Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
278 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
124 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
198 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
85 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
50 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 75,779
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 50 66 79 117
1440p QHD 85 112 133 198
1080p Full HD 124 163 193 278

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 163
1920x1080 Low 278
1920x1080 Medium 193
1920x1080 Ultra 124
2560x1440 High 112
2560x1440 Low 198
2560x1440 Medium 133
2560x1440 Ultra 85
3840x2160 High 66
3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 79
3840x2160 Ultra 50

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers a compelling Rust experience, with measured results showing that the system is capable of high-refresh-rate play at 1080p and 1440p, while still managing a solid 60+ FPS experience at 4K with the right settings. The data indicates a versatile pairing where the powerful CPU and GPU each have distinct roles depending on the resolution and quality preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination in Rust covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a clear picture of performance scaling.

At 1920x1080, the system shows exceptional headroom. The Low preset produces an average of 278 FPS, while Medium averages 193 FPS with a minimum of 164 and a maximum of 222. The High preset averages 163 FPS, and the most demanding Ultra preset still averages 124 FPS. This resolution is clearly where the hardware shines, with all presets far exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but the scaling is evident. The Low preset averages 198 FPS, Medium averages 133 FPS with a minimum of 113 and a maximum of 153. The High preset delivers 112 FPS on average, and Ultra drops to an average of 85 FPS. Even at the most demanding preset, the system maintains a comfortable margin above the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the data shows a more pronounced impact of resolution. The Low preset averages 117 FPS, while Medium averages 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 90. The High preset averages 66 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold with an average of 50 FPS. This makes 4K the most challenging scenario for this hardware combination.

The FPS deltas between presets reveal interesting scaling characteristics. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 154 FPS, while at 1440p that gap narrows to 113 FPS, and at 4K it shrinks further to 67 FPS. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU and GPU have more headroom to express differences in settings, while at 4K the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor.

Best Settings per Resolution

The verdict data identifies the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for each resolution.

For 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra with an average of 124 FPS. This is a strong result, indicating that players can max out the game at this resolution and still enjoy a smooth experience well above the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 85 FPS. This shows that the system has enough performance headroom at 1440p to run the game at its highest quality preset while maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

For 3840x2160, the best settings are High with an average of 66 FPS. This is a notable finding: at 4K, the system cannot sustain 60 FPS on Ultra, but High delivers a playable experience. The Medium preset at 4K averages 79 FPS, which is also above the threshold, but High is the most demanding preset that qualifies. The data shows that 4K Ultra is the only configuration that fails to meet the playable threshold.

The FPS margins at the best settings vary by resolution. At 1080p Ultra, the system has 64 FPS of headroom above the threshold. At 1440p Ultra, that headroom is 25 FPS. At 4K High, the headroom is just 6 FPS, indicating a closer call at the highest resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals which component matters more for Rust at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the CPU likely plays a more significant role given the extremely high FPS numbers. The Low preset at 278 FPS and Ultra at 124 FPS show a massive spread, suggesting that both CPU and GPU have plenty of resources. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D's high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42018 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 70255, supports the idea that the CPU can feed frames quickly at lower resolutions.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts somewhat toward the GPU. The FPS values are lower than at 1080p, but the system still maintains high averages. The RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth likely become more relevant as the pixel count increases. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 34457 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6567 indicate strong rasterization performance.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The drop from 117 FPS on Low to 50 FPS on Ultra demonstrates that the RTX 4080 is being pushed hard at this resolution. The 4K Ultra preset falling below 60 FPS suggests that the GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while substantial, is not sufficient for max settings at this resolution. The CPU, by contrast, appears to have headroom at 4K given the relatively smaller FPS drop between presets compared to lower resolutions.

The scaling between resolutions provides further insight. Comparing the Low preset across resolutions: 278 FPS at 1080p drops to 198 FPS at 1440p (a 28.8% reduction) and then to 117 FPS at 4K (a 40.9% reduction from 1440p). This steep decline at 4K reinforces that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The Medium preset shows a similar pattern: 193 FPS at 1080p, 133 FPS at 1440p, and 79 FPS at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for this hardware pairing in Rust is 165 out of 3723 tested combinations. This places the system in the top 4.4% of all tested configurations, indicating strong overall performance for this game.

This ranking is notable given the specific hardware choices. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 4080 is at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a high-end GPU results in a system that performs well above the median for Rust.

The rank of 165 suggests that there are 164 configurations that perform better, likely featuring even more powerful GPUs such as the RTX 4090 or potentially newer generations. However, within the context of the CPU and GPU pairing, this system delivers strong results. The data shows that the combination is well-balanced for Rust, with the CPU's high single-threaded performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1292, Geekbench single-core score of 3064) complementing the GPU's rasterization capabilities.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly in this system.

For the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, the closest alternatives are:

  • AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755: average benchmark score 75738, just 0.1% behind
  • AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D: average benchmark score 75716, 0.1% behind
  • AMD EPYC 8224P: average benchmark score 75582, 0.3% behind
  • Intel Core Ultra 9 285: average benchmark score 75488, 0.4% behind

These CPUs are all within 0.4% of the 9950X3D's average benchmark score of 75779, suggesting that swapping to any of these would result in nearly identical Rust performance. The Ryzen 7 PRO options are particularly interesting as they are also AMD processors with similar architectural characteristics.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, the nearest rivals are:

  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER: average benchmark score 54209, 0.1% ahead
  • AMD Radeon Pro W5700X: average benchmark score 54828, 1.1% ahead
  • AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB: average benchmark score 55698, 2.6% ahead
  • AMD Radeon 8060S: average benchmark score 55757, 2.7% ahead

The RTX 4080 SUPER is the most direct alternative, with performance nearly identical to the RTX 4080. The AMD options show slightly higher average scores, but the deltas are small enough that real-world Rust performance would be very similar. The fact that the RTX 4080's average benchmark score is 54247 places it in a tight cluster with these alternatives.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but not at all settings. The data shows that at 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 117 FPS, Medium averages 79 FPS, and High averages 66 FPS, all above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset averages 50 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset is the best option at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 85 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at this resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: The combination ranks 165 out of 3723 tested configurations in Rust, placing it in the top 4.4% of all tested systems. The CPU is at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Rust at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU appears to play a more significant role given the very high FPS values. The Low preset reaches 278 FPS, and the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's strong multi-threaded performance supports the CPU's ability to drive high frame rates at lower resolutions.

Q: What GPU would perform similarly to the RTX 4080?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest equivalent, with an average benchmark score just 0.1% higher. AMD options like the Radeon Pro W5700X, RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, and Radeon 8060S are also within 2.7% in average benchmark scores.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS on Ultra at 1080p?

A: Yes, the Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 124 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS threshold. This indicates the system has significant headroom for max settings at this resolution.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust effectively across all tested resolutions, with the verdict data confirming playable performance in most configurations.

At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all four settings presets, with Ultra averaging 124 FPS. This is the resolution where the hardware has the most headroom, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.

At 2560x1440, all presets also stay above 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 85 FPS. This makes 1440p an excellent sweet spot for this combination, offering a balance of visual quality and performance.

At 3840x2160, the system is playable on Low, Medium, and High presets, with High averaging 66 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 50 FPS, so players seeking maximum quality at 4K would need to reduce to High settings. The data indicates that this system is capable of a solid 4K experience, but with some compromises at the highest quality settings.

Overall, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination proves to be a strong performer for Rust, with the data showing that it can handle the game at high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, while still delivering a playable experience at 4K. The system's rank of 165 out of 3723 tested combos underscores its position as a high-end gaming configuration.