Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 51 | 57 | 89 |
| 1440p QHD | 65 | 85 | 98 | 144 |
| 1080p Full HD | 94 | 120 | 144 | 214 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a strongly playable Rust experience at 1080p and 1440p, but the data shows that 4K gaming requires significant compromises. At 1920x1080, the combination produces an average of 94.4 FPS at Ultra settings, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold, while at 2560x1440, Ultra settings still manage 65.4 FPS. The picture changes at 3840x2160, where Ultra settings drop to 39.4 FPS and High settings only reach 50.9 FPS, making Low settings the only viable option for smooth 4K play at 88.6 FPS. This analysis is based on measured data, with the combo ranking 1029th out of 3723 tested combinations in Rust.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combination covers three resolutions and four quality presets, providing a complete picture of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the results are uniformly strong. Low settings produce an average of 214.4 FPS, which is more than three times the playability threshold. Medium settings still deliver 144.3 FPS, High settings come in at 120.3 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra preset holds 94.4 FPS. This means that at 1080p, the system has substantial headroom across the entire settings range, and competitive players could push frame rates far beyond what a 60 Hz display requires.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains commendable but shows the expected scaling pressure. Low settings yield 144 FPS, which is a 32.8% reduction from the 1080p Low result, yet still double the 60 FPS target. Medium settings average 97.6 FPS, High settings reach 85.2 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 65.4 FPS. The Ultra figure is particularly noteworthy because it barely clears the 60 FPS threshold, meaning that 1440p Ultra is playable but leaves little margin for demanding scenes or background processes. High settings at 1440p offer a more comfortable buffer at 85.2 FPS, which is 42% faster than the Ultra preset.
At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens considerably. Low settings produce 88.6 FPS, which is still comfortably above 60 FPS, but Medium settings fall to 56.7 FPS, just under the threshold. High settings manage 50.9 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 39.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 49.2 FPS, highlighting how much headroom the lower preset provides. The data indicates that 4K gaming is possible with this combo, but only by sacrificing visual fidelity through the Low preset, which delivers 75.4% more FPS than the Medium preset.
The scaling pattern across resolutions is consistent: the RX 9070's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth handles 1080p and 1440p with ease, but 4K Ultra demands more than the GPU can deliver at playable frame rates. The 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 128 ROPs are sufficient for lower resolutions, yet the 4K Ultra figure of 39.4 FPS suggests that pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 2560x1440?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings is 65.4 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. The verdict data lists Ultra as the best playable setting at this resolution, with an average FPS of 65.4.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 4K gaming with this hardware?
A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 88.6 FPS. Medium settings fall to 56.7 FPS, which is below the playability threshold, so Low is the recommended choice for 4K.
Q: How does the combo rank among all tested hardware combinations in Rust?
A: This combination ranks 1029th out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the top 27.6% of all systems evaluated. The data indicates that this is a solidly upper-tier configuration for Rust, though not at the very top of the leaderboard.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1920x1080 with High settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 120.3 FPS. This is 100.5% above the 60 FPS playability threshold, providing ample headroom for smooth gameplay. Even Ultra settings at 1080p deliver 94.4 FPS.
Q: Is the 4K High preset playable, and if not, how far off is it?
A: The 4K High preset averages 50.9 FPS, which is 9.1 FPS below the 60 FPS playability threshold. This represents a 15.2% shortfall, meaning the system cannot maintain smooth play at this settings level without adjustments.
Q: How much performance is lost between Low and Ultra settings at 2560x1440?
