Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

47%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
149 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
70 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
112 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
48 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
66 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
10.9ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 14,185
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 38 44 66
1440p QHD 48 64 75 112
1080p Full HD 70 92 110 149

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 92
1920x1080 Low 149
1920x1080 Medium 110
1920x1080 Ultra 70
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Low 112
2560x1440 Medium 75
2560x1440 Ultra 48
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 66
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Rust, but the data clearly shows that 4K gaming requires significant compromises. At 1080p, the combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, including Ultra. At 1440p, it remains comfortably above 60 FPS on High settings. The system ultimately falls short of sustained 60 FPS at 4K on Medium or higher presets, making 1440p the practical ceiling for high-detail play.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database places the Intel Core i5-10400F in the 68th percentile among all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 14185. The closest rivals are tightly clustered, indicating that swapping to any of these chips would produce nearly identical system performance. The Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14163, a delta of 0.2 percent, meaning it is effectively a match. The AMD EPYC 7552 trails by 0.5 percent with a score of 14115. On the other side, the Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232 (0.3 percent higher), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C leads this group by 0.6 percent with 14277. For gaming, any of these CPUs would offer virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Rust, as the differences are all under one percent.

The GPU side shows a similar pattern, though with an unexpected set of rivals. The RTX 4060 sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest measured competitor is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 17666, a delta of -0.2% (meaning the Radeon is slightly higher). The AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon Pro 460 trail by 0.5% and 0.7% respectively. These results indicate that despite being a modern Ada Lovelace part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, the RTX 4060's aggregate compute performance sits in a surprisingly crowded field of older and integrated solutions. For Rust, however, the measured FPS figures show the RTX 4060 is far more capable in real-world gaming than that percentile ranking suggests, as the game is less dependent on raw GPU compute.

Best Settings per Resolution

The recorded data identifies the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of 60 FPS or higher at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra, delivering an average of 70 FPS. This is the only resolution where the top preset clears the playable threshold. Medium runs at 110 FPS, High at 92 FPS, and Low at 149 FPS, but none of those are needed to achieve smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, with an average of 64 FPS. This is a marginal pass, sitting just 4 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium runs at 75 FPS, and Low at 112 FPS. Ultra drops to 48 FPS, which fails the 60 FPS target.

At 3840x2160, only Low is playable, averaging 66 FPS. Medium falls to 44 FPS, High to 38 FPS, and Ultra to 29 FPS. None of these higher presets come close to the threshold, so Low is the only viable option at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 1080p gaming with this CPU and GPU?

A: The database shows the Ultra preset achieves an average of 70 FPS at 1920x1080. This is the highest setting that maintains at least 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for full HD monitors.

Q: Can this system run the game at 1440p?

A: Yes. The High preset delivers an average of 64 FPS at 2560x1440, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium and Low also pass, but High is the most demanding preset that remains playable.

Q: Is 4K gaming feasible with the RTX 4060?

A: Only at the Low preset, which averages 66 FPS at 3840x2160. Medium drops to 44 FPS, High to 38 FPS, and Ultra to 29 FPS, all of which fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low averages 149 FPS, while Ultra averages 70 FPS. That is a 79 FPS gap, or roughly 53% fewer frames when switching from the lowest to highest quality preset.

Q: How does this system rank among all combos tested for Rust?

A: The combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 2072 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the 56th percentile overall (computed as 1 - 2072/3723).

Q: What is the most stable preset in terms of FPS consistency?

A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 shows the least variance, with a minimum of 93 FPS and a maximum of 126 FPS, averaging 110 FPS. At 2560x1440, Medium ranges from 64 to 87 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it ranges from 38 to 51 FPS.

The Verdict

The recorded data provides a clear verdict: this system can run Rust at 60 FPS or higher across all three tested resolutions, but only with significant settings adjustments at higher resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the verdict is fully positive. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS threshold. The most demanding preset, Ultra, averages 70 FPS, meaning the hardware has headroom even at maximum settings.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable, but the margin narrows. High settings average 64 FPS, which is technically above the threshold but leaves little room for complex scenes. Medium averages 75 FPS, providing a safer buffer. Ultra fails at 48 FPS, so it is not recommended for 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is strict. Only the Low preset is playable, averaging 66 FPS. Every other preset fails: Medium at 44 FPS, High at 38 FPS, and Ultra at 29 FPS. For 4K, users must accept the lowest visual quality or use upscaling tools.

Overall, the RTX 4060 is a capable 1080p card and a decent 1440p card for this title. The 4K results are poor, with a 45% reduction in average FPS when moving from Low to Medium. The system is best suited for 1080p Ultra or 1440p High/Medium.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database contains average FPS readings for each resolution and settings combo. Only two resolutions, 1440p and 1080p at Medium, have complete min/max data.

3840x2160

  • Low: 66 FPS average
  • Medium: 44 FPS average, 38 FPS minimum, 51 FPS maximum
  • High: 38 FPS average
  • Ultra: 29 FPS average

2560x1440

  • Low: 112 FPS average
  • Medium: 75 FPS average, 64 FPS minimum, 87 FPS maximum
  • High: 64 FPS average
  • Ultra: 48 FPS average

1920x1080

  • Low: 149 FPS average
  • Medium: 110 FPS average, 93 FPS minimum, 126 FPS maximum
  • High: 92 FPS average
  • Ultra: 70 FPS average

The data shows a consistent pattern: each settings tier reduces FPS by roughly 15-20% from the previous tier, with the exception of the jump from Low to Medium at 1440p, which is a 33% drop. The minimum FPS values at Medium settings (93 at 1080p, 64 at 1440p) prove that even the lowest 1% lows stay above 60 FPS for those preset-resolution combos.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 2072 out of 3723 tested CPU/GPU combos in Rust. This places it in the upper-middle of the database, roughly in the 56th percentile (computed from the rank of 2072 / 3723).

This ranking is noteworthy because the CPU sits in the 68th percentile and the GPU in the 62nd percentile individually, but the combined score is slightly lower than either component's individual standing. That suggests Rust is partially limited by the CPU in some scenarios, or that the game does not scale perfectly with the GPU's resources. The measured FPS data supports this: at 1080p, the gap between the GPU-bound Ultra setting (70 FPS) and the CPU-bound Low setting (149 FPS) is large, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU well at lower settings but is not the bottleneck at high settings.

When compared to the nearest rivals, the system's performance is close. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C, is 0.6% faster, and the GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 780M, is 0.3% slower. These small deltas suggest that swapping to any of those alternatives would not materially change the gaming experience for better or worse.

The rank implies that a significant number of tested combos, 1651, deliver a faster experience in Rust. Those would likely include higher-tier CPUs and GPUs like the RTX 4070 or 4080 with more powerful processors. However, for the specific goal of 1080p Ultra or 1440p High, this combo is sufficient. It only falls short for 4K enthusiasts, where few combos in the database would offer a meaningful improvement at the Ultra preset.