Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 13 | 18 | 21 | 31 |
| 1440p QHD | 23 | 30 | 35 | 53 |
| 1080p Full HD | 33 | 43 | 51 | 76 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc B390 combination presents a stark contrast in capability. The CPU is a high-end desktop part, while the GPU is an integrated graphics solution designed for portable devices. In Rust, this pairing produces a heavily GPU-limited experience, with the recorded data showing playable performance only at the lowest settings and resolution.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the database's nearest rival comparisons, the Intel Core i5-14600KF sits in a tightly contested performance tier. Its average benchmark score of 49394 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which scores 49228, a difference of only 0.3%. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, 0.4% delta) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995, 0.8% delta) are also effectively neck-and-neck in synthetic testing. The only rival that edges slightly ahead is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 with a score of 49796, outperforming the i5-14600KF by 0.8%. For CPU-bound tasks, swapping between these processors would yield imperceptible differences in Rust.
The GPU side is where the performance picture becomes restrictive. The Intel Arc B390's average benchmark score of 1482 places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms only a small fraction of the hardware in the database. Its nearest rivals are all legacy NVIDIA parts: the GeForce GT 520MX (1463, 1.3% delta), GeForce 800M (1460, 1.5% delta), GeForce GT 625 OEM (1446, 2.5% delta), and GeForce GT 710 (1443, 2.7% delta). The data indicates that the Arc B390 performs within a 2.7% margin of these older, entry-level graphics solutions. Users migrating from any of these GPUs would experience nearly identical frame rates in Rust, regardless of the change in architecture.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results in Rust make the division of labor between the Intel Core i5-14600KF and the Intel Arc B390 unmistakably clear. At every resolution and across all settings, the frame rates are constrained by the GPU's rendering capabilities, not the CPU's processing power. The i5-14600KF, with its 14 cores and 20 threads and a benchmark score in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, is more than sufficient for the game's simulation and world-tick logic. The bottleneck lies entirely with the Arc B390.
The scaling between resolutions and presets confirms this. At 1920x1080, the average frame rate drops from 76 FPS on Low settings to 43 FPS on High, a reduction of 33 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same settings transition yields a drop from 53 FPS to 30 FPS. This steep decline is a classic symptom of a GPU operating at its limits; as the pixel count and shading complexity increase, the integrated graphics unit falls further behind. The CPU's role becomes less relevant at higher resolutions because the GPU is saturated with render work long before it can wait on the processor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data provides a complete picture of the system's performance across three resolutions and four quality presets.
At 3840x2160, the Arc B390 is overwhelmed. The Low preset averages 31 FPS, which is the best result at this resolution. Medium settings average 21 FPS, with recorded minimums of 18 FPS and maximums of 24 FPS. High settings drop to 18 FPS, and Ultra is nearly unplayable at 13 FPS. None of these figures approach the 60 FPS playable threshold, and even the minimum frame rates are consistently below 30 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the situation improves but remains well below playable standards. The Low preset averages 53 FPS, which is the only setting that comes close to a smooth experience, though it still misses the 60 FPS target. Medium averages 35 FPS, with a minimum of 30 FPS and a maximum of 41 FPS. High settings average 30 FPS, and Ultra averages 23 FPS. The data indicates that 1440p is not a viable resolution for this combo in Rust, regardless of the visual fidelity selected.
At 1920x1080, the system finally achieves a playable result. The Low preset averages 76 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with a comfortable margin. Medium settings average 51 FPS, with a minimum of 44 FPS and a maximum of 59 FPS, indicating that the system cannot sustain a consistent 60 FPS at this preset. High settings average 43 FPS, and Ultra averages 33 FPS. The recorded minimum and maximum values for Medium show a narrow band, suggesting the frame rate is stable but capped by the GPU's limits.
The Verdict
The question of whether this PC can run Rust has a conditional answer. Based on the verdictByResolution data, the system is only playable at 1920x1080 with the Low preset, where it achieves an average of 76 FPS. This is the sole configuration that meets the 60 FPS playable threshold defined by the database.
At 2560x1440, the verdict is clear: no settings are playable. The best-case average is 53 FPS on Low, which falls short of 60 FPS. The same applies to 3840x2160, where even the lowest settings only produce 31 FPS. The data suggests that users must accept a significant compromise in resolution and visual quality to play Rust. The combination of a powerful CPU and a weak integrated GPU means the experience is entirely dictated by the graphics solution. For anyone seeking higher settings or resolutions, this specific combo would not be recommended based on the measurements alone.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database's collection of tested hardware combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc B390 ranks 3312 out of 3723 combos for Rust. This places it in the bottom 11% of all recorded configurations. The rank reflects the severe limitation imposed by the GPU. While the CPU is in the top 10% of all processors, the GPU's 9th percentile standing drags the overall combination down significantly. The data indicates that the majority of other tested combos in the database deliver higher frame rates in Rust, even if their CPUs are less capable. This rank serves as a warning that the CPU's strength does little to compensate for the GPU's weakness in this particular title.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 60 FPS?
A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset, where the average frame rate is 76 FPS. All other tested settings and resolutions fall below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best playable settings preset for this combo?
A: The database lists only 1920x1080 with Low settings as playable, achieving an average of 76 FPS. The best settings preset is therefore Low at that resolution.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its closest rivals?
A: The Arc B390's average benchmark score is 1482. It is within 2.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443), GeForce GT 625 OEM (1446), GeForce 800M (1460), and GeForce GT 520MX (1463) in the database's measurements.
Q: Is the Intel Core i5-14600KF a strong processor for gaming?
A: The processor scores in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, scores 49228, a difference of only 0.3%. The CPU is not the limiting factor in this system.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1440p with Medium settings?
A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average frame rate is 35 FPS, with minimums of 30 FPS and maximums of 41 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested systems in Rust?
A: This combination of the Intel Core i5-14600KF and Intel Arc B390 ranks 3312 out of 3723 tested combos for the game, placing it near the bottom of the database's results.