Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

85%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
212 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
93 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
145 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
61 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
84 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
37 FPS
8.3ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,877

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 51 61 84
1440p QHD 61 81 101 145
1080p Full HD 93 120 146 212

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 120
1920x1080 Low 212
1920x1080 Medium 146
1920x1080 Ultra 93
2560x1440 High 81
2560x1440 Low 145
2560x1440 Medium 101
2560x1440 Ultra 61
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Low 84
3840x2160 Medium 61
3840x2160 Ultra 37

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a highly capable Rust experience across all common resolutions, with the data showing that 1080p and 1440p gaming are thoroughly covered while 4K requires some settings adjustment to maintain smooth gameplay. This combination ranks in the 1048th position out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the upper third of all systems evaluated for this title. The measured frame rates reveal a system that scales predictably with resolution and preset changes, offering clear guidance for players seeking the optimal balance between visual fidelity and performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers an average of 60.7 FPS. The data shows that High settings at this resolution drop to 51.4 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS playability threshold, while Ultra settings produce an even lower 37.1 FPS. Low settings at 4K achieve 84.3 FPS, indicating that players prioritizing frame rate over visuals have a comfortable margin at the lowest preset.

For 2560x1440, the best settings that maintain 60 FPS or higher are Ultra, with an average of 60.6 FPS. This is a tight squeeze above the threshold, but it clears the bar. High settings at this resolution reach 81.4 FPS, Medium achieves 100.7 FPS, and Low produces a very high 144.9 FPS. The fact that Ultra barely crosses 60 FPS at 1440p while High sits comfortably above 80 FPS suggests that players can choose between maximum visual quality with a slim margin or slightly reduced settings for a more substantial performance buffer.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are also Ultra, delivering an average of 93.3 FPS. This gives players a significant cushion above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings reach 120.4 FPS, Medium achieves 145.5 FPS, and Low produces an exceptionally high 212 FPS. The 1080p results show that this combination has ample headroom at every preset, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1048 out of 3723 tested configurations places this system in the 72nd percentile of all combinations evaluated for Rust. This indicates that the i7-12700KF and RX 9070 pairing outperforms roughly 72% of the systems tested in this game, a strong showing for a mid-to-high-end desktop configuration. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU's 85th percentile standing among all processors and the GPU's 69th percentile among all graphics cards, suggesting that the CPU has more relative headroom than the GPU in this pairing.

The data implies that while this combo is not at the absolute top tier of performance, it sits comfortably in the upper echelon, with the CPU contributing more to the system's overall standing than the GPU. This rank also suggests that the system is well-matched for Rust specifically, as the game's performance characteristics may favor the CPU's strengths more than the GPU's.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured average FPS values are as follows: Low produces 84.3 FPS, Medium achieves 60.7 FPS, High reaches 51.4 FPS, and Ultra delivers 37.1 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with the largest drop occurring between Medium and High, a reduction of 9.3 FPS, and an even larger drop between High and Ultra, a reduction of 14.3 FPS. This pattern suggests that the 4K resolution places significant stress on the GPU, with the higher presets demanding more than the RX 9070 can comfortably provide.

At 2560x1440, the measured average FPS values are: Low at 144.9 FPS, Medium at 100.7 FPS, High at 81.4 FPS, and Ultra at 60.6 FPS. The scaling here is more gradual, with differences of 44.2 FPS between Low and Medium, 19.3 FPS between Medium and High, and 20.8 FPS between High and Ultra. This resolution strikes a better balance, with all presets remaining playable and the gap between the lowest and highest settings being 84.3 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values are: Low at 212 FPS, Medium at 145.5 FPS, High at 120.4 FPS, and Ultra at 93.3 FPS. The performance at this resolution is exceptional across the board, with even the most demanding preset exceeding 90 FPS. The differences between presets are 66.5 FPS between Low and Medium, 25.1 FPS between Medium and High, and 27.1 FPS between High and Ultra. The 1080p results indicate that this resolution is where the combo truly shines, providing enough performance for high refresh rate displays even at maximum settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 60 FPS in 4K?

