Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 136 | 154 | 172 | 206 |
| 1440p QHD | 203 | 230 | 257 | 307 |
| 1080p Full HD | 269 | 305 | 342 | 408 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers exceptional performance in Rust, ranking 3rd out of 3,723 tested combinations. This is a top-tier setup that obliterates the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution and preset, with even the most demanding configuration at 4K Ultra averaging 136 FPS. The data indicates a system with massive headroom, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p and smooth 4K gameplay without compromise. Benchmark results show this combo is not merely playable but overwhelmingly dominant, with performance scaling that suggests the CPU becomes a limiting factor only at lower resolutions and high frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces frame rates that exceed the refresh rate of most monitors. The Low preset averages 408 FPS, which is the highest recorded value across all tests. The Medium preset averages 342 FPS, with a minimum of 290 FPS and a maximum of 393 FPS, showing excellent consistency. High settings yield an average of 305 FPS, while Ultra drops to an average of 269 FPS. Even at the lowest recorded figure — the Medium preset's 290 FPS minimum — performance is more than four times the playability threshold. This resolution is clearly GPU-bound in the sense that the CPU has ample headroom, but the sheer frame rates indicate neither component is strained.
Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates remain exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 307 FPS, just slightly below the 1080p Low result, indicating minimal resolution scaling impact at this level. Medium averages 257 FPS with a minimum of 219 FPS and a maximum of 296 FPS. High settings produce an average of 230 FPS, while Ultra averages 203 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows roughly a 20-25% reduction in average FPS across presets, which is modest given the 77% increase in pixel count. This suggests the RTX 4080 has substantial bandwidth and compute reserves, with the 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance proving sufficient for this workload.
At 3840x2160, the performance remains remarkably strong. The Low preset averages 206 FPS, which is still well above what most 4K displays can display. Medium averages 172 FPS with a minimum of 146 FPS and a maximum of 198 FPS. High settings average 154 FPS, and Ultra averages 136 FPS. The gap between 1440p and 4K is more pronounced — roughly 33-35% lower average FPS — which is expected given the 2.25x pixel count increase from 1440p to 4K. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium (146 FPS) is still 86 FPS above the playability threshold, demonstrating that even transient drops do not approach problematic levels. The data shows a smooth degradation curve with no anomalous dips, indicating a well-balanced system.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are extremely close in aggregate score. The Intel Core i7-12700K has an average benchmark score of 35,287, while the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35,305, a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35,365 (-0.2%), the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35,403 (-0.3%), and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35,428 (-0.4%). These deltas are negligible — within 0.4% of each other — meaning that in Rust, swapping the i7-12700K for any of these processors would produce virtually identical frame rates. The i7-12700KF is architecturally the same chip without integrated graphics, so its near-identical score is expected. The i5-13600T and i7-13700T are both lower-power variants, yet their benchmark parity indicates that thermal constraints do not significantly impact Rust's CPU demands, which are primarily single-threaded and lightly threaded.
For the GPU, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER with an average score of 54,209, a delta of +0.1% relative to the RTX 4080's 54,247. This means the SUPER variant performs within a rounding error of the standard 4080 in Rust. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828 (-1.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698 (-2.6%), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757 (-2.7%). These deltas are small, but they are negative, meaning the RTX 4080 actually scores lower than these AMD alternatives in the aggregate GPU benchmark. However, in-game performance for Rust may differ from synthetic scores, as the game's engine may favor NVIDIA's architecture. Users considering a comparable build should expect the RTX 4080 SUPER to deliver nearly identical FPS, while the AMD options would be within a few percent in general compute but may show different scaling in this specific title.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra presets is 139 FPS (408 vs. 269), while the difference between 1080p and 4K at Ultra is 133 FPS (269 vs. 136). This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU are both heavily engaged, with the CPU capable of feeding the GPU enough data to reach very high frame rates. The i7-12700K's strong single-thread performance — evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,043 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,850.5 — ensures it does not become a severe constraint at lower resolutions.
