Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 80 | 95 | 141 |
| 1440p QHD | 103 | 136 | 161 | 220 |
| 1080p Full HD | 150 | 197 | 215 | 250 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Rust, with the data showing that even the most demanding Ultra preset remains comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution. Across 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080, this combination never dips below 61 FPS on average, making it a top-tier performer for this survival title.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is Ultra, with a measured average of 61 FPS. This is the ceiling for this resolution; pushing beyond Ultra is not possible within the game's settings, and the data confirms that the combo holds the threshold with just a single frame of headroom. For players prioritizing maximum visual fidelity at 4K, Ultra is the only acceptable choice, though the margin is slim.
Moving to 2560x1440, the best settings are again Ultra, delivering an average of 103 FPS. This represents a substantial jump from the 4K result — over 68% higher — indicating that the GPU workload at 1440p is significantly lighter. The 103 FPS average provides ample room above the 60 FPS floor, so users can enable every graphical feature without concern for playability.
At 1920x1080, Ultra remains the best setting, with an average of 150 FPS. This is more than double the 4K Ultra average and nearly 2.5 times the playable threshold. The data shows a clear progression: as resolution drops, the headroom above 60 FPS expands dramatically, from just 1 FPS at 4K to 90 FPS at 1080p. For competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, the 1080p Ultra preset is the definitive choice, though even the Low preset at 250 FPS suggests the CPU becomes the limiting factor at this resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results reveal a shifting balance between CPU and GPU influence depending on resolution. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant constraint. The scaling from Medium (95 FPS) to Ultra (61 FPS) shows a 36% performance drop with increased settings, while the jump from Low (141 FPS) to Medium (95 FPS) represents a 33% reduction. These steep declines indicate that the RTX 5090 D's rendering workload is the primary bottleneck at 4K, as the i5-14600KF's 14 cores and 20 threads have ample capacity to feed the GPU.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The difference between Low (220 FPS) and Medium (161 FPS) is 27%, and between Medium and High (136 FPS) is 15%, but the gap from High to Ultra (103 FPS) is 24%. This nonlinear pattern suggests that both components are actively engaged: the GPU still handles the increased pixel count, but the CPU's single-thread performance, boosted by a 5.30 GHz clock, becomes more relevant as frame rates rise above 150 FPS. The 220 FPS Low result approaches the practical ceiling for this CPU in Rust, indicating CPU-side limits begin to emerge.
At 1920x1080, the CPU takes a leading role. The Low preset reaches 250 FPS, which is likely near the game engine's or CPU's maximum throughput. The scaling from Low to Medium (215 FPS) is a 14% drop, Medium to High (197 FPS) is 8%, and High to Ultra (150 FPS) is 24%. The relatively small penalties at lower settings, combined with the sheer 250 FPS peak, show that the i5-14600KF's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594) is the key driver. The GPU, while still powerful, is not the limiting factor at 1080p; the CPU's ability to process game logic and draw calls dictates the upper bound.
Measured FPS Breakdown
3840x2160:
- Low: average 141 FPS
- Medium: average 95 FPS, minimum 81 FPS, maximum 109 FPS
- High: average 80 FPS
- Ultra: average 61 FPS
The 4K data shows a consistent downward trend with each settings tier. The Medium preset's minimum of 81 FPS confirms that even during demanding scenes, the combo stays well above 60 FPS. The 80 FPS High average and 61 FPS Ultra average indicate that Ultra is the first setting where the system approaches the playable limit, but it does not cross it.
2560x1440:
- Low: average 220 FPS
- Medium: average 161 FPS, minimum 136 FPS, maximum 185 FPS
- High: average 136 FPS
- Ultra: average 103 FPS
At 1440p, the Medium preset's minimum of 136 FPS is higher than the 4K Ultra average, illustrating the resolution's impact. The spread from Low to Ultra is 117 FPS, showing that settings choices can halve or double performance. The Ultra average of 103 FPS provides a comfortable margin for 60 Hz displays and even some 100 Hz panels.
1920x1080:
- Low: average 250 FPS
- Medium: average 215 FPS, minimum 182 FPS, maximum 247 FPS
- High: average 197 FPS
- Ultra: average 150 FPS
The 1080p results are the strongest overall. The Low preset's 250 FPS average is the highest measured value across all resolutions and settings. The Medium preset's maximum of 247 FPS nearly matches the Low average, suggesting that the Medium-to-Low gap is minimal in practice. Even Ultra at 150 FPS is more than double the playable threshold, making this resolution the most versatile for users who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity.
How This Combo Ranks
In the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 25th out of 3,723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the top 0.7% of all configurations. This percentile positioning reflects the hardware's strength: the i5-14600KF sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 5090 D achieves the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. The combo's rank is slightly lower than either component's individual percentile, which is expected given that Rust's engine can bottleneck on CPU at high frame rates and on GPU at 4K Ultra.
The rank of 25 out of 3,723 indicates that only 24 other combinations produce higher average FPS in this game. These would likely include newer flagship CPUs paired with the same or higher-tier GPUs, but the data does not specify which combos outrank it. The measured FPS values show that this pairing excels at 1440p and 1080p, where the CPU's strong single-thread score (4594 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and the GPU's massive 32 GB GDDR7 memory buffer work in concert.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For users considering nearby hardware, the nearest rivals to the i5-14600KF offer comparable CPU performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has an average benchmark score of 49228, just 0.3% lower than the i5's 49394. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, 0.4% lower) and Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995, 0.8% lower) are also close matches. On the higher side, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, which is 0.8% above the i5. In Rust, these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates, with differences of less than 1% translating to at most 2-3 FPS at 1080p Ultra.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5090 D has an average benchmark score of 77712, with the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (76904, 1.1% lower) being the closest lower performer and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78940, 1.6% higher) the closest higher performer. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79396, 2.1% higher) and 16 GB (79605, 2.4% higher) also rank nearby. However, these rivals are mobile or workstation parts; for desktop gaming, the deltas suggest that swapping to an RX 6850M XT would yield roughly 1-2 FPS more at 4K Ultra, while an RX 6650M XT would cost about 1 FPS. None of these alternatives would fundamentally change the playability verdict at any resolution.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Rust at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 61 FPS, which meets the 60 FPS playable threshold. However, the margin is only 1 FPS, so users should expect occasional dips below 60 in heavy scenes, though the data does not record a minimum for Ultra at this resolution.
Q: What is the highest FPS this combo can achieve in Rust?
A: The maximum measured average is 250 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The Medium preset at 1080p reaches a maximum of 247 FPS, indicating that the game engine or CPU limits around this range.
Q: How does this combo rank against other tested systems?
A: It ranks 25th out of 3,723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the top 1% of all configurations. This is consistent with the CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 92nd percentile rankings among all hardware.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Rust at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the balance is nearly even. The Low preset hits 220 FPS, suggesting CPU limits begin above 200 FPS, while the drop to Ultra at 103 FPS shows the GPU still carries significant load. The 117 FPS spread between Low and Ultra indicates both components influence performance.
Q: What settings should I use for a 60 Hz 4K monitor?
A: Ultra at 3840x2160 averages 61 FPS, which is just above 60. If you want more headroom, High averages 80 FPS and Medium averages 95 FPS, both providing safer margins above the playable threshold.
Q: Are there nearby GPUs that perform similarly?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 1.6% higher than the RTX 5090 D, while the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT scores 1.1% lower. These differences would translate to roughly 1-2 FPS in Rust at 4K Ultra, which is negligible for playability.