Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

46%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
163 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
70 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
115 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
49 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
68 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
31 FPS
10.9ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 31 38 43 68
1440p QHD 49 65 77 115
1080p Full HD 70 92 111 163

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 92
1920x1080 Low 163
1920x1080 Medium 111
1920x1080 Ultra 70
2560x1440 High 65
2560x1440 Low 115
2560x1440 Medium 77
2560x1440 Ultra 49
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Low 68
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 31

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a split verdict in Rust, heavily dependent on the target resolution. At 1080p, this combo is fully capable of running the game at maximum settings with room to spare, while 1440p demands a slight reduction in quality to maintain smooth gameplay. At 4K, the hardware is stretched thin, with only the lowest preset providing a playable frame rate. The data reveals a system where the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck as resolution climbs, while the CPU holds its own across the board.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that keeps the average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS threshold is Low, which produces an average of 68.4 FPS. The jump to Medium drops performance to 42.9 FPS, a steep decline that makes it unplayable by the 60 FPS standard.

For 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, achieving an average of 65.3 FPS. This is the only preset above the 60 FPS line other than Low, which hits 115.1 FPS. Medium trails at 76.9 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while staying comfortably above the playable threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system can push Ultra settings with an average of 70 FPS, making it the most demanding playable preset. This is notable because it shows the combo has headroom at this resolution, with High averaging 91.5 FPS and Medium at 111.1 FPS. The Low preset exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors at 163.2 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions reveals a clear shift in workload distribution. At 1920x1080, the frame rates across presets suggest the CPU is keeping pace with the GPU, as the RTX 4060 can push very high numbers without being held back. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 93.2 FPS (from 163.2 down to 70), indicating that the GPU has significant headroom when the CPU is not the limiting factor.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across all settings, but the relative scaling remains similar. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 66.4 FPS (115.1 to 48.7), which points to the GPU beginning to take on more responsibility for the final image output. The fact that High still clears 60 FPS here, while Ultra does not, suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth or shading resources become a constraint at higher resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes dominant. The difference between Low and Ultra is 37.6 FPS (68.4 to 30.8), and even Medium fails to reach 60 FPS. The RTX 4060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely the limiting factors at 4K, as the pixel throughput demands increase fourfold compared to 1080p. The CPU, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, appears sufficient at all resolutions, as the frame rates scale predictably with resolution rather than showing erratic CPU-bound behavior.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160:

  • Low: Average 68.4 FPS — the only playable setting at this resolution, with a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
  • Medium: Average 42.9 FPS — a significant drop that makes it unsuitable for smooth gameplay.
  • High: Average 37.9 FPS — slightly worse than Medium, showing diminishing returns as settings increase.
  • Ultra: Average 30.8 FPS — the lowest performance tier, with less than half the frame rate of Low.

2560x1440:

  • Low: Average 115.1 FPS — excellent performance, nearly double the playable threshold.
  • Medium: Average 76.9 FPS — solidly playable, with a noticeable improvement over High.
  • High: Average 65.3 FPS — just above the 60 FPS line, offering the best visual fidelity that remains playable.
  • Ultra: Average 48.7 FPS — falls short of the target, highlighting the cost of maximum settings at this resolution.

1920x1080:

  • Low: Average 163.2 FPS — exceptional performance, ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.
  • Medium: Average 111.1 FPS — still very high, with a substantial buffer above 60 FPS.
  • High: Average 91.5 FPS — smooth and responsive, with plenty of overhead for demanding scenes.
  • Ultra: Average 70 FPS — the most demanding preset, but it stays above the playable threshold, albeit with less headroom than other settings.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core i3-12100F + RTX 4060 run Rust at 4K?

A: Yes, but only on Low settings, which produces an average of 68.4 FPS. Medium drops to 42.9 FPS, so it is not recommended for a consistent experience above 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: High settings provide the best balance, with an average of 65.3 FPS. While Low and Medium also clear 60 FPS at 115.1 and 76.9 FPS respectively, High offers the highest visual quality that remains playable.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 the bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is not the limiting factor at 1080p, as the average frame rates reach 163.2 FPS on Low and 70 FPS on Ultra. The CPU's 4 cores appear sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution.

Q: How much performance is lost when switching from 1080p to 4K?

A: At Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops from 70 FPS at 1920x1080 to 30.8 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 39.2 FPS. This highlights the GPU's limited capacity for 4K rendering.

Q: Does the RTX 4060's 8 GB memory limit performance at higher resolutions?

A: The data shows a steep decline from 1440p to 4K, with the 4K Ultra average falling to 30.8 FPS versus 48.7 FPS at 1440p Ultra. This suggests memory capacity or bandwidth becomes a constraint at higher resolutions.

Q: What frame rate can I expect on Medium settings at 1080p?

A: Medium settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 111.1 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and provides a smooth experience.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i3-12100F and RTX 4060 combination ranks 1969 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations, indicating that it outperforms roughly 53% of tested systems. While not a top-tier setup, the ranking reflects its ability to handle the game at 1080p and 1440p with playable settings.

The CPU's percentile versus all processors is 68, meaning it performs better than 68% of tested CPUs, while the GPU's percentile is 61. This suggests the pairing is balanced, with the CPU having a slight advantage over the GPU in relative performance. The combo's ranking in-game is influenced by Rust's demanding nature, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus become limiting.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all presets, including Ultra with an average of 70 FPS. This makes it fully capable of delivering a smooth experience at the most common gaming resolution.

At 2560x1440, the combo remains playable on High, Medium, and Low settings, with High averaging 65.3 FPS. Ultra, however, falls to 48.7 FPS, so users should avoid maximum settings at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings achieve a playable frame rate of 68.4 FPS. All other presets drop below 60 FPS, with Ultra as low as 30.8 FPS. For 4K gaming, users would need to compromise heavily on visual quality or consider a more powerful GPU.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core 3 N355 offers nearly identical average benchmark scores at 13492 versus the i3-12100F's 13494, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core i5-9500 trails by just 0.3% with a score of 13452, making it a comparable option. The Intel Core 5 120UL is slightly ahead at 13594 (delta of -0.7%), while the Intel Core i7-1250U comes in at 13351, a 1.1% difference. All four would behave similarly in Rust, with the i5-9500 being the closest match in performance.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 versus the RTX 4060's 17639, a delta of -0.2%, making it a near-identical performer. The AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% slower at 17588, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 trail by 0.5% and 0.7% respectively. These alternatives would produce similar frame rates in Rust, though the older AMD cards may lack modern driver optimizations.

The data makes it clear that this combo is a solid mid-range option for Rust, with the CPU providing enough single-thread performance for the game's logic and the GPU handling up to 1440p High settings effectively. The 4K results are the weakest point, but for most players targeting 1080p or 1440p, this pairing delivers a smooth and enjoyable experience.