Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 54 | 64 | 93 |
| 1440p QHD | 68 | 87 | 106 | 157 |
| 1080p Full HD | 98 | 128 | 149 | 228 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a robust Rust experience across all common resolutions, though the demands of 4K Ultra settings will test this combination's limits. Benchmark data shows this pairing is capable of high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires a careful selection of quality presets to maintain smooth gameplay.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of 60 FPS or higher is Medium, which delivers an average of 64 FPS. Stepping up to High drops performance to 53.6 FPS, below the playable threshold, while Ultra falls further to 38.7 FPS. Low settings at 4K produce 92.5 FPS, but Medium offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance at this resolution.
For 2560x1440, the data indicates that Ultra is the optimal choice, achieving 67.9 FPS on average. This is the highest quality preset that clears the 60 FPS bar. High settings at this resolution yield 87.4 FPS, Medium provides 106.2 FPS, and Low reaches 156.9 FPS, showing that there is significant headroom for players who prefer maximum frame rates over visual quality.
At 1920x1080, the combination easily handles Ultra settings with an average of 97.5 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays well above 60 FPS. The scaling is impressive: High produces 128.1 FPS, Medium hits 149.1 FPS, and Low reaches 228 FPS, making this resolution ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear pattern where the GPU becomes the dominant factor as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low and Ultra is 130.5 FPS (from 228 down to 97.5), indicating that the RTX 4070 is the primary constraint even at lower resolutions where the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads can feed frames efficiently.
Moving to 2560x1440, the spread narrows to 89 FPS between Low (156.9) and Ultra (67.9). This reduction in the performance delta as resolution climbs suggests the GPU is increasingly taxed, while the CPU's workload remains relatively static. The i5-14600K, with its 5.30 GHz boost clock and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, appears sufficient to keep the RTX 4070 fed at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the performance gap between presets compresses further to 53.8 FPS (from Low at 92.5 down to Ultra at 38.7). This tighter spread is a classic sign of GPU-bound operation. The data shows that at 4K, the RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors, while the CPU's role diminishes. The transition from 1080p Ultra (97.5 FPS) to 4K Ultra (38.7 FPS) represents a 60.8% drop, underscoring how much the GPU workload scales with pixel count.
Measured FPS Breakdown
3840x2160:
- Low: Average 92.5 FPS — the only preset at 4K that exceeds 90 FPS, showing the RTX 4070 can handle lighter loads even at high pixel counts.
- Medium: Average 64 FPS — barely clears the 60 FPS playability threshold, making this the practical ceiling for 4K gaming.
- High: Average 53.6 FPS — falls below the playable threshold, indicating a significant step-up in GPU demand from Medium.
- Ultra: Average 38.7 FPS — the most demanding preset, nearly halving the Low preset's performance.
2560x1440:
- Low: Average 156.9 FPS — excellent for competitive play, offering more than double the 60 FPS threshold.
- Medium: Average 106.2 FPS — a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, suitable for high-refresh displays.
- High: Average 87.4 FPS — maintains smooth gameplay with room to spare.
- Ultra: Average 67.9 FPS — the minimum recommendation for 1440p, still clearing the playability bar.
1920x1080:
- Low: Average 228 FPS — near the refresh rate ceiling of most monitors, ideal for esports scenarios.
- Medium: Average 149.1 FPS — well above the threshold, providing a fluid experience.
- High: Average 128.1 FPS — strong performance for a balanced visual experience.
- Ultra: Average 97.5 FPS — the highest preset remains comfortably playable, with headroom for demanding scenes.
The Verdict
This PC can run Rust at 60 FPS or higher across all three tested resolutions, but the settings ceiling varies dramatically. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 97.5 FPS. The verdict is unequivocal: this resolution is fully playable at maximum quality.
For 2560x1440, all four presets also remain playable, with Ultra achieving 67.9 FPS. The data shows that 1440p gamers can enjoy the game at its highest visual settings without dipping below the playability threshold. However, the margin at Ultra is thin, so users experiencing heavy scenes may notice occasional frame drops.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. Only Low (92.5 FPS) and Medium (64 FPS) are playable. High (53.6 FPS) and Ultra (38.7 FPS) fall short of 60 FPS. The best settings for 4K are Medium, which provides a playable average while offering better visuals than Low. This combination is not suited for 4K Ultra gaming, but it handles 4K Medium competently.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K Ultra settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 38.7 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at 4K is Medium, averaging 64 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve maximum visual quality?
A: 2560x1440 with Ultra settings delivers 67.9 FPS, making it the highest resolution where the game can run at maximum quality while still clearing 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, Ultra reaches 97.5 FPS for additional headroom.
Q: How does the performance scale from 1080p to 4K at High settings?
A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 128.1 FPS at 1920x1080 to 87.4 FPS at 2560x1440, then to 53.6 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 58.2% reduction from 1080p to 4K.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1440p?
A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 2560x1440. The performance gap between Low (156.9 FPS) and Ultra (67.9 FPS) shows significant GPU scaling, while the i5-14600K's strong single-thread performance (scoring 2064 in Cinebench R23) is sufficient to avoid CPU limitation.
Q: What FPS can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: Medium settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 149.1 FPS, which is far above the 60 FPS threshold and suitable for high refresh rate monitors.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Rust?
A: This combination ranks 768th out of 3723 tested configurations, placing it in the 79th percentile of all systems. This indicates above-average performance for the game overall.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-14600K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 pairing ranks 768th out of 3723 tested combinations for Rust, placing it in the top 21% of all systems. This strong ranking reflects the balance between the CPU's 90th percentile standing among all processors and the GPU's 81st percentile among all graphics cards.
The CPU's average benchmark score of 48618 puts it in close competition with the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (delta of -0.2%) and the AMD EPYC 4345P (delta of 0.3%). Meanwhile, the GPU's average score of 37648 places it near the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% delta) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4% delta). These close margins suggest that this combo's performance is well-balanced, with neither component significantly outclassing its peers.
Given that the game's measured performance at 1440p Ultra (67.9 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (97.5 FPS) both clear the 60 FPS threshold, the high ranking is justified. The primary limitation emerges at 4K Ultra, where the 38.7 FPS result drags down the overall experience. Still, this combo demonstrates that a mid-range CPU paired with a capable GPU can deliver a satisfying Rust experience at most settings, with only the most demanding 4K configurations proving problematic.