Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

70%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
75 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
31 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
24 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
32 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
11 FPS
24.4ms Frame Time
37ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 12,928

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 11 15 23 32
1440p QHD 24 29 32 54
1080p Full HD 31 41 48 75

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 41
1920x1080 Low 75
1920x1080 Medium 48
1920x1080 Ultra 31
2560x1440 High 29
2560x1440 Low 54
2560x1440 Medium 32
2560x1440 Ultra 24
3840x2160 High 15
3840x2160 Low 32
3840x2160 Medium 23
3840x2160 Ultra 11

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 580 is a combination that places the CPU in the top 10% of all processors, while the GPU sits near the middle of the pack. This pairing creates a significant imbalance where the processor's capabilities far outstrip the graphics card's output, and the measured frame rates in Rust reflect that bottleneck.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU first, the Intel Core i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49,394, which places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals in the database show just how tight the competition is at this level. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49,228, which is only 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is nearly identical with a score of 49,196, trailing by just 0.4%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48,995, a 0.8% deficit. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49,796, which is 0.8% ahead of the i5-14600KF. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical performance in Rust, meaning the choice between them would not meaningfully change frame rates.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 580 has an average benchmark score of 12,928, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile scores 12,940, just 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,986, a 0.4% advantage. The AMD Radeon 740M scores 12,870, which is 0.5% lower, and the AMD FirePro W5100 scores 12,847, a 0.6% deficit. The data indicates that swapping the RX 580 for any of these alternatives would result in virtually identical performance in Rust, with differences well within the margin of measurement error.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's testing of Rust, this specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 3,395 out of 3,723 tested combos. That places the combo in roughly the 9th percentile of all systems tested, meaning it performs worse than approximately 91% of the combinations in the database. This low ranking makes sense given the measured frame rates, which struggle to reach playable levels at most settings. The combo's position reflects the GPU's age and mid-range positioning rather than the CPU's strength, as the i5-14600KF is a high-end processor from the Core 14th Gen series with 14 cores and 20 threads. The RX 580, by contrast, was released in 2017 and is now marked as end-of-life, with its GCN 4.0 architecture and 8 GB of GDDR5 memory representing an older generation of graphics technology.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data shows a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution and settings increase. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the system achieves 74.6 FPS on Low settings, which is the only configuration across all resolutions that clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. Moving to Medium settings at 1080p drops the average to 48.2 FPS, a 35% reduction. High settings yield 41.2 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 30.7 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops further. Low settings produce 53.7 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings average 32.4 FPS, High settings average 28.5 FPS, and Ultra settings manage only 24.2 FPS. The step from 1080p Low to 1440p Low represents a 28% performance loss, showing that the resolution increase has a substantial impact.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles across the board. Low settings average 32 FPS, Medium settings drop to 22.7 FPS, High settings fall to 14.9 FPS, and Ultra settings produce just 11.4 FPS. These numbers are all far below the 60 FPS threshold, with even the lowest preset failing to reach half of the target frame rate. The scaling from 1440p Low to 4K Low shows a 40% drop, indicating that the RX 580's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and its 6.175 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are insufficient for the pixel workload at 4K.

The Verdict

This PC cannot run Rust at a playable 60 FPS in most configurations. The verdict data is unambiguous: at 3840x2160, there are no playable settings, meaning no preset achieves an average of 60 FPS or higher. The same is true at 2560x1440, where even the lowest settings fall short. The only playable configuration is at 1920x1080 with Low settings, which achieves 74.6 FPS. This is the sole resolution and preset combination that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Users with this hardware should target 1080p and accept Low settings as the only viable option for smooth gameplay. Any attempt to raise the resolution or increase the graphical preset will result in frame rates below the playability threshold, with most configurations landing well under 50 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows that for this game, the GPU is the limiting factor at every resolution. The CPU, the Intel Core i5-14600KF, is a top-tier processor with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,544 and a single-core score of 4,594. It has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, making it more than capable of feeding any GPU. The RX 580, however, has a Passmark G3D score of 8,813 and a Passmark DirectX 11 score of 60, indicating its age and limited capabilities. The scaling between resolutions confirms this: when moving from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings, the frame rate drops from 74.6 to 53.7 FPS, a 28% reduction. From 1440p to 4K at Low settings, the drop is from 53.7 to 32 FPS, another 40% reduction. These large drops as resolution increases are characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the graphics card cannot keep up with the increasing pixel count. The CPU's performance is essentially unchanged across these tests, as it is not the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 74.6 FPS, which is close to what a high-end CPU can deliver with a mid-range GPU, but the GPU's limitations are exposed as soon as settings or resolution increase. The data suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield significant improvements, while the CPU has headroom to support a much faster graphics card without becoming a limiting factor.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database records only one configuration that achieves a playable frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 74.6 FPS, which is the best and only playable setting at this resolution. The Medium preset at 1080p averages 48.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, no settings are playable, with the Low preset peaking at 53.7 FPS, which is close to but still below 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the best result is 32 FPS on Low settings, which is far from playable. The verdict data confirms this, listing 1920x1080 with Low settings as the only playable configuration, with an average FPS of 74.6. For users who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, this is the only option. Those who require higher settings or resolutions would need to consider a different GPU, as the RX 580 cannot reach 60 FPS at any other tested configuration.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on 1080p?

A: Yes, but only on Low settings. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings is 74.6, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings drop to 48.2 FPS, which is below 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: There is no playable setting at 2560x1440. The Low preset achieves 53.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall further, with averages of 32.4, 28.5, and 24.2 FPS respectively.

Q: How does the RX 580 compare to its nearest rivals in benchmarks?

A: The RX 580 has an average benchmark score of 12,928. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile scores 12,940, which is 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,986, a 0.4% advantage. The AMD Radeon 740M and AMD FirePro W5100 score 12,870 and 12,847, which are 0.5% and 0.6% lower respectively.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system for Rust?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck at all resolutions. The i5-14600KF ranks in the 90th percentile of CPUs, while the RX 580 ranks in the 53rd percentile of GPUs. Frame rates drop by 28% from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings, and by another 40% from 1440p to 4K, indicating the GPU cannot handle the resolution scaling.

Q: What is the highest FPS recorded at 4K?

A: The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 32, achieved on Low settings. Medium settings average 22.7 FPS, High settings average 14.9 FPS, and Ultra settings average 11.4 FPS. None of these are close to 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Rust?

A: The combo ranks 3,395 out of 3,723 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 9% of systems. This low ranking is primarily due to the GPU's limited performance, as the CPU is a high-end part that would not limit frame rates in this game.