Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 35 | 41 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 45 | 59 | 70 | 104 |
| 1080p Full HD | 65 | 86 | 102 | 151 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a playable Rust experience at 1080p across all presets, but 4K gaming demands significant graphical compromises. Benchmark results show this combo ranks in the 59th percentile of all tested hardware configurations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the 3,723 combos evaluated for this title.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have closely matched rivals that would produce nearly identical frame rates in Rust. The Intel Core i5-12400F sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19,039. Its nearest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, which scores 19,047, a negligible 0% difference. The Intel Core 3 201E trails by just 0.1% with a score of 19,056, while the Intel Core i5-1335U and AMD EPYC 7773X both sit within 0.3% of the i5-12400F's performance. Any of these processors would deliver essentially identical CPU-bound behavior in Rust, though the i5-12400F's desktop orientation with 6 cores and 12 threads gives it a slight edge in sustained workloads.
For the graphics side, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 posts an average benchmark score of 16,014, placing it at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the closest rival, scoring 16,129, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 both score within 1% of the RX 9060, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 trails by 2.1%. Players upgrading from any of these cards would see virtually identical frame rates in Rust, making the RX 9060 a lateral move in raw compute terms. The RX 9060 does bring newer architecture features like RDNA 4.0 and ray tracing cores, but in pure rasterization performance, these rivals are interchangeable.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern of GPU dominance at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the RX 9060 becomes the primary bottleneck, with average frame rates dropping to 62 FPS on Low settings and only 27 FPS on Ultra. The CPU's contribution is largely masked at this resolution because the GPU cannot feed frames fast enough to stress the i5-12400F's six cores.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The RX 9060 still leads the performance curve, but the CPU begins to matter more as frame rates climb. The jump from Low to Medium settings at 1440p costs 34 FPS (104 to 70), while the Ultra preset drops another 25 FPS to 45. This scaling shows that graphical settings have a larger impact than resolution changes alone.
The 1920x1080 results demonstrate the most balanced workload. Here, the i5-12400F's 12 threads can keep pace with the RX 9060's output, allowing the GPU to stretch its legs. The gap between Low (151 FPS) and Ultra (65 FPS) at 1080p is 86 FPS, the largest spread across all resolutions. This indicates that at 1080p, both components contribute meaningfully to performance, with the CPU capable of feeding high frame rates while the GPU handles the visual load.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the RX 9060 struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 62 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings drop to 41 FPS average with a minimum of 35 and maximum of 47. High settings fall to 35 FPS average, and Ultra bottoms out at 27 FPS. None of the higher presets at 4K come close to the playable threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440 shows substantial improvement. Low settings deliver 104 FPS average, a 67% increase over 4K Low. Medium settings average 70 FPS with a range of 59 to 80, which means even the minimum frame rate occasionally dips below 60. High settings average 59 FPS, just shy of the playable mark, while Ultra drops to 45 FPS. The 1440p results suggest that Medium is the sweet spot for smooth gameplay, with High being borderline.
At 1920x1080, the combo performs admirably across the board. Low settings hit 151 FPS average, providing a massive headroom for competitive play. Medium averages 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 and maximum of 117, ensuring no drops below the playable threshold. High settings average 86 FPS, and even Ultra maintains a respectable 65 FPS average. Every preset at 1080p clears the 60 FPS line, making this resolution fully playable with any graphical configuration.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 2,190 out of 3,723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the 41st percentile of all configurations. This middling rank reflects the GPU's modest performance tier rather than the CPU, which sits in the 73rd percentile among processors. The gap between the CPU's strong showing and the GPU's average standing means the RX 9060 is the limiting factor in most scenarios.
Compared to other common pairings, this combo trails setups with higher-tier GPUs but outperforms configurations with weaker graphics cards. The 2,190th rank indicates that roughly 58% of tested combos deliver better Rust performance, which aligns with the GPU's 59th percentile standing. Players seeking higher frame rates would need to upgrade the graphics card first, as the i5-12400F provides sufficient headroom for more powerful GPUs.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 can run Rust, but the experience depends heavily on resolution. At 1920x1080, every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 65 FPS and Low reaching 151 FPS. This makes 1080p fully playable at maximum settings, though players prioritizing high refresh rates should stick to Medium or High.
At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium settings guarantee playable performance. Medium averages 70 FPS with minimums touching 59, while High sits at 59 FPS average, missing the threshold. Ultra drops to 45 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay. Players at 1440p should use Medium for a consistent experience.
At 3840x2160, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS bar, averaging 62 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below playable levels, with Ultra bottoming out at 27 FPS. 4K gaming requires significant sacrifices, and even then, the experience is marginal. The verdict is clear: this combo excels at 1080p, handles 1440p with preset limitations, and struggles at 4K.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on 1080p Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The benchmark data shows an average of 65 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?
A: Medium settings provide the best balance, averaging 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 and maximum of 80. High settings fall just short at 59 FPS average.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Only at Low settings, which average 62 FPS at 3840x2160. Medium drops to 41 FPS, High to 35 FPS, and Ultra to 27 FPS, all below the playable threshold.
Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti?
A: The RTX 3060 Ti scores 0.7% higher in average benchmarks, making the two GPUs effectively identical in performance. Players would notice no meaningful difference in Rust.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at 1080p?
A: No. At 1920x1080, the i5-12400F keeps pace with the RX 9060, as evidenced by the 151 FPS average on Low settings. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking provides sufficient headroom.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1440p High settings?
A: The average is 59 FPS, which narrowly misses the 60 FPS playable threshold. Min and max values are not recorded for this preset, but the average indicates borderline performance.