Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

46%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
76 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
32 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
53 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
22 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
32 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
12 FPS
22.7ms Frame Time
34ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 19,039
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 12,928

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 12 14 19 32
1440p QHD 22 32 32 53
1080p Full HD 32 44 49 76

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 44
1920x1080 Low 76
1920x1080 Medium 49
1920x1080 Ultra 32
2560x1440 High 32
2560x1440 Low 53
2560x1440 Medium 32
2560x1440 Ultra 22
3840x2160 High 14
3840x2160 Low 32
3840x2160 Medium 19
3840x2160 Ultra 12

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 580 delivers a narrow band of playable performance in Rust, and only at the most modest settings. The recorded data shows a system that is fundamentally limited by the GPU at higher resolutions and quality presets, though the CPU has enough headroom to push respectable frame rates when the graphical load is reduced.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark results for this combination in Rust are recorded across three resolutions and four settings presets, with the strongest performance appearing at 1080p with Low settings.

At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are as follows: Low settings produce an average of 76.2 FPS, Medium settings drop to 49.2 FPS, High settings yield 43.9 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 32.1 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium represents a significant 27 FPS loss, indicating that the RX 580's memory bandwidth and compute resources are heavily taxed as soon as texture quality and shadow details increase.

At 2560x1440, the averages decline across the board. Low settings manage 52.5 FPS, which is still below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings produce 32.0 FPS, High settings yield 32.1 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 22.0 FPS. The near-identical scores between Medium and High at this resolution suggest a bottleneck that prevents further scaling, likely the GPU's pixel fill rate or shader throughput.

At 3840x2160, the results are largely unplayable. Low settings average 31.6 FPS, Medium settings drop to 18.6 FPS, High settings manage 14.4 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 11.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 13 FPS, which is proportionally larger than the gap at 1080p, reinforcing that the RX 580's 256-bit memory interface and 8 GB GDDR5 buffer are overwhelmed by 4K rendering workloads.

Min and max frame rate values are not recorded in the database, so the analysis relies solely on average FPS. The absence of min FPS data means stutter behavior cannot be quantified, but the average values alone indicate that only the 1080p Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Intel Core i5-12400F and the AMD Radeon RX 580 across resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes relevant. The i5-12400F scores 909 in 3dmark_single_thread and 1680 in cinebench_r23_singlecore, which are strong numbers for a desktop part from the Core 12th Gen lineup. This allows the system to reach 76.2 FPS at Low settings, where the GPU is not the primary constraint.

However, as resolution increases, the GPU's role dominates. The RX 580's average benchmark score of 12928 places it in the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, and its 6.175 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for high-resolution rendering. The scaling from 1080p Low to 1440p Low shows a drop from 76.2 to 52.5 FPS, a 31% reduction. Scaling from 1080p Low to 4K Low shows a drop to 31.6 FPS, a 59% reduction. These percentages align with the GPU being the limiting factor, as pixel count increases disproportionately impact the RX 580's fill rate.

At Medium and High presets, the CPU's role diminishes further. The 1440p Medium average of 32.0 FPS is nearly identical to the 1440p High average of 32.1 FPS, and both are far below the 1080p Medium score of 49.2 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU reaches a saturation point around 32 FPS at 1440p regardless of whether Medium or High settings are applied. The CPU, with 6 cores and 12 threads, is not the bottleneck here; the i5-12400F's multicore score of 12380 in cinebench_r23 is ample for Rust's typical thread usage. Instead, the RX 580's 32 ROPs and 144 TMUs cannot keep pace with the increased fragment work at higher resolutions.

At 4K, the GPU is almost entirely responsible for the low scores. The 14.4 FPS High average and 11.7 FPS Ultra average are consistent with a GPU that is rendering nearly four times the pixels of 1080p while maintaining the same texture complexity. The CPU's contribution is negligible at this point, as even the Low preset at 4K (31.6 FPS) is lower than the 1440p High preset (32.1 FPS), proving that resolution scaling, not CPU capability, dictates performance.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on any setting?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The recorded average is 76.2 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. No other resolution or preset combination in the database reaches 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best playable settings preset for this combo?

