Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 46 | 51 | 78 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 78 | 91 | 134 |
| 1080p Full HD | 84 | 110 | 134 | 195 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti combination delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p gaming experience in Rust, with the data indicating that the system’s performance ceiling is firmly at 1440p High settings. At 4K, the hardware struggles to maintain smooth frame rates on demanding presets, though it remains playable on Low settings. The benchmark results show a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions, with the GPU and CPU working in tandem to provide a solid foundation for the survival title.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU in this configuration each have close rivals that would produce nearly identical performance in Rust. The Intel Core i5-12400 sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18683. Its nearest competitor is the AMD EPYC 7643, which scores 18697, a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i7-1355U is similarly matched at 18730, just 0.3% ahead. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 leads this group with a score of 18811, a 0.7% advantage, while the Intel Core i3-14100F trails slightly at 18519, which is 0.9% behind. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly interchangeable frame rates in Rust, meaning the system’s overall performance is not uniquely tied to the specific i5-12400 model.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks at the 75th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 29945. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, which scores 29928, a difference of just 0.1%. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 0.5% faster at 30095, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is 0.5% slower at 29783. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is the outlier, scoring 30433, which is 1.6% higher. For Rust specifically, these deltaPct values suggest that swapping the RTX 3070 Ti for any of these alternatives would result in frame rate differences of only a few FPS at most, making them all viable substitutes.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the system can run Rust at Ultra settings while maintaining an average of 83.7 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold with ample headroom. This is the most demanding preset available, and the fact that it stays above 60 FPS makes it the clear choice for maximum visual fidelity. The Medium preset delivers 134 FPS and Low hits 195.2 FPS, but neither is necessary given the Ultra performance.
Moving to 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, which produces an average of 78.4 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, though the Ultra preset drops to 59.4 FPS, just missing the playable mark. The Medium setting runs at 90.7 FPS and Low at 134.1 FPS, so High offers the best balance of visual quality and performance at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. The only playable setting is Low, which averages 78.4 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 51 FPS, High drops to 46 FPS, and Ultra is unplayable at 32.4 FPS. For 4K gaming, users must sacrifice visual quality significantly to stay above 60 FPS, as no preset other than Low achieves the playable threshold.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system achieves an average of 83.7 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest playable setting at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the High preset runs at 78.4 FPS average. The Ultra preset falls to 59.4 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS playable mark, so High is the best choice.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Only on Low settings. At 3840x2160, Low averages 78.4 FPS, but Medium drops to 51 FPS, High to 46 FPS, and Ultra to 32.4 FPS, making those presets unplayable.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest alternatives?
A: The Intel Core i5-12400 scores 18683 on average benchmarks. The AMD EPYC 7643 is 0.1% faster, the Intel Core i7-1355U is 0.3% faster, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 is 0.7% faster. The Intel Core i3-14100F is 0.9% slower.
Q: What GPU alternatives would perform similarly?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti scores 29945 on average. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is 0.1% faster, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 0.5% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 is 1.6% faster. The RTX 2080 Ti is 0.5% slower.
Q: What is the best overall resolution for this combo?
A: 2560x1440 at High settings offers 78.4 FPS, balancing visual quality and performance. At 1080p Ultra, the system hits 83.7 FPS, but 1440p provides a sharper image while still clearing the 60 FPS threshold.
The Verdict
The data clearly shows that this PC can run Rust at 1080p and 1440p with playable frame rates. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all four tested presets, with Ultra averaging 83.7 FPS. The 2560x1440 resolution is the sweet spot, where High settings produce 78.4 FPS, though Ultra just misses the mark at 59.4 FPS. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable performance at 78.4 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 60 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms this: 1080p Ultra is fully playable, 1440p High is the best playable setting, and 4K is limited to Low. For users prioritizing visual quality, 1440p High is the recommended configuration, as it provides a substantial resolution upgrade over 1080p while maintaining smooth frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest performance. Low settings average 195.2 FPS, Medium averages 134 FPS, and High averages 109.5 FPS. Ultra settings, the most demanding preset, still achieve an average of 83.7 FPS. Every preset at this resolution comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold, with even the lowest performance being 39.5% above the minimum required.
At 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably. Low settings run at 134.1 FPS, Medium at 90.7 FPS, and High at 78.4 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 59.4 FPS, which is just 0.6 FPS below the 60 FPS playable mark, indicating that a minor settings tweak or driver update could potentially push it over the threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra is 74.7 FPS, showing a substantial performance cost for maximum visual fidelity.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Low settings average 78.4 FPS, which is playable but represents a significant drop from the 134.1 FPS seen at 1440p Low. Medium falls to 51 FPS, High to 46 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 32.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 46 FPS, meaning the most demanding preset runs at less than half the speed of the least demanding one.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks 1308 out of 3723 tested combos in Rust. This places the system in the upper third of all configurations tested, with 64.9% of combos ranking below it. The percentile ranking of the individual components supports this position: the CPU sits at the 72nd percentile and the GPU at the 75th percentile, indicating that both parts are above-average performers. The combo’s rank suggests that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it significantly outperforms the majority of systems running Rust, and the measured FPS data confirms that it delivers smooth gameplay at standard resolutions with high visual settings.