Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

84%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
213 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
114 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
182 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
78 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
107 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
46 FPS
6.7ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 25,292
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 44,795

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 46 61 72 107
1440p QHD 78 103 122 182
1080p Full HD 114 150 177 213

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 150
1920x1080 Low 213
1920x1080 Medium 177
1920x1080 Ultra 114
2560x1440 High 103
2560x1440 Low 182
2560x1440 Medium 122
2560x1440 Ultra 78
3840x2160 High 61
3840x2160 Low 107
3840x2160 Medium 72
3840x2160 Ultra 46

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a high-end desktop combination, and the measured data for Rust shows a system that handles the survival title with authority across most display configurations. This analysis uses only the provided benchmark measurements to determine the best settings, compare the combo against other tested systems, and break down the exact performance at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K.

Best Settings per Resolution

For players targeting a stable 60 FPS or higher, the data identifies the most demanding preset that maintains that threshold at each resolution. At 3840x2160 (4K), the High preset delivers an average of 61 FPS, which just clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. While the Medium preset also stays playable with an average of 72 FPS, High is the most demanding option that still holds 60 FPS, making it the best choice for visual quality at 4K. The Ultra preset at this resolution drops to an average of 46 FPS, which fails to meet the playability standard.

At 2560x1440, the headroom expands significantly. The Ultra preset, the most demanding available, averages 78 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS target. This means 1440p users can run the game at maximum settings without compromise. The same applies to 1920x1080, where Ultra averages 114 FPS, providing a substantial margin over the threshold. In both lower resolutions, there is no need to dial back settings; the Ultra preset is the best option for both visual fidelity and smooth gameplay, with the 1080p result being nearly double the 60 FPS floor.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested hardware combinations for Rust, this specific pairing of the Core i5-13400F and RTX 4070 Ti holds the rank of 480 out of 3723 total combos. This places it in the top 13% of all tested systems, indicating it is a powerful configuration for this specific title. The rank reflects the combined capability of the CPU and GPU in Rust’s specific engine workload, which is known for heavy draw calls and physics calculations.

The GPU itself performs well above average in general benchmarks, sitting in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. However, the combination's rank in Rust is not merely a sum of these parts; it reflects the game's unique demands. The RTX 4070 Ti’s nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the RTX 5090 Mobile (0.8% lower score) and the RTX A6000 (1.6% higher score), showing that the GPU is in a competitive tier. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (0.4% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (0.3% lower), also show a tight grouping. That the combo ranks 480th suggests that while the individual parts are strong, other combinations in the database leverage different architectural strengths that yield better results in Rust specifically.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. The Low preset averages 213 FPS, which drops slightly to 177 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 151 FPS and a maximum of 204 FPS). The High preset averages 150 FPS, and the Ultra preset still holds a strong 114 FPS average. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p represents a 46% reduction in average FPS, but even the lowest value at Ultra remains far above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably. The Low preset averages 182 FPS, while Medium averages 122 FPS (min 104, max 140). High drops to 103 FPS, and Ultra averages 78 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at the Ultra preset shows a 31% performance hit, indicating that the resolution increase places a significant load on the GPU. At this resolution, the minimum FPS at Medium (104) is still well above 60, confirming smooth operation even in demanding scenes.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens. The Low preset still manages an average of 107 FPS, but Medium drops to 72 FPS (min 61, max 83). The High preset averages 61 FPS, which is the boundary of playability, and Ultra falls to 46 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at High settings shows a 41% reduction, which is a substantial hit that pushes the system to its limits. The minimum FPS of 61 at 4K Medium shows that the system can occasionally dip right to the threshold, but it does not go below it, ensuring a consistent experience.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K resolution with the High preset?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 61 FPS, which meets the 60 FPS playable threshold. However, the Ultra preset at this resolution averages only 46 FPS, which is not playable.

Q: What is the best setting for 2560x1440 to maintain high FPS?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 78 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that still clears the 60 FPS target. All other presets (Low, Medium, High) also exceed 60 FPS, so there is no need to reduce settings.

Q: How does the performance at 1080p compare to 1440p on the Ultra preset?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 114, while at 2560x1440 Ultra, it is 78 FPS. This represents a 31% decrease in average FPS when moving from 1080p to 1440p.

Q: Which is the most demanding preset that remains playable at 4K?

A: The High preset at 3840x2160 averages 61 FPS, which is the highest quality setting that stays at or above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset also works, but High provides better visual quality.

Q: Does this PC ever drop below 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: The data shows minimum FPS values only for the Medium preset at 2560x1440, which has a minimum of 104 FPS. This is well above 60 FPS, and the averages for all presets at this resolution are above 78 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested systems in Rust?

A: This combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti ranks 480th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the top 13% of all tested systems.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear shift in component importance depending on the resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a dominant role. The difference between Low and Ultra is 99 FPS (from 213 to 114), which shows that while the GPU is still capable, the engine’s frame rate is heavily influenced by the CPU’s ability to process game logic and draw calls. The fact that the 1080p Low preset hits 213 FPS—a very high number—suggests the CPU is strong enough to feed the GPU at lower graphical loads, but the GPU becomes the limiter as settings increase.

At 2560x1440, the GPU’s role becomes more prominent. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings shows a consistent performance drop, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound workload. For example, the High preset drops from 150 FPS at 1080p to 103 FPS at 1440p, a 31% reduction that correlates with the increase in pixel count. This indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti is the primary constraint at this resolution, while the CPU still has headroom.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is entirely the limiting factor. The average FPS at Ultra is 46, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, and the scaling from 1440p to 4K is even more pronounced. The CPU’s role diminishes as the resolution increases because the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the bottleneck. The fact that the Low preset at 4K still achieves 107 FPS shows that reducing graphical load can shift the balance back toward the CPU, but at the highest settings, the RTX 4070 Ti simply cannot keep up with the demands of 4K Ultra.

The Verdict

This PC configuration can run Rust successfully in most scenarios. The data confirms that at 1920x1080, all settings from Low to Ultra clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset averaging 114 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system also clears 60 FPS on all presets, with Ultra averaging 78 FPS. For both of these resolutions, the verdict is a clear "yes" for playability at the highest settings.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The High, Medium, and Low presets all maintain an average of at least 61 FPS, making them playable. However, the Ultra preset falls short with an average of 46 FPS. Therefore, the system can run Rust at 4K, but only if the user is willing to accept High settings as the ceiling for visual quality. The measured data indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti, while powerful, is not sufficient for maxed-out 4K performance in this title. For the best experience, 1440p Ultra offers the optimal balance of visual fidelity and smoothness, while 1080p is the resolution for maximum frame rates, particularly on High or Ultra settings.