Rust

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers a wide range of performance in Rust, depending on resolution and preset. At 1080p, the system is exceptionally strong, while at 4K it requires careful settings management to maintain smooth gameplay. The data shows a clear progression: higher resolutions and higher presets increase the load on the GPU, but the CPU remains a solid foundation throughout.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU each sit near specific rivals in benchmark scores, meaning users upgrading from or considering these parts should expect similar frame rates in Rust.

For the Intel Core i5-14600KF, the nearest performance neighbor is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which scores only 0.3% higher on average. This places the i5-14600KF in a tight cluster of processors where the difference is negligible in real-world gaming. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.4% ahead, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 trails by 0.8%. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is 0.8% faster. In practical terms, all four rivals will produce nearly identical CPU-bound frame rates in Rust, though the i5-14600KF’s 14 cores and 20 threads give it a slight edge in heavily populated servers where draw calls multiply.

The RTX 4070 SUPER’s rivals are slightly more spread out. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB is 0.1% ahead, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile matches within 0.1%. The Quadro M6000 (non-24GB version) is 0.2% ahead, and the RTX 4090 Mobile leads by 1%. This means that in GPU-bound scenarios—such as 4K Ultra presets—the RTX 4070 SUPER will perform within a narrow band of these alternatives, with the RTX 4090 Mobile potentially delivering a few more frames per second. However, the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 56 RT cores make it better suited for Rust’s long draw distances and dynamic lighting than the older Quadro parts.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how the CPU and GPU share responsibility across resolutions and presets in Rust.

At 1920x1080, the CPU is the primary driver. The RTX 4070 SUPER is powerful enough that even at Ultra settings, the average FPS of 106.3 is well above the 60 FPS threshold. Dropping to Low at this resolution yields 249.8 FPS, which indicates that the GPU is far from maxed out. The scaling from Low to Ultra (a drop of 143.5 FPS) shows that the GPU handles the extra graphical load without bottlenecking, but the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads ensure that the game’s simulation and physics stay fluid.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU. The Ultra preset delivers 76.6 FPS, while Low hits 169.6 FPS. The delta between presets is smaller than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is starting to become a limiting factor at higher settings. Still, the CPU remains sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution, as evidenced by the 76.6 FPS at Ultra, which is 16.6 FPS above the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the GPU dominates the performance equation. The Ultra preset drops to 42.9 FPS, which is 17.1 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold, while Medium stays playable at 66.5 FPS. The gap between Low (99.3 FPS) and Ultra (42.9 FPS) is 56.4 FPS, demonstrating that the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are stretched at 4K with maximum settings. The CPU’s role diminishes here, as the GPU is clearly the bottleneck; upgrading the processor would yield minimal gains at this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides exact average FPS figures for each resolution and settings combination. Minimum and maximum FPS are not available, so the analysis relies on averages.

At 1920x1080, the i5-14600KF and RTX 4070 SUPER excel across all four presets. Low settings produce 249.8 FPS, which is the highest recorded in the entire dataset. Medium lowers this to 166.5 FPS, a drop of 83.3 FPS. High settings deliver 143.9 FPS, which is 22.6 FPS below Medium. Ultra settings bring the average down to 106.3 FPS, still 46.3 FPS above the playable threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 143.5 FPS reduction, indicating that Rust’s graphical options have a substantial impact on performance.

At 2560x1440, the numbers are lower but still comfortable. Low settings average 169.6 FPS, which is 80.2 FPS less than at 1080p Low. Medium produces 113.3 FPS, a 53.2 FPS reduction from Low. High settings hit 96.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 76.6 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 93 FPS, showing that the GPU’s workload scales significantly with preset quality.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4070 SUPER faces its toughest challenge. Low settings yield 99.3 FPS, which is the only preset above 100 FPS at this resolution. Medium drops to 66.5 FPS, a 32.8 FPS reduction. High settings fall to 55.6 FPS, which is 4.4 FPS below the playable threshold. Ultra settings bottom out at 42.9 FPS, a 56.4 FPS drop from Low. The gap between Medium and Ultra is 23.6 FPS, suggesting that the highest preset imposes a heavy shading and texture load on the 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 106.3, which is 46.3 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best preset this system can handle at 3840x2160?

A: Medium is the best playable setting at 4K, with an average of 66.5 FPS. High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS (55.6 and 42.9 FPS respectively).

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to its nearest GPU rival in Rust?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 0.1% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and 1% lower than the RTX 4090 Mobile. In practice, this translates to a few frames per second difference in GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: Is the i5-14600KF a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 SUPER at 2560x1440?

A: No. At 1440p Ultra, the system achieves 76.6 FPS, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU adequately. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, scores only 0.3% higher on average.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1920x1080?

A: Low settings deliver 249.8 FPS, while Ultra delivers 106.3 FPS, a difference of 143.5 FPS. This shows that preset quality has a major impact on performance.

Q: Does the system meet the 60 FPS threshold at 4K High settings?

A: No. The average FPS at 3840x2160 High is 55.6, which is 4.4 FPS below the playable threshold. Users must drop to Medium to stay above 60 FPS.

The Verdict

The verdict data clearly answers whether this PC can run Rust: it depends on the resolution and preset.

At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable. The lowest average FPS is 106.3 at Ultra, which is 46.3 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most comfortable configuration for the system, offering headroom for demanding scenes such as large bases or heavy firefights.

At 2560x1440, the system also passes every preset. Ultra settings average 76.6 FPS, which is 16.6 FPS above the threshold. Low settings reach 169.6 FPS, and Medium hits 113.3 FPS. This resolution is a sweet spot for the RTX 4070 SUPER, providing high visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

At 3840x2160, the system is only partially playable. Low (99.3 FPS) and Medium (66.5 FPS) clear the 60 FPS threshold, but High (55.6 FPS) and Ultra (42.9 FPS) do not. Users targeting 4K must accept Medium settings or lower to maintain a stable frame rate. The data indicates that the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for Medium but not for the higher presets.

Overall, this PC is a strong performer for Rust at 1080p and 1440p, and a capable but limited option at 4K. The i5-14600KF’s 90th percentile CPU ranking and the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 83rd percentile GPU ranking align with the measured results, confirming that the system is well-balanced for most gaming scenarios.

Best Settings per Resolution

The following recommendations identify the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best setting. The measured average FPS is 106.3, which is 46.3 FPS above the threshold. This allows users to enable all graphical features while retaining a smooth experience.

At 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best setting. The average FPS is 76.6, which is 16.6 FPS above the threshold. While this is lower than at 1080p, it still provides a comfortable margin for most gameplay.

At 3840x2160, Medium is the best setting. The average FPS is 66.5, which is 6.5 FPS above the threshold. High settings at 55.6 FPS are not recommended, as they fall below the playable threshold. Users should stick to Medium for 4K, reserving Low (99.3 FPS) for scenarios requiring extra headroom.

These settings are based solely on average FPS data; minimum and maximum FPS were not recorded, so individual frames may vary. The system’s performance in Rust is solid overall, with the 1080p and 1440p experiences being particularly strong.