Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

50%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
53 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
87 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
37 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
52 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
21 FPS
13.5ms Frame Time
20ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 19,039
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 15,290

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 21 30 33 52
1440p QHD 37 50 56 87
1080p Full HD 53 74 87 128

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 74
1920x1080 Low 128
1920x1080 Medium 87
1920x1080 Ultra 53
2560x1440 High 50
2560x1440 Low 87
2560x1440 Medium 56
2560x1440 Ultra 37
3840x2160 High 30
3840x2160 Low 52
3840x2160 Medium 33
3840x2160 Ultra 21

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a combination that targets 1080p gaming with room to stretch into 1440p. For Rust, the recorded data shows a clear picture: this setup handles 1080p well, offers a single playable option at 1440p, and falls short at 4K. The following analysis draws solely from measured benchmark results in the database.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1080p with High settings?

A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings is 74.1 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a comfortable margin.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the only settings preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Low. The database records an average of 87 FPS for Low, while Medium drops to 55.7 FPS and High to 50.4 FPS.

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K?

A: No. At 3840x2160, none of the four tested presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) reach 60 FPS. The highest recorded average at 4K is 52.4 FPS on Low settings, which still falls below the playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19039. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, scores 19047, which is essentially identical. Other nearby parts include the Intel Core 3 201E at 19056 and the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18982.

Q: What about the GPU's standing among all tested graphics cards?

A: The RTX 2060 sits in the 58th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 15290. The closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 with a score of 15283, followed by the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more responsible for the frame rate differences between resolutions?

A: The data shows the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to push frame rates above 120 FPS on Low, but at 4K, even the lowest preset only reaches 52.4 FPS. The frame rate drops are consistent with GPU-bound scaling as pixel count grows.

CPU and GPU Roles

The interaction between the Intel Core i5-12400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Rust shifts depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU demonstrates strong capability, with the combination producing 127.6 FPS on Low settings. This high frame rate suggests the CPU is not the primary constraint at this resolution. Moving to Medium yields 87.1 FPS, and High produces 74.1 FPS. The scaling from Low to High at 1080p reduces performance by roughly 42%, which aligns with the GPU handling the increased graphical workload.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more dominant. Low settings still produce 87 FPS, but Medium drops to 55.7 FPS and High to 50.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p (31.3 FPS) is larger than the same gap at 1080p (40.5 FPS difference between Low and Medium). This indicates that the RTX 2060's memory bandwidth and compute resources are being taxed more heavily as the pixel count increases. The RTX 2060 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The highest average frame rate recorded is 52.4 FPS on Low settings. Medium drops to 33.3 FPS, High to 29.5 FPS, and Ultra to 20.8 FPS. The CPU's performance, as measured by its 12380 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core, is sufficient to feed the GPU at 4K, but the RTX 2060 cannot render enough frames per second to hit 60 FPS.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU has spare capacity. The i5-12400F with 6 cores and 12 threads scores 19433 in PassMark multithread and 3481 in PassMark single thread. Those numbers are high enough to avoid becoming the limiting factor at lower resolutions. At 1440p and above, the GPU's performance percentile (58th) and average score (15290) place it in a range where high resolution gaming is possible only with reduced settings.

The scaling pattern is consistent with a balanced pairing for 1080p gaming. The CPU can push high frame rates on Low settings, and the GPU can sustain above 60 FPS on High settings. As the resolution moves to 1440p, the GPU's limits appear quickly, with only the least demanding preset staying playable. At 4K, even the lowest preset fails to reach 60 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the database's nearest rivals provide context for what other processors would behave similarly. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has an average score of 19047, virtually identical to the i5-12400F's 19039. A system with this laptop-class chip would produce nearly the same CPU-bound performance in Rust, though its integrated nature may affect system integration differently. The Intel Core 3 201E scores 19056, also a near match, meaning it would handle the game's CPU requirements at the same level. The Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18982, slightly lower but still close enough that frame rates would be similar in most scenarios. The AMD EPYC 7773X, with a score of 18979, is the lowest of the listed rivals but remains within 0.3% of the i5-12400F. For practical purposes, any of these CPUs would deliver the same frame pacing in Rust when paired with the same GPU.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 has an average score of 15283, which is nearly identical to the RTX 2060's 15290. This is a surprising but clear data point: a system with an older GTX 580 would produce similar frame rates in Rust, though it would lack newer features like ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The AMD Radeon 680M, a integrated GPU, scores 15270, so it would also behave similarly at the same settings and resolutions, although its memory sharing with the system could affect real-world results. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, slightly lower, and would show a small but noticeable frame rate reduction. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 15171, also slightly lower, so it would also perform within a few percent of the RTX 2060.