A: The database identifies 1920x1080 Low as the best playable settings, with an average of 76.2 FPS. This is the only configuration where the system clears the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 580 perform at 1440p in Rust?

A: The RX 580 cannot sustain 60 FPS at 2560x1440 on any preset. The highest average is 52.5 FPS at Low settings, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Rust at 1080p?

A: At 1080p Low, the CPU enables the 76.2 FPS result, but the GPU limits higher presets. Medium drops to 49.2 FPS, indicating the RX 580 cannot handle increased settings even at 1080p.

Q: What happens at 4K with this combination?

A: All 4K presets are unplayable. The best average is 31.6 FPS at Low settings, and Ultra drops to 11.7 FPS. The GPU is the primary bottleneck at 3840x2160.

Q: Does the i5-12400F hold back the RX 580 in any scenario?

A: The data does not show CPU limitation. The i5-12400F's single-thread score of 909 in 3dmark_single_thread is sufficient, as frame rates scale consistently with GPU load across resolutions and settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-12400F's average benchmark score is 19039, and its nearest rivals in the database are all within a fraction of a percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 19047 with a 0% delta, meaning it would behave nearly identically in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core 3 201E scores 19056 with a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18982 with a delta of 0.3%. The AMD EPYC 7773X also scores 18979 with a 0.3% delta, though its server-oriented design would not affect gaming performance differently. Any of these CPUs would provide similar frame pacing in Rust when paired with the RX 580.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 580's average benchmark score is 12928. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, scores 12940 with a -0.1% delta, suggesting nearly identical rasterization performance. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12986 with a -0.4% delta, which is also effectively a match. The AMD Radeon 740M scores 12870 with a 0.5% delta, and the AMD FirePro W5100 scores 12847 with a 0.6% delta. All four alternatives would produce similar average FPS in Rust at the same settings, though driver-level differences in Rust's OpenGL or Vulkan paths could cause minor variations not captured in the aggregate scores.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 580 ranks 3389 out of 3723 tested combos in the database for Rust. This places the system in the bottom 9% of all configurations, which is consistent with the GPU's age and the game's demanding rendering pipeline. The rank reflects that most modern gaming PCs, even those with mid-range GPUs from later generations, outperform this pairing. The RX 580's percentile of 53 among all GPUs and the i5-12400F's percentile of 73 among all CPUs do not translate into a competitive gaming result for Rust, because the game stresses the GPU heavily at higher settings.

The low rank is driven primarily by the 4K and 1440p results, where the RX 580 falls far below playable levels. Even at 1080p, only the Low preset clears 60 FPS, and the Medium preset at 49.2 FPS is 18% below the threshold. The CPU's strong relative standing (73rd percentile) does not compensate for the GPU's mid-pack performance, as Rust's frame rate scales more with GPU throughput than CPU single-thread speed in the recorded data.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but only under strict conditions. The database's verdict by resolution states that 1920x1080 with Low settings is the sole playable configuration, achieving an average of 76.2 FPS. At 2560x1440, no settings preset reaches 60 FPS; the best case is Low at 52.5 FPS, which is 12.5% below the threshold. At 3840x2160, all presets are unplayable, with the highest average being 31.6 FPS at Low.

For a player targeting 1080p gaming, this combination is viable for Rust at the lowest quality settings. The 76.2 FPS average provides a smooth experience in most scenarios, though the lack of min FPS data means occasional dips cannot be ruled out. For 1440p or 4K, the system is not suitable, and users would need to lower resolution or accept sub-60 FPS gameplay. The i5-12400F has enough headroom for future GPU upgrades, but the RX 580 is the limiting factor in this pairing, and its 8 GB VRAM and 185 W TDP reflect its age. As a 1080p Low-settings machine, it works; as anything more, it falls short.