Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 52 | 59 | 92 |
| 1440p QHD | 66 | 91 | 106 | 158 |
| 1080p Full HD | 95 | 127 | 150 | 226 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a broad range of performance in Rust, scaling from a comfortable 94.9 FPS average at 1080p Ultra to a more constrained 37.9 FPS at 4K Ultra. The measured data, which includes average FPS only for each resolution and preset combination, shows that this combo is highly capable at standard gaming resolutions but requires preset adjustments to hit the 60 FPS playable threshold at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS results, the division of labor between the CPU and GPU, optimal settings per resolution, and how this specific pairing compares to other tested hardware configurations.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark results for Rust are measured across three resolutions and four quality presets, providing a clear picture of performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the system shows its highest raw output. On the Low preset, the average FPS is 225.5. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 149.6 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 126.8 FPS, while the Ultra preset, the most demanding at this resolution, still maintains a robust 94.9 FPS average. None of the 1080p results fall below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating a strong performance headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the increased load on the GPU. The Low preset delivers an average of 157.7 FPS, which is a significant jump from the 1080p Low result, suggesting less CPU bottleneck at this higher resolution. The Medium preset averages 106 FPS, and High comes in at 90.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p produces an average of 65.9 FPS, which is still above the playable threshold but with less margin than at 1080p. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 30% reduction in FPS for the Ultra preset, from 94.9 to 65.9, which is typical for a resolution increase that nearly doubles the pixel count.
The 3840x2160 results present the most significant challenge for this hardware. The Low preset at 4K averages 92.1 FPS, which is playable. The Medium preset drops to 58.5 FPS, just shy of the 60 FPS target. High settings average 51.5 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 37.9 FPS. This steep decline from 1440p to 4K, particularly on higher presets, illustrates the immense pixel-pushing demand of 4K rendering. The difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 4K is a 54.2 FPS swing, highlighting how much graphical fidelity costs in this scenario.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data indicates a clear shift in system bottleneck depending on the resolution. At 1920x1080, the performance difference between presets is substantial; for instance, the Low preset at 225.5 FPS is more than double the Ultra preset's 94.9 FPS. This wide gap suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU and GPU are both under load, but the GPU is the primary limiter when settings are increased, as more shading and post-processing work is pushed to it. The high average FPS on Low also suggests the Intel Core i7-12700KF has enough headroom to feed the GPU efficiently at this resolution.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more dominant. The scaling from 1080p Low (225.5 FPS) to 1440p Low (157.7 FPS) shows a 30% decrease, which is more than the pure pixel count difference but indicates that the GPU is now the primary bottleneck. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p (157.7 vs 65.9 FPS) is still large, but the overall frame rates are lower, showing that the RTX 4070 is working harder. The CPU's influence is still present, but the GPU is clearly the limiting factor for achieving higher frame rates at higher settings.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The performance drop is dramatic across all presets. The difference between 1440p Ultra (65.9 FPS) and 4K Ultra (37.9 FPS) is a 42% reduction, which is a larger drop than the pixel count increase alone, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are saturated. The CPU's role at 4K is diminished; it is likely not the limiting factor in any scenario at this resolution, as even the Low preset (92.1 FPS) shows the GPU can still be pushed. The data suggests that for this game, at 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 4070 is the main component to watch, while at 4K, its limits are the defining constraint.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra. The measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 94.9. This means users can enable the highest graphical settings and still have a significant performance buffer above the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra. The average FPS at 1440p Ultra is 65.9, which clears the 60 FPS mark, though with less headroom than at 1080p. This makes Ultra the optimal choice for this resolution, as it provides the best visual quality while maintaining a playable frame rate.
For 3840x2160, the situation changes. The only preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low. The average FPS at 4K Low is 92.1. The next preset, Medium, falls to 58.5 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. Therefore, Low is the recommended setting for a smooth 4K experience, as higher presets would require accepting frame rates below 60 FPS.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-12700KF is closely matched with several other processors. The Intel Core i7-13700T has an average benchmark score of 35403, which is a 0.1% difference from the 12700KF's score. Similarly, the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, a 0.2% delta. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, a -0.2% delta, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, a 0.2% delta. These results indicate that in CPU-bound scenarios, users would see nearly identical performance with any of these chips, as the benchmark score differences are minimal.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070's nearest rivals show more variance in average benchmark scores, but still within a tight band. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628, a 0.1% delta from the RTX 4070's 37648. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, a 0.4% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, a -1.3% delta, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, a 1.3% delta. These close margins suggest that in GPU-bound scenarios, the RTX 4070 would perform similarly to these alternatives, with the RTX 4080 Mobile being the closest competitor in terms of raw score, though it is a mobile part.
The Verdict
Based on the verdictByResolution data, this PC configuration can run Rust, but the playable settings vary by resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 94.9 FPS. This is a clear pass for 1080p gaming. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, with Ultra being the best option at 65.9 FPS. This is also a pass, though with less headroom. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset is playable, with an average of 92.1 FPS. The Medium preset at 58.5 FPS and High at 51.5 FPS are below the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra at 37.9 FPS is not viable for smooth gameplay. Therefore, for 4K, the system is playable only on Low settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1080p with the highest settings?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 94.9, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The Ultra preset is the best option at 2560x1440. It maintains an average of 65.9 FPS, which is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?
A: Yes, but only with the Low preset. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 92.1 FPS. Medium settings drop to 58.5 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.
Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its nearest rival?
A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T, scores 35403, a difference of -0.1%. This indicates nearly identical CPU performance.
Q: How does the GPU performance compare to its nearest rival?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37648. The closest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with a score of 37628, a 0.1% delta, meaning performance is essentially the same.
Q: What resolution provides the highest frame rate?
A: The highest average FPS is at 1920x1080 with the Low preset, which achieves 225.5 FPS. This is the maximum measured performance in the data.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 ranks 809 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the top 22% of all tested configurations, indicating a strong overall performance level. The high ranking is consistent with the measured FPS results, which show that the system can handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and can manage 4K only on the lowest settings. This rank reflects a well-balanced pairing that is suitable for most gaming scenarios, with the primary limitation being the GPU's capability at 4K Ultra settings. The data confirms that this is a high-performing setup for a game like Rust, which can be demanding on both CPU and GPU resources.