These alternatives suggest that for Rust, the exact GPU model matters less than the overall performance class. Any GPU in this score range (roughly 15200 to 15300) will deliver the same playable settings per resolution. The CPU alternatives similarly indicate that the i5-12400F's performance is not unique; other processors in the same score band will sustain the same frame rates.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Rust? Yes, at 1080p and 1440p under specific conditions. The verdict by resolution from the database is clear.

At 1920x1080, the system runs the game smoothly with three playable presets. High settings produce an average of 74.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings give 87.1 FPS, and Low settings reach 127.6 FPS. Ultra settings are the only preset that falls below 60 FPS, averaging 53 FPS. The best playable preset at 1080p is High, offering a good visual quality while maintaining a 14 FPS margin above the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system barely qualifies as playable. The only setting that clears 60 FPS is Low, which produces an average of 87 FPS. This is the best setting at this resolution, but it requires sacrificing most graphical effects. All other presets fall below the threshold: Medium at 55.7 FPS, High at 50.4 FPS, and Ultra at 37.3 FPS. For a 1440p monitor, the user would need to accept Low settings or consider lowering the resolution to 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the system does not meet the playability threshold on any preset. The highest average is 52.4 FPS on Low settings, which is still 7.6 FPS short of 60 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra produce 33.3, 29.5, and 20.8 FPS respectively. The data shows no playable settings at 4K for this combination.

In summary, the i5-12400F and RTX 2060 are a solid 1080p gaming pair for Rust, offering high preset support at 60 FPS. The 1440p support is limited to Low settings, and 4K is off the table.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this combination at 2872 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This puts it in the lower 23% of all tested systems for this specific game. The rank reflects that while the combo is capable of 1080p gaming, many other systems in the database deliver higher frame rates or support higher resolutions.

The rank of 2872 means that roughly 851 tested combinations outperform this setup in Rust. This is not surprising given the RTX 2060's 58th percentile GPU ranking and the i5-12400F's 73rd percentile CPU ranking. The GPU is clearly the limiting factor in this pairing, dragging the overall rank down relative to the CPU's stronger standing.

For context, the CPU's average benchmark score of 19039 places it above many CPUs, but the GPU's score of 15290 is modest. The combination's rank in-game is a composite of both, and the GPU's lower performance class dominates. This is important for anyone considering upgrades: the CPU has headroom to support a faster GPU, but the current GPU holds the system back in Rust at higher resolutions.

The rank also indicates that many systems with similar or slightly better GPUs will run Rust at higher frame rates. However, for a 1080p gaming setup, the rank is acceptable, as the system clears 60 FPS on High settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

The following settings are the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution, based on measured data.

1920x1080: The best preset is High, with an average frame rate of 74.1 FPS. This is the highest quality setting that remains above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium (87.1 FPS) and Low (127.6 FPS) also work, but High offers the best visual fidelity among playable options. Ultra is not recommended because it drops to 53 FPS.

2560x1440: The best preset is Low, with an average frame rate of 87 FPS. This is the only playable setting at this resolution. Medium (55.7 FPS), High (50.4 FPS), and Ultra (37.3 FPS) all fail to reach 60 FPS. Players at 1440p must accept Low settings or consider reducing the resolution.

3840x2160: There is no playable preset. The highest frame rate is 52.4 FPS on Low, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. Medium (33.3 FPS), High (29.5 FPS), and Ultra (20.8 FPS) are all unplayable. The database records no best setting for 4K, as no settings meet the threshold.

For players who want to use this system, the practical options are 1080p High or 1440p Low. The 1080p High setting provides a good balance of visual quality and performance. The 1440p Low setting is viable for players who prioritize resolution over detail, but it will look noticeably simpler. There is no 4K option for this configuration in Rust.