Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

76%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
137 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
60 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
97 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
42 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
55 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
25 FPS
12.7ms Frame Time
19ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 35,287
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 18,093

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 32 41 55
1440p QHD 42 55 66 97
1080p Full HD 60 79 89 137

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 79
1920x1080 Low 137
1920x1080 Medium 89
1920x1080 Ultra 60
2560x1440 High 55
2560x1440 Low 97
2560x1440 Medium 66
2560x1440 Ultra 42
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 55
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 Ultra 25

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i7-12700K sits in a tightly grouped performance band relative to its nearest rivals in the database. The closest match is the Intel Core i5-13600T, which posts an average benchmark score of 35305, a mere 0.1% lower than the i7-12700K's average of 35287. This delta is effectively negligible, meaning the two CPUs should deliver nearly identical frame pacing in Rust. The Intel Core i7-12700KF is next, scoring 35365, which is 0.2% higher; given that the KF variant lacks integrated graphics but otherwise shares the same architecture, the performance delta is within measurement noise. The Intel Core i7-13700T follows at 35403, 0.3% above the i7-12700K, and the Intel Core 5 213PE rounds out the group at 35428, 0.4% higher. For practical purposes, any of these alternatives would produce indistinguishable results in game, so users upgrading from one to another should expect no measurable change in Rust's frame pacing or average FPS.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER sits at an average benchmark score of 18093, with the closest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile at 18159, which is 0.4% faster. This is a slim margin, and in a game like Rust, which is heavily CPU-bound at lower resolutions, the difference may be even less apparent. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, 0.5% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 460 posts a score of 18373, 1.5% higher; the Intel Arc A770M reaches 18383, 1.6% higher. Although these GPUs technically outpace the RTX 2060 SUPER in aggregate benchmarks, the percentile gap is small enough that the user would not notice a difference in gameplay. For the RTX 2060 SUPER, the data shows that the nearest rivals are all within a 2% band, meaning that swapping to any of them would not materially change the Rust experience.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER run Rust at 4K resolution?

A: Based on measured FPS, no. At 3840x2160, the best result is 55.2 FPS on Low settings, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium averages 40.6 FPS, High averages 32.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. The database records no playable settings at this resolution.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: The best playable preset is Medium, which delivers an average of 66.2 FPS. Low also clears the threshold at 96.6 FPS, but Medium is the highest quality option that stays above 60 FPS. High averages 54.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 41.8 FPS, both below the playable threshold.

Q: Is 1080p Ultra playable?

A: No, 1920x1080 Ultra averages 59.5 FPS, just 0.5 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset is the best playable option at 78.5 FPS, with Low at 137.1 FPS and Medium at 89.4 FPS all comfortably above the threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct alternative, the Intel Core i7-12700KF?

A: The i7-12700K scores 35287 on average, while the i7-12700KF scores 35365. That is a 0.2% difference, meaning the i7-12700KF is slower by a negligible margin. In Rust, this would translate to less than a 1% FPS difference, which is imperceptible.

Q: What is the GPU performance percentile?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER sits at the 62nd percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning it performs better than about 62% of recorded graphics cards. This places it in the mid-range tier for Rust, as evidenced by its ability to handle 1080p and 1440p with high settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo is recorded at three resolutions and four presets each, with average FPS values only; no minimum or maximum frame times are provided.

At 3840x2160, the results are as follows: Low averages 55.2 FPS, Medium averages 40.6 FPS, High averages 32.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. The gap from Low to Medium is 14.6 FPS, a 26% drop, and from Medium to High is 8.2 FPS, a 20% drop. The Low preset is the only one close to the 60 FPS threshold, but it still misses it by 4.8 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 96.6 FPS on average, Medium delivers 66.2 FPS, High delivers 54.9 FPS, and Ultra delivers 41.8 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is 11.3 FPS, which is a 17% reduction, while the drop from High to Ultra is 13.1 FPS, a 24% reduction. Low is far above the threshold, but Medium is the highest preset that clears 60 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the situation improves significantly. Low averages 137.1 FPS, Medium averages 89.4 FPS, High averages 78.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 59.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 47.7 FPS, a 35% drop, while the gap between Medium and High is 10.9 FPS, a 12% drop. High is 18.5 FPS above the playable threshold, while Ultra is 0.5 FPS below it, making Ultra the only preset that fails at 1080p.

The data indicates that the i7-12700K and RTX 2060 SUPER combo scales predictably with resolution: reducing resolution from 1440p to 1080p yields roughly a 20% to 30% FPS increase at the same preset, while moving from 1080p to 4K halves the frame rate.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the playable territory is limited. According to the database's verdictByResolution, the i7-12700K and RTX 2060 SUPER clear the 60 FPS threshold at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but not at 3840x2160.

At 1080p, the High preset is the best option, averaging 78.5 FPS. Low and Medium also clear the threshold at 137.1 FPS and 89.4 FPS, respectively. Ultra just misses at 59.5 FPS, so the user should stick to High for a consistent experience above 60 FPS.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the best option, averaging 66.2 FPS. Low runs at 96.6 FPS, but High dips to 54.9 FPS and Ultra to 41.8 FPS, so Medium is the only preset that provides a smooth frame rate without sacrificing too much visual quality.

At 4K, no preset clears 60 FPS. The highest average is 55.2 FPS on Low, which is 4.8 FPS short of the threshold. High and Medium are far below at 32.4 FPS and 40.6 FPS, respectively, and Ultra is only 25 FPS. For 4K play, the user would need to lower resolution or accept sub-60 FPS gameplay.

The verdict is clear: the combo is a solid 1080p performer, a capable 1440p machine at medium settings, but not a 4K solution for Rust.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's ranking of all tested CPU and GPU combinations for Rust, this pair ranks 2558 out of 3723 total combos. That places it in the 31st percentile, meaning about 69% of all tested combos perform better and about 31% perform worse. This is a mid-pack result, which aligns with the component positions: the i7-12700K is at the 84th percentile among CPUs, while the RTX 2060 SUPER is at the 62nd percentile among GPUs. The combo's rank is dragged down by the GPU, as the CPU is clearly above average while the GPU is only slightly above the midpoint.

The ranking means that for Rust, many other CPU and GPU pairings will deliver higher frame rates, but this combination is not a bottom-tier setup. It outperforms the majority of lower-end or older hardware, and it is only 1,165 positions away from the top 1,000, which is a substantial gap. Users with this combo should expect a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, but they are nowhere near the top tier of performance for this game.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured FPS data, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is as follows:

At 1920x1080, the best preset is High, with an average FPS of 78.5. This is the highest quality setting that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Low delivers 137.1 FPS and Medium delivers 89.4 FPS, but High is the best visual quality while maintaining playability. Ultra is not recommended because it averages 59.5 FPS, which is below the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best preset is Medium, with an average FPS of 66.2. Low runs at 96.6 FPS, but Medium is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS. High at 54.9 FPS and Ultra at 41.8 FPS are below the threshold, so those should be avoided for a smooth experience.

At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset. The best recorded average is Low at 55.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Since no preset clears 60 FPS, the database lists no best settings for this resolution.

The data suggests that the optimal experience for this combo is 1080p High (78.5 FPS) or 1440p Medium (66.2 FPS). For users prioritizing smoothness, 1080p High provides the best balance of quality and performance. For users with a 1440p monitor, Medium is the only viable option. 4K is not recommended unless the user is willing to accept frame rates in the 40s or lower.