At 2560x1440, the scaling between Low and Ultra is 104 FPS (307 vs. 203), which is a smaller absolute gap than at 1080p. This indicates the GPU is beginning to take on more of the workload, as the increased pixel count demands more from the RTX 4080. The 4K results reinforce this trend: the Low to Ultra gap at 4K is 70 FPS (206 vs. 136), showing that GPU load is dominant. The RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 256-bit bus provide ample bandwidth, but the fill rate and shading throughput become the limiting factors at higher resolutions.
The CPU's role is most pronounced at 1080p Low, where the 408 FPS average suggests the processor is near its maximum frame-generation capability for this game engine. The passmark single-thread score of 4,013 and the 3DMark max-threads score of 9,979 indicate strong per-core and multi-core performance, but Rust's simulation and network code likely benefit from the 12 cores and 20 threads. At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor, as the CPU has more than enough headroom to feed the RTX 4080 at 136-206 FPS. For users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors at 1440p, the system is balanced; at 4K, the GPU determines the experience.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Rust at 4K Ultra with playable frame rates?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 136 FPS, which is 76 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The system has significant headroom even at the most demanding settings.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?
A: The highest average FPS is 408, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is more than 6.8 times the playable threshold of 60 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER?
A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209, a delta of 0.1%. In practical terms, they perform identically, and users should not expect any measurable FPS difference in Rust.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important at 2560x1440?
A: At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the more significant factor. The average FPS drops from 307 at Low to 203 at Ultra, a 104 FPS swing, which is primarily driven by GPU workload. The CPU still has headroom, as evidenced by the high frame rates at Low settings.
Q: Does this combo ever drop below 60 FPS?
A: No. The lowest recorded minimum FPS is 146 at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. All other minimum FPS values are higher, and the lowest average FPS across all tests is 136 at 4K Ultra. The system never approaches the playability threshold.
Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems?
A: The combo ranks 3rd out of 3,723 tested combinations in the database for Rust. This places it in the top 0.1% of all tested systems.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination ranks 3rd out of 3,723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the 99.9th percentile of all systems tested. This is an extraordinary result, indicating that only two other CPU-GPU pairings in the entire database produced higher average frame rates. The rank is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows the system exceeding 400 FPS at 1080p Low and maintaining over 200 FPS at 1440p Ultra. The i7-12700K's 84th percentile score among all CPUs and the RTX 4080's 86th percentile among all GPUs combine to produce a synergistic result that outperforms many combinations with individually higher-ranked components. This suggests that Rust's specific engine characteristics favor this pairing — likely the CPU's strong single-thread performance combined with the GPU's high rasterization throughput. The rank also reflects the system's consistency: there are no weak points at any resolution or preset, which is rare even among high-end systems. For context, the CPU's nearest rivals are within 0.4% in synthetic benchmarks, yet the combo's rank indicates that the i7-12700K's specific cache hierarchy (25 MB L3) and clock behavior (5.0 GHz boost) are well-suited to Rust's demands.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which delivers an average FPS of 269. This is 209 FPS above the playability threshold, and the high frame rate makes it suitable for 240Hz monitors. The Ultra preset at 1080p still provides a 44 FPS buffer over the next lower preset (High at 305 FPS is technically higher, but Ultra is the maximum quality setting). Since the system easily exceeds 60 FPS, there is no reason to sacrifice visual quality.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best setting, averaging 203 FPS. This is 143 FPS above the playability threshold and comfortably supports 144Hz and 165Hz displays. The gap between Ultra (203 FPS) and High (230 FPS) is 27 FPS, but the visual fidelity improvement from High to Ultra is worth the modest frame rate reduction for most users.
At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the best setting, with an average of 136 FPS. This is 76 FPS above the playability threshold, providing a smooth experience on 120Hz 4K displays. The difference between Ultra (136 FPS) and High (154 FPS) is 18 FPS, but both are well above 60 FPS. Given that the minimum FPS at 4K Medium is 146, and the Ultra average is 136, there is no risk of dropping below playable levels even during intense scenes. The data supports using Ultra at all resolutions, as the RTX 4080's 16 GB memory and 48.74 TFLOPS compute capacity are sufficient to maintain high frame rates without compromise.