Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 66 | 79 | 117 |
| 1440p QHD | 85 | 112 | 133 | 198 |
| 1080p Full HD | 124 | 163 | 193 | 250 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a high-performance benchmark configuration for Rust, a survival title that scales significantly with both CPU and GPU resources depending on resolution. Measured data shows this combo produces triple-digit frame rates at mainstream resolutions, with 4K Ultra being the only tested setting that dips below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Across 12 tested configurations (three resolutions × four quality presets), the average frame rates range from a low of 50 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra to a high of 250 FPS at 1920x1080 Low, indicating substantial headroom for most gaming scenarios.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the i5-14600K and RTX 4080 combination exhibits exceptional performance across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 250 FPS, while Medium delivers 193 FPS with a recorded minimum of 164 FPS and maximum of 222 FPS. High settings produce 163 FPS average, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains a strong 124 FPS average. This resolution shows the least variance between presets in relative terms, suggesting the CPU is keeping pace with the GPU's output at lower pixel counts.
Moving to 2560x1440, frame rates remain highly playable but begin to show the GPU's workload increasing. Low settings yield 198 FPS average, Medium drops to 133 FPS with a minimum of 113 FPS and maximum of 153 FPS, and High produces 112 FPS average. Ultra at 1440p still delivers a robust 85 FPS average, demonstrating that this configuration can handle maximum quality at this resolution without compromising smoothness.
At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low settings still produce a highly respectable 117 FPS average. Medium settings drop to 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS and maximum of 90 FPS, narrowly clearing the 60 FPS threshold even in worst-case scenarios. High settings average 66 FPS, which is marginally above the playability threshold but with no recorded minimum data to confirm consistency. Ultra at 4K falls to 50 FPS average, making it the only configuration in the dataset that fails to maintain 60 FPS on average.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 124 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the playability threshold, allowing users to enable all visual features without concern for frame rate stability.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings also qualify as the best preset, delivering an average of 85 FPS. The 25 FPS drop from the 1080p Ultra result shows the expected cost of higher resolution, but the configuration retains enough performance headroom to keep the experience fluid.
For 3840x2160, the best playable preset is High, which averages 66 FPS. While this clears the 60 FPS threshold, the margin is slim compared to lower resolutions. Medium at 79 FPS average provides more safety margin, but High represents the highest quality that stays playable according to the dataset. Ultra at 50 FPS does not meet the playability criterion.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals how workload distribution shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low (250 FPS) and Ultra (124 FPS) represents a 50.4% reduction in frame rate, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor even at this resolution, as the CPU has more than enough capacity to feed the RTX 4080.
At 2560x1440, the Low-to-Ultra spread narrows to 57.1% (from 198 FPS to 85 FPS), showing that GPU load increases more rapidly than CPU load as pixel count rises. The 1440p results sit between the 1080p and 4K extremes, with the CPU still providing sufficient single-thread performance to avoid bottlenecking the GPU.
At 3840x2160, the Low-to-Ultra drop is 57.3% (from 117 FPS to 50 FPS), which is nearly identical in percentage terms to the 1440p scaling. The absolute frame rates at 4K are roughly 40-60% lower than their 1440p counterparts across presets, confirming that the RTX 4080's pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint. The i5-14600K's 14 cores and 20 threads, with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, provide ample single-thread performance for Rust's simulation and physics workloads, as evidenced by the high frame rates at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more likely to surface.
The fact that 4K Ultra drops to 50 FPS while 4K High stays at 66 FPS suggests that the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient, but the shading and texture workload at Ultra quality exceeds what the RTX 4080 can sustain at that resolution.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-14600K's nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark scores include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H with an average score of 48698 (a -0.2% delta), the AMD EPYC 4345P at 48470 (+0.3%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX at 48287 (+0.7%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 48995 (-0.8%). These processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust, with differences well within run-to-run variance. The Xeon and EPYC parts are server-oriented but would behave similarly in gaming workloads that depend on single-thread performance.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER with an average score of 54209 (+0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54828 (-1.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55698 (-2.6%), and the AMD Radeon 8060S at 55757 (-2.7%). The RTX 4080 SUPER is virtually identical in performance, making it a direct substitute. The Radeon options, despite having higher aggregate scores, may exhibit different frame pacing characteristics in Rust, but the benchmark deltas suggest overall throughput is comparable.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this i5-14600K + RTX 4080 configuration ranks 218th out of 3723 total combos, placing it in the top 5.9% of all tested systems. This percentile position is consistent with the measured frame rates: the combo outperforms the vast majority of configurations while trailing a small group of higher-end pairings, likely those with RTX 4090-class GPUs or newer flagship CPUs. The rank reflects balanced performance across resolutions, with the 4K Ultra result being the only weak point relative to top-tier systems.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average frame rate is 50 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The best playable 4K preset is High at 66 FPS average.
Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains above 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 deliver an average of 85 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution.
Q: How much performance headroom does this combo have at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, even Ultra settings produce 124 FPS average, which is more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold. Lower presets reach up to 250 FPS on Low.
Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more in Rust?
A: The GPU becomes the primary limiter at higher resolutions, as shown by the 4K results where Ultra drops to 50 FPS. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance keeps frame rates high, but the GPU still constrains the top end.
Q: How does this combo compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER variant?
A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080's 54247. This negligible difference means in-game performance would be effectively identical.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded for this configuration?
A: The lowest recorded minimum is 67 FPS at 3840x2160 Medium settings. Other presets have null minimum values in the dataset, so 67 FPS is the only confirmed minimum across all tested configurations.
The Verdict
This configuration can run Rust playably at all tested resolutions, with the sole exception of 4K Ultra. At 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 124 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with Ultra at 85 FPS providing maximum quality well above the playable mark. For 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low (117 FPS), Medium (79 FPS), and High (66 FPS), while Ultra at 50 FPS does not meet the criterion. The data confirms this is a high-end pairing suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and capable of smooth 4K gameplay at High settings. The combo's 218th overall rank out of 3723 tested systems reinforces its position as a top-tier configuration, with only a small set of more powerful hardware producing better results in Rust.