Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
226 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
99 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
153 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
68 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
91 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
38 FPS
7.9ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 27,799
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 53 64 91
1440p QHD 68 88 105 153
1080p Full HD 99 126 153 226

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 126
1920x1080 Low 226
1920x1080 Medium 153
1920x1080 Ultra 99
2560x1440 High 88
2560x1440 Low 153
2560x1440 Medium 105
2560x1440 Ultra 68
3840x2160 High 53
3840x2160 Low 91
3840x2160 Medium 64
3840x2160 Ultra 38

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a high-performance 1080p and 1440p experience in Rust, with the data showing that the combo ranks 790th out of 3,723 tested combinations in this title. At 4K, the system begins to show its limits under the most demanding presets, though it remains capable at lower settings. The benchmark results are measured, not estimated, providing a clear picture of what this hardware can achieve in Facepunch's survival game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates show a clear scaling pattern across the three resolutions tested. At 1920x1080, the combo is overwhelmingly fast, with the Low preset producing an average of 226.4 FPS. Moving up to Medium drops that to 152.6 FPS, while High maintains a strong 125.7 FPS. The Ultra preset, the most demanding settings available, still averages 99 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, performance remains smooth but predictably lower. The Low preset delivers an average of 152.7 FPS, which is still exceptionally high. Medium averages 104.7 FPS, High drops to 87.7 FPS, and Ultra settles at 68.2 FPS. Every preset at this resolution stays above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the hardware has ample headroom for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors.

The 3840x2160 results tell a different story. Low settings produce an average of 90.7 FPS, which is playable and even smooth. Medium averages 64 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS bar. High drops to 52.8 FPS, which dips below the playable threshold, and Ultra falls further to 38.3 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming on this combo is possible only if the user is willing to compromise on visual fidelity, with Medium being the highest settings that maintains a consistent 60 FPS average.

The scaling between resolutions is steep. Dropping from 1080p to 1440p reduces the Ultra preset average from 99 FPS to 68.2 FPS, a significant 31% decrease. The jump from 1440p to 4K is even more punishing, with Ultra falling from 68.2 FPS to 38.3 FPS, a 44% reduction. These figures underscore the GPU-bound nature of Rust at higher resolutions, where pixel throughput becomes the dominant factor.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo holds the 790th position out of 3,723 tested combinations, placing it in the top 21% of all systems in the database for Rust. This percentile ranking reflects the hardware's strong overall capability, with the CPU sitting at the 79th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 81st percentile among all graphics cards.

The benchmark results indicate that this pairing is well-balanced for Rust, as neither component is dramatically outperforming the other in a way that would create a bottleneck. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27,799 is nearly identical to the GPU's average of 37,648 when normalized to their respective percentile positions, suggesting that the system is capable of feeding the graphics card efficiently at most resolutions.

At 1080p, the frame rates are high enough that the CPU becomes the limiting factor in some scenarios, particularly at Low settings where the 226.4 FPS average suggests the graphics card is waiting on the processor. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as evidenced by the sharp drop in performance when moving from Medium to High settings. The rank of 790 overall indicates that this is a solid mid-to-high-tier configuration, but there are 789 other tested combos that achieve better results in this specific game.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Intel Core i5-12600KF and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 changes dramatically across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU's role is more prominent, as the frame rates are high enough that processor performance can become a limiting factor. The 226.4 FPS average at Low settings is a strong indicator that the GPU is capable of far more work than the CPU can feed it at this resolution. The 10-core, 16-thread design of the i5-12600KF, with its 4.90 GHz boost clock, is well-suited to Rust's multi-threaded workload, but even this capable processor shows signs of being the constraint at the highest frame rates.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The 152.7 FPS average at Low settings is still high, but the gap between Low and Ultra narrows to a 55% performance difference, compared to a 56% difference at 1080p. This suggests that the GPU is becoming more involved in determining overall performance, though the CPU still has enough headroom to keep frame rates elevated.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4070 is unquestionably the primary determinant of performance. The 90.7 FPS at Low settings falls to 38.3 FPS at Ultra, a 58% reduction that is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth on the RTX 4070 are sufficient for Rust's textures at 4K, but the 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is simply not enough to maintain 60 FPS at the highest settings. The CPU's role at this resolution is minimized, as the frame rates are low enough that even a lesser processor could keep pace.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-12600KF offer nearly identical CPU performance, with delta percentages of less than 1% in either direction. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D has an average score of 27,896, which is 0.3% lower than the i5-12600KF's 27,799. This makes the Ryzen 7 5800X3D a functionally equivalent alternative for Rust, as the data shows no meaningful performance gap. The Intel Core i9-10900K is similarly close, with an average score of 27,872, just 0.3% below the i5-12600KF. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U and AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE round out the rival group, with scores of 27,887 and 27,712 respectively, all within 0.3% of the i5-12600KF's performance.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the most interesting rival, with an average score of 38,135, which is 1.3% higher than the RTX 4070's 37,648. This suggests that a laptop with an RTX 4080 Mobile could deliver slightly better frame rates in Rust, though the difference is small enough to be within run-to-run variance. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and AMD Radeon PRO W6400 are also close, with scores of 37,507 and 37,157 respectively, representing a 0.4% and 1.3% deficit compared to the RTX 4070. The NVIDIA Tesla P4, with a score of 37,628, is essentially identical to the RTX 4070 in raw benchmark terms, though its different driver and feature set would make it an impractical choice for gaming.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 99 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the highest visual quality available in Rust. The data shows that even the most demanding settings cannot push this combo below playable frame rates at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Ultra preset remains the optimal selection, with an average of 68.2 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin, though the headroom is significantly less than at 1080p. Users who prioritize frame rate over visuals could choose High instead, which averages 87.7 FPS, but the data indicates that Ultra is viable for a smooth experience.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the highest settings that maintains a 60 FPS average, delivering exactly 64 FPS. The Low preset offers more headroom at 90.7 FPS, but Medium provides a better balance of visual quality and performance. The High preset falls short at 52.8 FPS, and Ultra is not recommended at 38.3 FPS, making Medium the clear winner for 4K gaming on this hardware.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the experience depends heavily on the resolution and settings chosen. At 1920x1080, every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset averaging 99 FPS, making this an excellent 1080p configuration. At 2560x1440, all four presets also exceed 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 68.2 FPS, so the system is fully capable of high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming.

The situation changes at 3840x2160, where only the Low and Medium presets maintain a 60 FPS average. The Medium preset, at 64 FPS, is the highest quality that remains playable, while High and Ultra fall to 52.8 FPS and 38.3 FPS respectively. The verdict is clear: this combo is a strong performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Rust, capable of running the game at maximum settings with smooth frame rates. For 4K, users must settle for Medium settings to maintain playability, as the RTX 4070's compute resources are insufficient for the most demanding presets at that resolution. The data shows a well-rounded system that handles Rust exceptionally well at mainstream resolutions, with predictable performance degradation only at the extreme 4K tier.