Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

69%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
139 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
61 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
94 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
41 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
26 FPS
12.7ms Frame Time
19ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 16,361

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 29 37 54
1440p QHD 41 53 61 94
1080p Full HD 61 79 89 139

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 79
1920x1080 Low 139
1920x1080 Medium 89
1920x1080 Ultra 61
2560x1440 High 53
2560x1440 Low 94
2560x1440 Medium 61
2560x1440 Ultra 41
3840x2160 High 29
3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 37
3840x2160 Ultra 26

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ranks 2741 out of 3723 tested combinations for Rust. This places the combo in the lower third of the database, indicating that while it can run the game, it is not positioned among high-performing configurations. The rank reflects the overall capability of this specific pairing under Rust's demanding survival sandbox environment, where large player bases, complex structures, and dynamic lighting can pressure both CPU and GPU.

Benchmark results show the combo achieving playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but falling short at 4K. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates range from 61.3 FPS on Ultra settings to 138.5 FPS on Low settings. At 2560x1440, the range narrows from 40.9 FPS on Ultra to 94.3 FPS on Low. At 3840x2160, performance drops significantly, with the best recorded average at 53.8 FPS on Low settings, which still falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The CPU holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile among all graphics cards. This disparity suggests the graphics card is the limiting factor in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. The combination's overall rank of 2741 reflects this bottleneck, as the CPU has more headroom than the GPU can utilize in Rust's rendering pipeline.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear shift in component importance as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a more substantial role, as lower pixel counts allow the RX 5700 XT to deliver higher frame rates, reaching 138.5 FPS on Low settings. The scaling from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows a drop from 138.5 FPS to 61.3 FPS, a reduction of 77.2 FPS. This wide gap indicates that settings changes heavily influence GPU load, but the CPU keeps pace even at the highest preset.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more dominant. Low settings produce 94.3 FPS, Medium produces 60.8 FPS, High produces 52.6 FPS, and Ultra produces 40.9 FPS. The step from Medium to High represents a 13.5% drop in frame rate, while the step from High to Ultra represents a 22.2% drop. These diminishing returns at higher presets show the GPU struggling to maintain performance as pixel count and visual complexity increase.

At 3840x2160, the GPU bottleneck becomes severe. Low settings yield 53.8 FPS, Medium yields 37 FPS, High yields 29.4 FPS, and Ultra yields 25.7 FPS. None of these meet the 60 FPS threshold. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 16.8 FPS, indicating that even modest settings increases overwhelm the GPU at this resolution. The CPU's role at 4K is largely passive, as the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to become CPU-bound.

Comparing resolution scaling at the same preset shows the GPU's limitations. On Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rate from 138.5 to 94.3 FPS, a 31.9% drop. Moving from 1440p to 4K reduces frame rate from 94.3 to 53.8 FPS, a 42.9% drop. On Ultra settings, the same resolution progression yields 61.3 FPS at 1080p, 40.9 FPS at 1440p, and 25.7 FPS at 4K. These consistent drops indicate that Rust's rendering demands scale linearly with pixel count, and the RX 5700 XT simply lacks the raw throughput for 4K.

The Core i5-14400F, with 10 cores and 16 threads, shows strong synthetic performance in the database, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055. However, in Rust at 4K, even a capable CPU cannot compensate for the GPU's limitations. The data suggests that for this pairing, the GPU dictates playability at all resolutions, while the CPU only becomes relevant at 1080p where frame rates exceed 100 FPS on lower presets.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1080p with maximum settings?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo delivers an average of 61.3 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The database records playable settings at this resolution as High, Low, Medium, and Ultra, with Ultra being the best settings achievable.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: The best settings at 2560x1440 are Medium, producing an average of 60.8 FPS. Low settings also clear the threshold with 94.3 FPS, but Medium offers a balance of visual quality and performance. High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS at 52.6 and 40.9 FPS respectively.