A: The difference between Low (144 FPS) and Ultra (65.4 FPS) at 1440p is 78.6 FPS, which is a 54.6% reduction. This illustrates the significant rendering cost of the Ultra preset's increased visual effects and draw distances in Rust.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-13700K provide context for its processing capability in this build. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores an average of 46971, which is 0.2% lower than the i7-13700K's 46881 average benchmark score, making them effectively equivalent in CPU performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, a 0.3% difference, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654, a 0.5% difference, and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 scores 46653, also 0.5% lower. These four processors would all deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust, meaning that swapping to any of them would produce negligible changes in frame rates.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 9070's nearest rivals show more variation. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 23736, which is 0.6% lower than the RX 9070's 23877 average benchmark score, making it a very close match despite its older architecture. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24063, 0.8% higher, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23628, 1.1% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, 1.2% higher. These GPU alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust, with differences of only a few FPS at most. A system built with the i7-13700K and an RTX 2080 SUPER would likely see 4K Ultra performance around 39 FPS, while the RX 6800S pairing would marginally improve on the RX 9070's results.
For gamers considering alternative builds, the data suggests that the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in Rust. The i7-13700K's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 16 cores with 24 threads provide strong single-threaded performance, as indicated by its 4333 Passmark single-thread score, which is critical for Rust's simulation-heavy gameplay. The GPU, however, is the bottleneck at higher resolutions, so upgrading to a stronger GPU would yield larger FPS gains than switching to a faster CPU within the same performance tier.
The Verdict
The data clearly answers whether this PC can run Rust: yes, at 1080p and 1440p, but with caveats at 4K. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 94.4 FPS. This resolution offers the best experience, allowing players to enable maximum visual quality while maintaining a 57.3% margin above the playability threshold. At 2560x1440, all settings also remain playable, but Ultra is the only preset that dips close to the threshold at 65.4 FPS, which is 9% above 60 FPS. High settings at 1440p provide a more comfortable 85.2 FPS, making them a safer choice for consistent frame times.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more restrictive. Only the Low preset achieves playable frame rates, with an average of 88.6 FPS. Medium settings fall to 56.7 FPS, which is 5.5% below the 60 FPS threshold, and High settings drop further to 50.9 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K are not viable at 39.4 FPS. For 4K gamers, the Low preset is the only option that meets the playability standard, and even then, the visual quality reduction is substantial. The verdict data confirms that 4K Low is the best playable setting, with an average FPS of 88.6.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 9070 ranks 1029th out of 3723 tested combinations in Rust, placing it in the 72.4th percentile of all systems evaluated. This rank indicates that the combo is above average but not elite, with roughly 27.6% of tested systems performing better. The CPU's percentile rank among all CPUs is 89, meaning it outperforms 89% of processors, while the GPU's percentile rank among all GPUs is 69, showing that the graphics card is the weaker link in this pairing.
The gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles is notable: the i7-13700K is a top-tier processor, while the RX 9070 is a solidly mid-to-upper-tier GPU. In Rust, which is known for being CPU-intensive due to its large multiplayer servers and complex entity interactions, the strong CPU helps maintain stable frame rates, but the GPU still limits maximum performance at higher resolutions. The 1029th rank reflects this balanced but not exceptional overall performance. For context, the combo sits in the same performance band as systems using the RTX 3080 Mobile or RTX 2080 SUPER, based on the GPU's nearest rivals, though the CPU advantage may push it slightly higher in CPU-bound scenes.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 94.4 FPS. This gives players the full visual experience with a comfortable 57.3% margin above the playability threshold. For those seeking maximum frame rates, Low settings deliver 214.4 FPS, but Ultra is the recommended choice for balanced quality and performance.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings remain playable at 65.4 FPS, making it the best choice for visual quality. However, the 9% margin above 60 FPS is thin, so players who prioritize consistency may prefer High settings at 85.2 FPS, which offers a 42% margin. The data indicates that Ultra is technically the best playable setting, but High provides a more robust experience.
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that clears 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 88.6 FPS. Medium settings at 56.7 FPS are not playable by the 60 FPS standard, so Low is the only option. This represents a significant visual downgrade from the other resolutions, but the 88.6 FPS figure ensures smooth gameplay. Players who insist on 4K with this combo must accept Low settings, while those who prefer higher quality should consider dropping to 1440p.