Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 53 | 62 | 94 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 88 | 104 | 157 |
| 1080p Full HD | 100 | 129 | 152 | 215 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT delivers a highly capable Rust experience, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and presets. The data shows a clear path to smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K remains a challenge at higher settings. Measured average FPS ranges from 38.3 at 4K Ultra to 214.8 at 1080p Low, placing this combo at rank 841 out of 3723 tested configurations. The system comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold at most settings, though the most demanding preset at 4K falls short.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RX 9070 XT shows its strength. Low settings produce an average of 214.8 FPS, which is exceptionally high for a survival game with dense environments. Medium settings drop to 152.3 FPS, still far above the playable threshold. High settings yield 129.4 FPS, and even Ultra maintains a solid 99.8 FPS average. This resolution demonstrates that the GPU is not the bottleneck here; the headroom suggests the CPU is keeping pace well.
Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with tighter margins. Low settings average 156.7 FPS, a 27% reduction from 1080p. Medium settings hit 104.4 FPS, while High manages 88 FPS. Ultra at 1440p produces 64.2 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold but leaves little room for demanding scenes or heavy player activity. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 30-35% performance drop across most presets, indicating the GPU is becoming more relevant as pixel count rises.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low settings average 94.1 FPS, which is still smooth. Medium settings drop to 61.6 FPS, barely above the playable mark. High settings fall to 53.1 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 38.3 FPS. The 4K results show a steep cliff between Medium and High, suggesting a significant workload spike. The delta between 1440p Ultra (64.2 FPS) and 4K Ultra (38.3 FPS) is a 40% loss, underscoring how demanding 4K is on this GPU.
No min or max FPS values are provided in the measured data, so the analysis relies solely on averages. This means the stability of frame pacing is not quantified, but the average figures indicate consistent performance at each setting.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, delivering an average of 99.8 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays above the playable threshold, and it does so with a comfortable margin. Gamers can enjoy maximum visual fidelity at this resolution without sacrificing smoothness.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best playable setting, averaging 64.2 FPS. This is a close call—only 4.2 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold—but it qualifies. For players who prioritize stability over eye candy, High at 88 FPS offers a much safer buffer, but the data confirms Ultra is technically playable.
For 3840x2160, the best settings are Medium, with an average of 61.6 FPS. This is the only preset above 60 FPS at 4K besides Low, which hits 94.1 FPS. High and Ultra both fall below the threshold, making them unsuitable for consistent gameplay. Medium provides the best balance of visual quality and performance at this resolution.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 99.8, which is well above the playable threshold of 60 FPS.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this CPU and GPU combo?
A: Partially. At 3840x2160, only Low (94.1 FPS) and Medium (61.6 FPS) settings clear the 60 FPS threshold. High (53.1 FPS) and Ultra (38.3 FPS) do not.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p that stays above 60 FPS?
A: Ultra is the best playable setting at 2560x1440, averaging 64.2 FPS. However, High is a safer choice at 88 FPS if you want more headroom.
Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to 1080p Ultra?
A: The 4K Ultra average is 38.3 FPS, while 1080p Ultra averages 99.8 FPS. This represents a 61% reduction in performance when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same preset.
Q: Is there a large performance gap between Medium and High at 4K?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160, Medium averages 61.6 FPS, while High drops to 53.1 FPS. That is an 8.5 FPS difference, which is significant at this resolution.
Q: Does the system ever exceed 200 FPS?
A: Yes, at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 214.8, which is the highest recorded value in this dataset.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 32233 (a 0.1% difference from the i5-14400F's 32279). The Intel Core i9-11900 is also close at 32226 (0.2% delta), as is the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS at 32354 (-0.2% delta). The Intel Core i7-12800H trails slightly at 32121 (0.5% delta). These processors would likely produce similar frame rates in Rust, assuming the GPU remains the same.
On the GPU side, the RX 9070 XT's nearest rivals are far older parts. The AMD Radeon HD 7770M scores 13536 (0.1% delta from the RX 9070 XT's 13543), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 scores 13515 (0.2% delta), and the NVIDIA P106-090 scores 13470 (0.5% delta). The AMD Radeon Pro 555 is the furthest at 13407 (1% delta). These comparisons are surprising given the RX 9070 XT's modern architecture, but the benchmark averages place them in similar territory. In practice, the RX 9070 XT would outperform these older cards in modern titles like Rust due to driver support and feature set, but the raw scores are comparable.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals how the balance shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a larger role relative to the GPU. The jump from Low (214.8 FPS) to Medium (152.3 FPS) is a 29% drop, while moving from Medium to High (129.4 FPS) is another 15% drop. At 1080p, the GPU is not fully utilized at lower settings, meaning the i5-14400F's 16 threads and 4.7 GHz boost clock are sufficient to feed the frame pipeline. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration is well-suited for Rust's multi-threaded rendering and physics.
At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take precedence. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings is 27% lower FPS (214.8 to 156.7), which is expected as pixel count increases by 78%. However, the drop from 1440p Low to 1440p Ultra is 59% (156.7 to 64.2), indicating the GPU is now the limiting factor. The CPU is still capable, but the RX 9070 XT's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus are working harder to maintain frame rates.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The 4K Ultra result of 38.3 FPS is a 40% drop from 1440p Ultra (64.2 FPS), and a 62% drop from 1080p Ultra (99.8 FPS). These deltas show that the RX 9070 XT's compute power—48.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth—is insufficient for maxed-out 4K in Rust. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, as the i5-14400F is unlikely to be the constraint when the GPU is producing sub-60 FPS.
The verdict is clear: at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU and GPU share the load effectively, but at 4K, the GPU's limitations dominate. Players seeking 4K Ultra would need a stronger GPU, while those at 1080p could potentially use a weaker CPU without significant FPS loss.
The Verdict
This system can run Rust successfully at all three tested resolutions, but with caveats. At 1920x1080, all settings are playable, with Ultra averaging 99.8 FPS—a strong result that leaves headroom for recording or background tasks. At 2560x1440, Ultra is playable at 64.2 FPS, but this is a marginal pass; High at 88 FPS is the more comfortable choice for maintaining a stable experience during intense moments like raid battles or large player gatherings.
At 3840x2160, the system is limited to Low and Medium settings for 60 FPS gameplay. Medium averages 61.6 FPS, which is just above the threshold, but any scene complexity could push it below. Low at 94.1 FPS is the safer option for 4K, though it sacrifices visual fidelity. High (53.1 FPS) and Ultra (38.3 FPS) are not recommended for competitive or smooth play.
The overall ranking of 841 out of 3723 combos places this build in the top 23% of tested configurations. The data confirms that the i5-14400F + RX 9070 XT is a solid pairing for Rust at mainstream resolutions, but 4K enthusiasts should either lower expectations or consider a more powerful GPU. For most players, the sweet spot is 1440p with High or Ultra settings, or 1080p with everything maxed out.