Q: Is 4K playable with this hardware?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only reach 53.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra produce 37, 29.4, and 25.7 FPS respectively. The verdict for 4K lists no playable settings.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 5700 XT has an average benchmark score of 16361. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, scores 16351, a delta of 0.1%. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, a delta of -0.3%. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, also a delta of -0.3%. These differences are negligible, meaning the GPU performs nearly identically to these alternatives.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32233, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, a delta of 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32354, a delta of -0.2%. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, a delta of 0.5%. All rivals are within 0.5% of the CPU's performance.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p on High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average frame rate is 78.8 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and represents a solid experience for most players.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-14400F's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which scores 32233 versus 32279, a delta of only 0.1%. In practical terms, this means the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U would behave nearly identically in Rust, offering the same level of CPU headroom. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, a delta of 0.2%, and would also deliver similar CPU-bound performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32354, slightly higher by 0.2%, meaning it might offer a marginal improvement in CPU-heavy scenarios, though the difference is within measurement noise. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, a delta of 0.5%, placing it just below the i5-14400F. Any of these processors would pair similarly with the RX 5700 XT, as the GPU is the limiting factor in Rust at most resolutions.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, which scores 16351 versus 16361, a delta of 0.1%. This GPU would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust, meaning users with a Pro 5600M would see the same 4K limitations and similar 1080p and 1440p performance. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, a delta of -0.3%, so it would perform essentially the same as the RX 5700 XT in this game, despite being a different architecture. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, also a delta of -0.3%, offering no meaningful advantage. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, a delta of -0.9%, which is still a negligible difference in real-world Rust performance. This clustering of scores indicates that the RX 5700 XT sits in a performance tier where minor variations in synthetic benchmarks do not translate to noticeable frame rate differences in Rust.

Given these close deltas, the practical takeaway is that any of these CPU or GPU alternatives would produce similar results in Rust. The combo's rank of 2741 out of 3723 is driven more by the GPU's 59th percentile standing than the CPU's 83rd percentile, so swapping the CPU for a rival would change little, while swapping the GPU for a higher-tier card would be necessary to improve 4K performance.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average frame rate of 61.3 FPS. This is a narrow margin above the threshold, so players seeking a buffer might prefer High settings at 78.8 FPS, but Ultra is technically playable. Low settings deliver 138.5 FPS, and Medium delivers 88.5 FPS, both also above 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 60.8 FPS. This is just above the threshold, similar to the 1080p Ultra situation. Low settings provide 94.3 FPS for those who prioritize frame rate, while High at 52.6 FPS and Ultra at 40.9 FPS fall below the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The highest recorded average is 53.8 FPS on Low settings, which still misses the threshold. Medium produces 37 FPS, High produces 29.4 FPS, and Ultra produces 25.7 FPS. The database lists no playable settings for 4K, meaning the combo cannot deliver a smooth experience at this resolution regardless of preset.

The pattern across resolutions shows that the GPU's performance ceiling is reached at 1440p Medium and 1080p Ultra. The jump from 1440p to 4K represents a doubling of pixel count, and the frame rate drops by roughly half on comparable settings, which aligns with the GPU's bandwidth and compute limitations. For players with 1080p or 1440p monitors, the combo offers playable settings, but 4K displays will require a GPU upgrade.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC can run Rust, but with clear limitations. At 1920x1080, the combo is fully playable across all presets, with Ultra settings achieving 61.3 FPS and High settings achieving 78.8 FPS. The best settings at this resolution are Ultra, which clears the 60 FPS threshold by a slim margin. Players who prefer higher frame rates can drop to Low for 138.5 FPS or Medium for 88.5 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the combo remains playable but only on Low and Medium presets. Medium delivers 60.8 FPS, which is the best playable setting, while Low delivers 94.3 FPS. High and Ultra fall short at 52.6 and 40.9 FPS respectively, making them unsuitable for maintaining a consistent 60 FPS experience.

At 3840x2160, the combo fails to reach 60 FPS on any preset. The best result is 53.8 FPS on Low, which is below the playable threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra produce 37, 29.4, and 25.7 FPS respectively, all of which would result in a stuttery or sluggish experience in Rust's fast-paced survival gameplay. The verdict for 4K lists no playable settings.

In summary, the Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT combination is a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p setup for Rust. The CPU provides ample processing power, as evidenced by its 83rd percentile ranking and strong Cinebench scores, but the GPU's 59th percentile standing limits performance at higher resolutions. Players with 1080p monitors can enjoy the game at maximum settings, while 1440p users should stick to Medium or Low. 4K is not a viable option with this hardware. The combo's rank of 2741 out of 3723 reflects this mixed capability, and the recorded data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for anyone seeking higher resolutions or more demanding presets.