Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

28%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
137 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
57 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
95 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
40 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
55 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
27 FPS
12.3ms Frame Time
18ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 2,254
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 16,129

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 35 38 55
1440p QHD 40 57 63 95
1080p Full HD 57 81 92 137

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 81
1920x1080 Low 137
1920x1080 Medium 92
1920x1080 Ultra 57
2560x1440 High 57
2560x1440 Low 95
2560x1440 Medium 63
2560x1440 Ultra 40
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Low 55
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 Ultra 27

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a pairing that lands in the middle of the database’s tested combinations, ranked 2580 out of 3723 total combos for Rust. The data shows a clear pattern: this system can handle the game comfortably at 1080p with high visual quality, and remains playable at 1440p if the settings are dialed back. 4K is not a realistic target for this pairing, as even the lowest preset falls short of the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded FPS data for this combination covers three resolutions and four quality presets, with only average frame rates listed. At 1920x1080, the performance is strong across most settings. The Low preset delivers an average of 137.2 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that would fully utilize a high refresh rate monitor. Medium settings drop the average to 91.7 FPS, and High still maintains a solid 81.2 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only one at this resolution that falls below the playable threshold, averaging 56.7 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are notably lower, but the system remains playable on two of the four presets. Low settings produce an average of 94.7 FPS, which is still a very good experience. Medium settings deliver an average of 63.1 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings drop to 56.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to a 40 FPS average, making both presets unsuitable for smooth play.

The 3840x2160 data is the most demanding scenario. At this resolution, the average frame rate on any preset is below the playable threshold. Low settings achieve a 54.6 FPS average, which is close but not enough to be considered playable. Medium drops to 37.9 FPS, High goes down to 34.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at a 26.5 FPS average.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU in this pairing both sit within a narrow band of their respective nearest rivals, according to the database’s average benchmark scores. The Intel Core i5-9400 has an average benchmark score of 2254. Its closest rivals are the Intel Core i7-1068NG7 with a score of 2259, which is 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core i7-10710U with a score of 2248, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 scores 2246, 0.4% slower, and the Intel Core i3-10305 scores 2264, 0.4% faster. These deltas are minimal, meaning the CPU performance in this system is on par with those other processors.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16129. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 with a score of 16014, which is 0.7% slower. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351, which is 1.4% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, also 1.4% faster. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862, which is 1.7% slower. the RTX 3060 Ti is a performance match for the RX 5700 XT, with the difference between their scores being statistically insignificant.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database’s verdict data defines the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution. At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is High, which produces an average of 81.2 FPS. This leaves headroom above the threshold, so the system could run the Medium preset at 91.7 FPS, but High is the most demanding option that still clears the line.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, with an average of 63.1 FPS. This is a close call, as the frame rate is just above the required minimum. The High preset falls short at 56.5 FPS, so it is not a viable option for a smooth experience.

For 3840x2160, there is no playable setting. All four presets, Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, result in average frame rates below 60 FPS. The highest average, 54.6 FPS, occurs at the Low preset, but it still does not reach the threshold.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K resolution?

A: No. According to the recorded data, none of the tested presets at 3840x2160 achieve an average frame rate of 60 FPS or higher. The best result at Low settings is 54.6 FPS, the lowest tested preset.

Q: What is the highest graphical preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, with an average of 63.1 FPS. The High preset is below the threshold, averaging 56.5 FPS.

Q: What average FPS can I expect at 1080p on High settings?

A: The recorded data shows an average of 81.2 FPS for the High preset at 1920x1080. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Which settings are playable at 1080p?

A: The playable settings at 1920x1080 are High (81.2 FPS), Medium (91.7 FPS), and Low (137.2 FPS). The Ultra preset is not playable, with an average of 56.7 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 3060 Ti compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16129. The RX 5700 XT has an average score of 16361, which is 1.4% higher. The performance difference is negligible in most real-world scenarios.

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in the database?

A: This combination is ranked 2580 out of 3723 tested combinations for Rust. This puts it in the lower-middle portion of the database rankings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a distinct shift in system behavior as the resolution changes, which indicates the balance between the CPU and GPU loads. At 1920x1080, the performance is primarily limited by the CPU. This is evident when looking at the frame rate scaling between the Low and High presets. The frame rate drops from 137.2 FPS to 81.2 FPS, a reduction of 40%. This is a typical sign of a CPU bottleneck, where the graphics card has enough power to render the frames, but the CPU is the limiting factor for how many frames it can prepare.

When the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take a more significant role. The frame rate at the Low preset drops from 137.2 FPS to 94.7 FPS, which is a 31% decrease. This is a bigger drop than the one from High to Ultra at 1080p. This trend continues at 3840x2160, where even the Low preset is limited to 54.6 FPS. The frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is also smaller in relative terms, going from 54.6 FPS to 26.5 FPS, a 51% drop. At lower resolutions, the CPU is the main bottleneck, but at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the dominant factor.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this Intel Core i5-9400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti as the 2580th best combination out of 3723 tested combos for this game. This places the system just above the 30th percentile, meaning there are more than 1000 tested combos that perform better. This is a mid-range result that reflects the mix of an older 6-core CPU and a newer mid-range GPU. The ranking indicates that while this system can achieve 60 FPS at certain settings, it is not a high-end, top-tier configuration for Rust.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the quality of the experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with the High preset yielding 81.2 FPS, which is well above the threshold. Even the High preset is stable, and the Low preset provides a much higher frame rate for competitive play.

At 2560x1440, the system is still playable, but the settings must be lowered. The Medium preset is the only option that clears the 60 FPS line, with an average of 63.1 FPS. This is a playable experience, but there is little room to spare.

At 3840x2160, the system cannot reach the 60 FPS threshold at any settings. The best case is the Low preset at 54.6 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. The final takeaway is clear: 1080p is the sweet spot for this combination, 1440p is possible with the right settings, and 4K is not an option.