Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

52%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
69 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
30 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
48 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
20 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
28 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
12 FPS
25.6ms Frame Time
38ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 75,779
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 1,184

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 12 16 19 28
1440p QHD 20 27 32 48
1080p Full HD 30 39 46 69

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 39
1920x1080 Low 69
1920x1080 Medium 46
1920x1080 Ultra 30
2560x1440 High 27
2560x1440 Low 48
2560x1440 Medium 32
2560x1440 Ultra 20
3840x2160 High 16
3840x2160 Low 28
3840x2160 Medium 19
3840x2160 Ultra 12

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

Rust, the 2018 survival game, is notoriously demanding on both CPU and GPU, but this particular pairing is lopsided. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) at TSMC's 4 nm node, ranking in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated GPU based on Xe3-LPG architecture at Intel's 3 nm node, ranking in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. The measured frame rates reflect that imbalance: only one preset at 1920x1080 reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset comes close to 60 FPS. The best average is 28 FPS at Low settings. Medium averages 19 FPS (min 16, max 22), High averages 16 FPS, and Ultra averages 12 FPS. Since every preset falls well short of the 60 FPS playable threshold, there is no recommended setting at 4K.

At 2560x1440, the situation is similar. Low averages 48 FPS, Medium averages 32 FPS (min 27, max 37), High averages 27 FPS, and Ultra averages 20 FPS. None reach 60 FPS, so no playable setting exists at 1440p.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset is the only one that clears the threshold, averaging 69 FPS. Medium averages 46 FPS (min 39, max 53), High averages 39 FPS, and Ultra averages 30 FPS. Low is therefore the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, and the only playable option at this resolution. The gap between Low and Medium at 1080p, from 69 to 46 FPS, shows how quickly the GPU becomes overwhelmed as rendering quality increases.

CPU and GPU Roles

The Ryzen 9 9950X3D brings flagship specifications: 16 cores, 32 threads, a base clock of 4.30 GHz, a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, a 170 W TDP, and 128 MB of L3 cache. Its launch MSRP is $699. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and it connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes. Its average benchmark score of 75779 places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42018 and a singlecore score of 2259.

The Arc B370, by contrast, is an integrated GPU with 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. It has a 25 W TDP and a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s and FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS. Its average benchmark score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs.

The recorded data shows that the GPU is the binding constraint. At Low settings, the game runs at 69 FPS at 1080p, 48 FPS at 1440p, and 28 FPS at 4K. The steep decline with each resolution step is the signature of a GPU-bound workload. Within a resolution, raising the preset has a similar effect. At 1080p, the average goes from 69 FPS at Low to 46 FPS at Medium, then 39 FPS at High, and 30 FPS at Ultra. At 1440p, the spread is 48 to 32 to 27 to 20. At 4K, it is 28 to 19 to 16 to 12. These consistent drops track the GPU's rendering load, not CPU capability.

The CPU's headroom is evident from its benchmark standing. A 95th percentile CPU paired with a 5th percentile GPU means the processor is effectively waiting on graphics work. Any attempt to improve frame rates would require a stronger GPU; swapping the CPU would change nothing in this configuration.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured averages are: Low 69 FPS, Medium 46 FPS (min 39, max 53), High 39 FPS, and Ultra 30 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low 48 FPS, Medium 32 FPS (min 27, max 37), High 27 FPS, and Ultra 20 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low 28 FPS, Medium 19 FPS (min 16, max 22), High 16 FPS, and Ultra 12 FPS.

Min and max values are only recorded for the Medium preset at each resolution. The 1080p Medium range of 39 to 53 FPS shows that even the best-case frame time stays below the 60 FPS threshold, and the 4K Medium range of 16 to 22 FPS demonstrates how far this GPU is from playable at high pixel counts. The 1440p Medium range of 27 to 37 FPS sits between those two extremes, consistent with the resolution scaling seen across all presets.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database's measured combinations, this pairing ranks 3437th out of 3723. That places it in the lowest portion of the field, consistent with the GPU's 5th percentile standing. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking does not rescue the overall result, because Rust's frame rate in this configuration is dictated entirely by the GPU. The rank reflects the combined system performance, and the GPU drags the pairing down to the bottom of the distribution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, are all within a fraction of a percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 is 0.1% higher, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D is 0.1% higher, the AMD EPYC 8224P is 0.3% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is 0.4% higher. Swapping the 9950X3D for any of these would produce essentially identical CPU-side behavior in Rust.

The GPU's nearest rivals are similarly close. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2% lower in average score, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% lower, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% lower, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% higher. None of these would meaningfully change the measured frame rates in this game.

For a system builder looking at the recorded data, the CPU can be swapped among these near-identical alternatives without affecting the outcome. The GPU, however, has no nearby alternative that would push Rust past the 60 FPS threshold at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Rust at 60 FPS?

A: Only at 1920x1080 with the Low preset, which averages 69 FPS. All other tested presets and resolutions fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: There is none. The highest average at 2560x1440 is 48 FPS at Low, below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How much faster is the CPU compared to the GPU in percentile terms?

A: The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 5th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Which components are closest in performance to the CPU in this pairing?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D are both within 0.1% of the 9950X3D's average benchmark score, followed by the AMD EPYC 8224P at 0.3% and Intel Core Ultra 9 285 at 0.4%.

Q: Which GPUs are closest to the Arc B370 in performance?

A: The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is 0.2% lower, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 is 0.5% lower, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% lower, and the AMD FirePro M2000 is 1.4% higher.

Q: What rank does this combination hold in the database?

A: It ranks 3437th out of 3723 tested combinations.