A: Yes, but only at Low and Medium settings. The data shows Low produces 84.3 FPS and Medium produces 60.7 FPS at 3840x2160, both clearing the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra settings fall short at 51.4 FPS and 37.1 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra settings are playable at 2560x1440, achieving 60.6 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for this resolution, with all lower presets also exceeding the threshold.

Q: How does the combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 1048 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the top 72% of all configurations evaluated for this game.

Q: Which component is more responsible for this system's performance?

A: The CPU has a higher percentile ranking at 85 among all CPUs compared to the GPU's 69 percentile among all GPUs, suggesting the processor contributes more to the system's overall performance in Rust.

Q: Is 1080p Ultra settings viable for this system?

A: Yes, the data shows 93.3 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold and suitable for high refresh rate displays.

Q: What is the largest FPS drop between presets at 4K?

A: The largest drop at 3840x2160 occurs between High and Ultra settings, where the average FPS falls from 51.4 to 37.1, a reduction of 14.3 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals distinct patterns regarding which component matters more at each resolution. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, as evidenced by the sharp performance decline when moving from Low to Ultra settings. The spread of 47.2 FPS between the lowest and highest presets at 4K indicates that the RX 9070's rendering capabilities are the primary constraint, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance being less relevant at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts somewhat, with the spread between presets being 84.3 FPS. The fact that Ultra settings barely clear 60 FPS while Low produces nearly 145 FPS suggests that the GPU is still the limiting factor, but the CPU's contribution becomes more apparent as the resolution decreases. The 1440p results show a more even distribution of performance across presets, indicating that both components are being utilized more fully.

At 1920x1080, the CPU's role becomes more prominent, though the GPU still matters significantly. The spread of 118.7 FPS between Low and Ultra at 1080p is the largest of any resolution, but the absolute performance levels are high enough that neither component becomes a bottleneck for playability. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838, suggest that it can easily feed the GPU at this resolution. The scaling between resolutions — with 1080p Ultra producing 93.3 FPS compared to 1440p Ultra's 60.6 FPS — indicates a 54% performance drop when moving up one resolution tier, which is consistent with the GPU being the primary driver of frame rates in this game.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Rust, and the data shows it does so with confidence across most settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, with Ultra settings achieving 93.3 FPS and Low settings reaching 212 FPS. This makes 1080p gaming fully viable for any settings preference, including maximum visual quality on high refresh rate monitors.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is also positive, with all four presets — Low at 144.9 FPS, Medium at 100.7 FPS, High at 81.4 FPS, and Ultra at 60.6 FPS — exceeding the 60 FPS threshold. Players at this resolution can choose any preset and remain playable, though Ultra's slim margin above 60 FPS suggests that High settings may be preferable for those who want a more consistent frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The system can run the game at Low (84.3 FPS) and Medium (60.7 FPS) settings, both clearing the 60 FPS threshold. However, High (51.4 FPS) and Ultra (37.1 FPS) fall below playable levels. The recommended best settings for 4K is Medium, which provides the highest visual quality while maintaining playability with a 60.7 FPS average.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i7-13700T has an average benchmark score of 35403, which is 0.1% lower than the i7-12700KF's score of 35365 (as expressed by the -0.1 deltaPct). The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, a 0.2% difference, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, also a -0.2% delta. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, a 0.2% difference. These four processors are all within a narrow performance band of the i7-12700KF, meaning any of them would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust when paired with the RX 9070.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals tell a similar story. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z has an average score of 23736, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 9070's score of 23877. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24063, a -0.8% delta, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23628, a 1.1% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, a -1.2% delta. These four graphics cards are all within a small performance margin of the RX 9070, suggesting that swapping in any of them would result in very similar Rust performance. The tight clustering of these rivals — all within roughly 1% of the RX 9070's average score — indicates a highly competitive performance tier where no single card has a meaningful advantage.