Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 46 | 56 | 82 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 82 | 93 | 141 |
| 1080p Full HD | 90 | 115 | 138 | 203 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
Rust on an Intel Core i3-12100F paired with an AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT is a tale of two components: a modest quad-core CPU from Intel's 12th Gen Alder Lake lineup feeding a seriously capable RDNA 3 GPU. The measured data shows this combination handles Facepunch's survival sandbox comfortably at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K demands compromise. The pairing ranks 1204th out of 3723 tested combos in Rust — solidly in the upper third, though not the strongest configuration the game has seen.
FAQ
Q: Can the i3-12100F + RX 7800 XT run Rust at 1080p on max settings? A: Yes. At 1920x1080 on Ultra, the combo averages 89.6 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Every preset at 1080p clears 60 FPS, from Low (203 FPS) through Ultra.
Q: What about 1440p? A: 1440p works on everything except Ultra. High is the best preset that stays playable, averaging 81.9 FPS, while Ultra dips to 58.8 FPS — just under the 60 FPS line.
Q: Is 4K viable? A: Only on Low. The combo averages 81.9 FPS at 3840x2160 on Low, but Medium falls to 55.7 FPS, High to 45.7 FPS, and Ultra to 34.9 FPS — all below the threshold.
Q: How powerful is the i3-12100F relative to other CPUs? A: It sits in the 68th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13494. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 3 N355 (13492, 0% delta), Intel Core i5-9500 (13452, 0.3% ahead), Intel Core 5 120UL (13594, 0.7% ahead), and Intel Core i7-1250U (13351, 1.1% behind).
Q: How does the RX 7800 XT compare to other GPUs? A: It ranks in the 51st percentile with an average score of 11627, and its benchmark database rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (-0.5%), AMD Radeon Pro 5500M (+0.9%), NVIDIA Tesla K20c (+1.3%), and AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT (-1.8% in the combo's favor).
Q: How does this pairing rank in Rust specifically? A: It ranks 1204 out of 3723 tested combinations — roughly the top third of configurations benchmarked in the game.
Similar Performance Alternatives
On the CPU side, the i3-12100F's aggregate score of 13494 puts it in a tight cluster of processors that would behave nearly identically in Rust. The Intel Core 3 N355 averages 13492 — a dead-even match at 0% delta. The Intel Core i5-9500 sits 0.3% behind, the Intel Core 5 120UL runs 0.7% ahead, and the Intel Core i7-1250U trails by 1.1%. Any of these chips would deliver statistically indistinguishable frame rates alongside the same GPU, since the spread across the entire group is barely more than a single percentage point.
For the GPU, the RX 7800 XT's average score of 11627 has equally close neighbors. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11680, just 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500M averages 11528 (0.9% behind), the NVIDIA Tesla K20c 11479 (1.3% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 11842 (1.8% ahead). Swapping in any of these cards would move Rust frame rates by only a couple of percent in either direction, according to the aggregate data — though the RX 7800 XT's raw specs, including 3840 shading units, 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, and 624.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth, give it substantial headroom for higher resolutions and texture-heavy scenarios.
Best Settings per Resolution
1920x1080 — Ultra, 89.6 FPS. The full preset stack is playable at 1080p. Low runs at 203 FPS, Medium at 138.1 FPS, High at 115.2 FPS, and Ultra still clears the bar at 89.6 FPS. There is no reason to drop settings at this resolution.
2560x1440 — High, 81.9 FPS. Ultra falls just short at 58.8 FPS, so High is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Medium (93.3 FPS) and Low (140.8 FPS) provide further headroom if competitive frame rates matter more than visual fidelity.
3840x2160 — Low, 81.9 FPS. 4K is where the preset ladder collapses. Medium averages 55.7 FPS, High 45.7 FPS, and Ultra 34.9 FPS. Low, at 81.9 FPS, is the only setting that clears the threshold. Players wanting a middle-ground 4K experience don't have one with this combo — the jump from Low to Medium costs the 60 FPS line outright.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC runs Rust — decisively at 1080p and 1440p, conditionally at 4K. The verdict data shows 1920x1080 playable on all four presets with Ultra as the best option at 89.6 FPS average. At 2560x1440, High, Medium, and Low all clear 60 FPS, with High the top playable preset at 81.9 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low qualifies, again at 81.9 FPS.
The practical summary: 1080p players get the complete Rust experience with every visual option enabled. 1440p players give up one preset tier. 4K players must strip the game back to Low, and even then enjoy a healthy frame rate — but the 58.8 FPS result on Ultra at 1440p shows how sharply the ceiling drops once resolution climbs. For a survival game where sustained frame rates matter during base raids and large server populations, the 1440p High configuration is arguably the sweet spot, pairing near-maximum visuals with a 35%+ cushion above the threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured scaling tells a clear story: this game configuration is GPU-bound at higher resolutions and the RX 7800 XT does the heavy lifting. At 1080p Ultra the combo manages 89.6 FPS. Moving to 1440p Ultra drops that to 58.8 FPS — a 34% decline driven almost entirely by the quadrupled pixel workload, since the CPU load is unchanged between resolutions. At 4K Ultra the number falls further to 34.9 FPS. That resolution-driven collapse is the signature of a GPU-limited scenario, and it means the RX 7800 XT, with its 37.32 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 233.3 GPixel/s pixel fill rate, is the component setting the performance ceiling at 1440p and 4K.
At 1080p, the picture shifts. The 203 FPS result on Low suggests the frame rate is no longer purely GPU-limited and the quad-core, eight-thread i3-12100F becomes the restraining factor. Its benchmark profile supports this: a single-thread Passmark score of 3444 and Geekbench single-core score of 1932 are strong for its class, but the multi-threaded results — Cinebench R23 multi-core at 11860 and PassMark multithread at 14015 — reflect the constraints of a 4-core part. The 3DMark thread scaling data makes the ceiling visible: the CPU scores 2859 with 4 threads but 4051 with 16 threads on tests where more cores can be exploited, indicating Rust's heavier simulation moments would benefit from additional threads this chip simply doesn't have.
Preset scaling reinforces the split. At 4K, dropping from Ultra (34.9 FPS) to Low (81.9 FPS) more than doubles the frame rate — a GPU-side lever. At 1080p, the same drop goes from 89.6 to 203 FPS, a larger absolute gain but with the Low result likely brushing against what the CPU can feed. In short: at 1080p, upgrade the CPU for more frames; at 1440p and 4K, the GPU is already the deciding component.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the Rust benchmark database, the i3-12100F + RX 7800 XT pairing ranks 1204th out of 3723 tested combinations. That places it in the top third — a respectable showing, roughly the 68th percentile of configurations if the distribution is treated as linear. It is not an elite pairing: the CPU's 68th percentile standing among all CPUs, sitting level with chips like the Core 3 N355 and Core i5-9500, caps how high the combo can climb, and the measured 1440p and 4K results confirm the ceiling.
Context matters, though. The RX 7800 XT carries a 51st percentile aggregate GPU score, but its modern feature set — DirectX 12 Ultimate support, Vulkan 1.4, and 16 GB of VRAM — makes it well-suited to a 2018-era survival title even when the database's blended averages suggest mid-pack standing. The ranking says this combo beats roughly two-thirds of tested systems in Rust. The per-resolution data says the same thing in practical terms: flawless at 1080p, strong at 1440p, and viable-but-compromised at 4K. For a pairing built around a quad-core launch MSRP of $97 CPU and a $499 launch MSRP GPU, that is a thoroughly capable Rust machine within its resolution limits.