4 FPS is not recommended for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.
At 1920x1080, the answer is a qualified yes. The High preset averages 62.3 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS threshold, and Low and Medium also work well. Ultra, however, is not playable at 48.6 FPS. For the best experience at 1080p, users should stick to High or lower settings.
In summary, this combination is viable for Rust at 1440p Low and 1080p High, but 4K is out of reach. The GTX 1070 is the bottleneck, and users seeking higher settings at 1440p or 4K would need a more powerful GPU. The i7-13700K provides ample CPU headroom, but the graphics card limits the overall experience to mid-range performance.