Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

97%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
236 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
107 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
168 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
71 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
98 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
46 FPS
7.1ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 35,287
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 40,377

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 46 54 63 98
1440p QHD 71 95 112 168
1080p Full HD 107 140 162 236

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 140
1920x1080 Low 236
1920x1080 Medium 162
1920x1080 Ultra 107
2560x1440 High 95
2560x1440 Low 168
2560x1440 Medium 112
2560x1440 Ultra 71
3840x2160 High 54
3840x2160 Low 98
3840x2160 Medium 63
3840x2160 Ultra 46

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a strong performance profile for Rust, but the experience is heavily dictated by resolution. At 4K, the system hits a wall at the Ultra preset, while at 1440p and 1080p, it clears the 60 FPS threshold with significant headroom at even the most demanding settings. The data indicates this combination is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming, where it provides a substantial performance buffer.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is Medium, which achieves an average of 63.3 FPS. The High preset drops to 54.2 FPS, falling below the playable threshold, and Ultra is even more demanding at 45.8 FPS. Only the Low preset, at 97.9 FPS, offers a more comfortable margin, but Medium is the optimal choice for balancing visual fidelity with performance.

At 2560x1440, the system can handle the Ultra preset while staying above 60 FPS, recording an average of 70.6 FPS. This is a significant achievement, as it allows for maximum graphical settings without compromising smooth gameplay. The High preset runs at 94.9 FPS, Medium at 111.6 FPS, and Low at 168.2 FPS, all of which are well above the threshold.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is also the best choice, delivering an average of 107.1 FPS. This provides a very smooth experience with all settings maxed out. The High preset reaches 139.7 FPS, Medium hits 161.9 FPS, and Low achieves 235.5 FPS, showcasing the substantial headroom available at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in system bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's influence is more pronounced, as the frame rates scale dramatically with lower graphical settings. The jump from Ultra (107.1 FPS) to Low (235.5 FPS) represents a 128.4 FPS increase, indicating that the GPU is not fully taxed at the lower settings, allowing the processor to push more frames. This suggests that the Intel Core i7-12700K, with its 12 cores and 20 threads, is capable of feeding the RTX 5070 efficiently at this resolution.

As resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU begins to take on a more significant role. The scaling from Low (168.2 FPS) to Ultra (70.6 FPS) shows a 97.6 FPS drop, which is a smaller absolute change than at 1080p but still indicates a growing GPU workload. The system remains balanced, with the CPU still able to deliver high frame rates even at the Ultra preset.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The performance difference between Low (97.9 FPS) and Ultra (45.8 FPS) is 52.1 FPS, and the fact that High (54.2 FPS) and Ultra (45.8 FPS) both fall below 60 FPS shows that the RTX 5070 is the limiting component. The CPU's role diminishes, as the GPU's rendering workload at 3840x2160 becomes the primary constraint on performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the data shows a clear progression of performance based on settings. The Low preset averages 97.9 FPS, providing a very playable experience. The Medium preset averages 63.3 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset drops to 54.2 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 45.8 FPS, both of which are below the playable threshold. This indicates that 4K gaming is only viable at Medium settings or lower for a consistent 60 FPS experience.

At 2560x1440, the performance is robust across all settings. The Low preset averages 168.2 FPS, offering an exceptionally smooth experience. The Medium preset averages 111.6 FPS, and the High preset averages 94.9 FPS. Even the Ultra preset maintains an average of 70.6 FPS, which is comfortably above the playable threshold. This resolution is the sweet spot for this hardware combination.

At 1920x1080, the results are outstanding. The Low preset achieves an average of 235.5 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play. The Medium preset averages 161.9 FPS, and the High preset averages 139.7 FPS. The Ultra preset still delivers a very high 107.1 FPS, ensuring that even the most graphically intensive settings provide a fluid experience. The minimum and maximum FPS values are not available in the data, but the average figures alone demonstrate the system's capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest quality preset I can use at 4K to stay above 60 FPS?

A: The Medium preset is the most demanding option that maintains a playable frame rate, with an average of 63.3 FPS at 3840x2160.

Q: Can this PC run Rust at Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440 the Ultra preset achieves an average of 70.6 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 235.5 FPS, which is 128.4 FPS higher than the Ultra preset's average of 107.1 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary constraint at 3840x2160, as even the High preset (54.2 FPS) and Ultra preset (45.8 FPS) fail to reach 60 FPS, indicating a rendering workload limit rather than a processing one.

Q: What is the best resolution for this system in Rust?

A: The data indicates that 2560x1440 is the optimal resolution, as it allows for Ultra settings at 70.6 FPS, providing both high visual quality and a solid frame rate.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K on High settings?

A: No, the High preset at 3840x2160 averages 54.2 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i7-12700K has a benchmark score of 35287 and an average benchmark score of 35287, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are extremely close in performance. The Intel Core i5-13600T has an average score of 35305, which is a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i7-13700T achieves 35403, a 0.3% difference. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, a 0.4% difference. In practical terms, these processors would perform nearly identically in Rust, with the performance delta being negligible.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, the average benchmark score is 40377, and it sits in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a similarly tight grouping of scores. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 has an average score of 40318, which is a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063, a 0.8% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 achieves 40870, a 1.2% difference. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, a 2% difference. These alternatives would deliver a very similar frame rate experience in Rust, with differences that are unlikely to be noticeable in gameplay.

The Verdict

The benchmark data confirms that the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination is a capable system for running Rust, but the playable settings vary significantly by resolution. At 3840x2160, the system can run the game at Medium settings with an average of 63.3 FPS, which is just above the playable threshold. The High and Ultra presets are not recommended for 4K, as they fall below 60 FPS at 54.2 and 45.8 FPS, respectively.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is highly positive. All four presets, including Ultra, maintain an average above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset achieves 70.6 FPS, providing a great balance of visual quality and performance. This makes 1440p the ideal resolution for this hardware.

At 1920x1080, the system excels. Every preset runs at an average well above 60 FPS, with the Ultra preset delivering 107.1 FPS and the Low preset reaching 235.5 FPS. This resolution offers maximum flexibility, allowing users to prioritize frame rate or visual fidelity without concern. Overall, this PC can run Rust effectively at all tested resolutions, with the caveat that 4K users must be willing to lower settings to Medium for a consistent 60 FPS experience.