Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 35 | 41 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 45 | 59 | 70 | 104 |
| 1080p Full HD | 65 | 86 | 102 | 151 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination delivers a split personality in Rust, heavily dependent on your chosen resolution and graphics preset. At 1080p, this system is overwhelmingly capable, pushing past 150 FPS on Low and maintaining a smooth 65 FPS at the maximum Ultra preset. However, the experience degrades rapidly as resolution climbs, with 4K Ultra falling to a slideshow-like 27 FPS average. The data indicates a system that is clearly CPU-strong but GPU-limited at higher pixel counts, making it a versatile 1080p and 1440p performer rather than a 4K powerhouse.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rate data for Rust on this configuration shows a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution and settings increase. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fluid across all presets. The Low preset delivers a commanding 151 FPS average, while Medium settles at 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS. High settings produce a still-smooth 86 FPS average, and even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains a playable 65 FPS average. This resolution is clearly the sweet spot for this pairing.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains respectable but begins to show strain. The Low preset achieves a strong 104 FPS average, while Medium drops to 70 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 59 FPS and maximum of 80 FPS. High settings hover right at the edge of playability with a 59 FPS average, which technically falls below the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings at 1440p produce a 45 FPS average, which is noticeably less fluid and would be noticeable in fast-paced combat scenarios.
At 3840x2160, the RX 9060's 8 GB memory buffer and 128-bit bus become significant bottlenecks. The Low preset is the only playable option, yielding a 62 FPS average. Medium settings drop to 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 47 FPS, while High settings manage just 35 FPS. Ultra at 4K is the worst-case scenario, producing a 27 FPS average that is effectively unplayable for any serious gaming session. The data shows a steep cliff between Low and Medium at 4K, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth is the limiting factor.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate that the Intel Core i7-12700K is more than sufficient for Rust at every tested resolution, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its 19,784 score in Cinebench R23 multicore and 34,404 in Passmark multithread, ensures that even at 1080p Low where the GPU is less stressed, the system maintains high frame rates without CPU bottlenecking.
The scaling between resolutions reveals the GPU's dominance in determining performance. From 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 102 to 70, a 31% reduction. From 1440p to 4K at Medium, the average further drops from 70 to 41, a 41% reduction. This consistent degradation pattern points directly at the GPU's rendering capabilities. The RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are simply insufficient for the pixel throughput required at 4K, particularly with higher-detail presets.
The CPU's role becomes more apparent when comparing presets at the same resolution. At 1080p, the jump from Low (151 FPS) to Ultra (65 FPS) represents a 57% performance loss, which is more attributable to GPU workload than CPU limitations. The i7-12700K's 12 cores and 20 threads, along with its 5.00 GHz boost clock, provide ample headroom for Rust's simulation and physics calculations. Even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU is clearly overwhelmed at 27 FPS, the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor given its 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the Intel Core i7-12700K's nearest rivals show minimal performance deltas, meaning users would see nearly identical frame rates in Rust. The Intel Core i5-13600T has an average benchmark score of 35,305, just 0.1% lower than the i7-12700K's 35,287. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35,365, a 0.2% difference, while the Intel Core i7-13700T and Intel Core 5 213PE score 35,403 and 35,428 respectively, both within 0.4% of the i7-12700K. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would produce statistically indistinguishable results in Rust, meaning the choice between them would not meaningfully alter the FPS figures presented here.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 9060's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which has an average score of 16,129, just 0.7% higher than the RX 9060's 16,014. This indicates that the RTX 3060 Ti would deliver essentially the same frame rates in Rust at all tested resolutions. The AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862 average score, 1% lower) and AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15,852 average score, 1% lower) would perform within a single percentage point of the RX 9060. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15,679 average score, 2.1% lower) would be slightly slower but still in the same performance class. For builders considering alternatives, the RTX 3060 Ti is the closest match, offering virtually identical Rust performance.
The Verdict
This PC configuration can run Rust, but the playability depends entirely on your target resolution and desired settings. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Ultra preset averages 65 FPS, which is comfortably above the threshold. At 2560x1440, only Low (104 FPS) and Medium (70 FPS) are playable, while High (59 FPS) narrowly misses the mark. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playability with a 62 FPS average.
For competitive play, the 1080p Low preset at 151 FPS provides an exceptional experience with maximum responsiveness. For visual quality at 1080p, the Ultra preset at 65 FPS is the best balance of fidelity and smoothness. At 1440p, Medium at 70 FPS is the highest quality option that maintains a consistent 60+ FPS experience. At 4K, players must accept the Low preset at 62 FPS, which sacrifices most graphical features for playable performance. The overall combo rank of 2,190 out of 3,723 combinations places this system in the upper half of tested configurations for Rust.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which delivers a 62 FPS average. This is the only playable option at 4K, and it requires significant graphical compromises. The next step up, Medium, drops to 41 FPS, which is far too low for smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, Medium is the best playable setting, achieving a 70 FPS average. This provides a good balance between visual quality and performance. The minimum of 59 FPS suggests occasional dips below the threshold, but the average remains solid. High settings at 1440p fall to 59 FPS average, which is technically below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best option, delivering a 65 FPS average. This allows players to experience the full visual fidelity of Rust without sacrificing smoothness. All lower presets also remain playable, with High at 86 FPS, Medium at 102 FPS, and Low at 151 FPS. The 1080p Ultra setting at 65 FPS represents the best overall balance of quality and performance for this system.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: Yes, but only on the Low preset, which achieves a 62 FPS average. Any higher preset at 3840x2160 falls below the 60 FPS threshold, with Medium at 41 FPS, High at 35 FPS, and Ultra at 27 FPS.
Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 produce a 70 FPS average, making it the most demanding playable option. High settings drop to 59 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti in Rust?
A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16,129, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 9060's 16,014. This means both GPUs would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Rust at all resolutions and settings.
Q: Is the i7-12700K a bottleneck for the RX 9060 in Rust?
A: No. The i7-12700K ranks in the 84th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 35,287. Its nearest rival, the i5-13600T, scores 35,305, showing that the CPU has ample headroom for the GPU's workload in Rust.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 delivers a 65 FPS average, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the highest quality preset that remains fully playable at this resolution.
Q: Why does performance drop so drastically from 1440p Medium to 4K Medium?
A: The average FPS falls from 70 at 1440p Medium to 41 at 4K Medium, a 41% reduction. This is due to the RX 9060's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, which are insufficient for the higher pixel throughput required at 4K.