Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 64 | 77 | 113 |
| 1440p QHD | 83 | 109 | 112 | 132 |
| 1080p Full HD | 106 | 119 | 127 | 147 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
How This Combo Ranks
This combo ranks 923rd out of 3,723 tested combinations in Rust, placing it in the top quarter of all tested systems. The percentile data supports this: the CPU sits at the 68th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. That gap matters. The GPU is clearly the stronger component here, and the pairing produces a system that is comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold at every resolution tested, though the margin shrinks considerably at 4K Ultra.
The recorded data shows a system that handles Rust with room to spare at 1080p and 1440p, but at 2160p the ceiling becomes visible. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 50, which falls below the playable threshold. The overall rank of 923 out of 3,723 means this combination outperforms roughly 75% of all tested combos, a strong result driven primarily by the GPU's high percentile ranking. The CPU's 68th percentile is respectable but not elite, and in Rust, which can be demanding on both components, this balance shows in the scaling patterns across resolutions and settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a GPU-bound system at higher resolutions and a more balanced profile at 1080p. Looking at the scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings, average FPS drops from 106.4 to 83.4, a 21.6% reduction. From 1440p to 4K Ultra, the drop is steeper: from 83.4 to 50, a 40% reduction. This accelerating decline as resolution increases is the classic signature of a GPU-limited configuration. The RTX 5070 Ti is doing the heavy lifting, and at 4K Ultra it simply runs out of headroom.
At lower settings, the CPU's role becomes more apparent. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 147.1 FPS, while at 4K Low it still manages 112.5 FPS. The relatively modest drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low (147.1 to 132.1, an 10.2% reduction) compared to the larger drop at Ultra settings suggests that at Low presets, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads can keep feeding frames, but the GPU still scales with resolution.
The CPU's single-thread performance, as measured by its 3DMark single-thread score of 688 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,451, is adequate for Rust's typical load patterns. The multi-thread results, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,283 and a PassMark multithread score of 12,115, show a processor that can handle background tasks while gaming. However, the data shows that at 4K Ultra, no amount of CPU headroom compensates for the GPU's 43.94 TFLOPS being fully taxed. The verdict is clear: at 1080p and 1440p, both components matter, but at 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 106.4 FPS. This is a comfortable margin, 77% above the playable threshold. The data shows all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution, with Low reaching 147.1 FPS and Medium hitting 127.2 FPS. High sits at 118.5 FPS. Ultra is the clear recommendation for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.
At 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best playable setting, averaging 83.4 FPS. This is 39% above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a solid experience. The full range of presets is playable here: Low at 132.1 FPS, Medium at 112.3 FPS, and High at 108.6 FPS. The margin at Ultra is sufficient for most players, though those sensitive to frame drops might prefer High for extra headroom.
At 3840x2160, the situation changes. Ultra drops to 50 FPS, below the playable threshold. The best playable setting is High, averaging 63.9 FPS, which is just 6.5% above the threshold. Medium is also playable at 76.5 FPS, and Low reaches 112.5 FPS. For 4K owners, High is the sweet spot, but the narrow margin means players should monitor their experience closely. Medium provides a safer buffer if frame consistency is a priority.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores, the Intel Core i5-10400F (average score 14,185) is nearly identical in overall performance to several other processors. The Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14,163, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14,232, which is 0.3% higher. The AMD EPYC 7552 scores 14,115, 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C scores 14,277, 0.6% higher. Any of these would behave nearly indistinguishably in Rust at the tested settings, as the performance deltas are all well under 1%.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (average score 49,957) has close rivals that would produce similar frame rates. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50,001, just 0.1% higher. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49,737, 0.4% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50,951, 2% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48,477, 3.1% lower. In practice, swapping to any of these GPUs would yield frame rates within a few percent of what the RTX 5070 Ti delivers in Rust, meaning the best settings per resolution would remain essentially unchanged.
For a system builder, pairing the i5-10400F with a GPU from this performance band (RX 6900 XT or RX 6800 XT, for instance) would produce nearly identical results. The CPU's 68th percentile ranking suggests that even a modestly stronger processor would not unlock significantly more FPS at 4K, since the GPU is the bottleneck there.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the recorded data shows the following averages across presets. Low: 147.1 FPS. Medium: 127.2 FPS. High: 118.5 FPS. Ultra: 106.4 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 27.7% reduction in frame rate, a moderate cost for the visual upgrade.
At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 132.1 FPS, Medium at 112.3 FPS, High at 108.6 FPS, and Ultra at 83.4 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra is notably steep, a 23.2% reduction, suggesting that Ultra settings at 1440p place a significant load on the GPU.
At 3840x2160, the data shows: Low at 112.5 FPS, Medium at 76.5 FPS, High at 63.9 FPS, and Ultra at 50 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 16.5%, and between High and Ultra is 21.8%. This resolution is where the GPU's limits become apparent, with only the three lower presets clearing the 60 FPS threshold.
It is worth remembering the database records only average FPS values for this combo, with no minimum or maximum frame time data available. The averages alone suggest a generally smooth experience at playable settings, but players with high-refresh monitors should note that at 4K High, the 63.9 FPS average leaves little headroom for demanding scenes.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with all settings maxed out?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 50, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable 4K setting is High, averaging 63.9 FPS.
Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 83.4 FPS, which is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. All four presets are playable at this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in performance?
A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14,185. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6756E (14,163, 0.2% lower), the Intel Core 7 160UL (14,232, 0.3% higher), the AMD EPYC 7552 (14,115, 0.5% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (14,277, 0.6% higher). All are within 1% of each other.
Q: Is the GPU the bottleneck at 4K?
A: Yes, the data indicates a GPU-bound configuration at higher resolutions. The frame rate drops 40% from 1440p Ultra (83.4 FPS) to 4K Ultra (50 FPS), while the drop from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra is 21.6%. This accelerating decline points to the GPU being the limiting factor.
Q: What GPU would perform similarly to the RTX 5070 Ti in this game?
A: The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (0.1% higher average score), Intel Arc A550M (0.4% lower), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2% higher), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (3.1% lower) are all within a few percent of the RTX 5070 Ti's average benchmark score of 49,957.
Q: What is the overall ranking of this combo among tested systems?
A: This combination of Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti ranks 923rd out of 3,723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the top quarter of all tested systems.