Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
274 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
150 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
239 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
103 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
5.1ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 57,498
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 77,712

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 80 95 141
1440p QHD 103 136 161 239
1080p Full HD 150 197 233 274

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 197
1920x1080 Low 274
1920x1080 Medium 233
1920x1080 Ultra 150
2560x1440 High 136
2560x1440 Low 239
2560x1440 Medium 161
2560x1440 Ultra 103
3840x2160 High 80
3840x2160 Low 141
3840x2160 Medium 95
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Rust across all tested resolutions. The data shows that this pairing is capable of running the game at its Ultra preset with average FPS well above the 60 FPS playable threshold at 1080p, 1440p, and even 4K, making it a top-tier choice for demanding survival gameplay.

Best Settings per Resolution

The benchmark data identifies the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution. The verdict is straightforward: this combo can handle the maximum Ultra settings everywhere.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the best settings are Ultra, delivering an average of 61 FPS. This is the only resolution where the Ultra preset sits close to the playable threshold, indicating that 4K Ultra is playable but leaves little headroom for dips. The High preset at this resolution averages 80 FPS, which is a safer choice for sustained performance, but the data confirms Ultra is technically viable.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the best settings are Ultra, with an average of 103 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, making it the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors. The step down to High yields 136 FPS average, which would suit 144Hz displays, but Ultra remains well within playable territory.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the best settings are Ultra, producing an average of 150 FPS. This is the strongest result, offering more than double the 60 FPS threshold. The performance headroom here is substantial, allowing for maximum visual quality without compromising smoothness.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings shows an average of 61 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict by resolution lists Ultra as playable at 4K.

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 161, with a minimum of 136 and a maximum of 185. This represents a strong balance of visual fidelity and performance.

Q: How does the combo perform at 1080p with Low settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 274, which is the highest figure recorded across all tested settings and resolutions. This suggests the CPU and GPU are far from being stressed at lower graphical loads.

Q: Is the Ultra preset at 4K smooth, or is it borderline?

A: The 4K Ultra result averages 61 FPS, which is just 1 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold. While playable, the data shows minimal headroom, so the High preset at 80 FPS may be preferable for consistent frame pacing.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The minimum FPS at 2560x1440 Medium is 136. This indicates that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays well above the playable threshold, providing a stable experience.

Q: Does the game run at over 200 FPS at any setting?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average is 233 FPS, and with Low settings it reaches 274 FPS. At 2560x1440 Low, the average is 239 FPS. These figures highlight the extreme performance ceiling of this hardware combination.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data provides context for both the CPU and GPU, showing which other components would deliver comparable aggregate benchmark performance.

For the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, the closest rivals in average benchmark score are the AMD EPYC 9015 (57555 score, -0.1% delta), AMD EPYC 7313 (57399 score, +0.2% delta), Intel Core i9-14900 (58115 score, -1.1% delta), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58323 score, -1.4% delta). The delta percentages are all within 1.4% of the 9900X's score, meaning these processors would produce near-identical CPU-bound performance in Rust. The Intel Core i9-14900 is the most relevant consumer alternative, while the EPYC and Xeon options are server-class parts that would behave similarly in synthetic benchmarks but may differ in gaming-specific workloads.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (76904 score, +1.1% delta), AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78940 score, -1.6% delta), NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79396 score, -2.1% delta), and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79605 score, -2.4% delta). These deltas are also small, within 2.4%, indicating that these GPUs would produce similar aggregate benchmark scores. However, the RX 6650M XT and RX 6850M XT are mobile parts, and the Tesla P100 cards are datacenter accelerators without display outputs, so they are not direct drop-in alternatives for a gaming PC. The practical takeaway is that the RTX 5090 D's performance level is matched by a narrow band of hardware, but the consumer desktop alternatives are limited.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: this PC can run Rust with high performance at every resolution tested. The verdictByResolution field confirms that all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080.

At 4K, the best playable setting is Ultra with a 61 FPS average. This is a pass, but it is the only configuration where the combo dips close to the 60 FPS line. Players who prioritize frame consistency over absolute visual quality may prefer High at 80 FPS average.

At 1440p, the best setting is Ultra with 103 FPS average. This provides a strong balance of image quality and smoothness, making it the recommended resolution for this pairing. The margin above 60 FPS is substantial, and even the minimum FPS at Medium (136) stays far above the threshold.

At 1080p, the best setting is Ultra with 150 FPS average. This is the most comfortable scenario, with more than double the playable threshold. The data indicates that the CPU and GPU are not bottlenecked at this resolution, as even the Low preset reaches 274 FPS average.

The overall verdict is that this combo is overqualified for Rust at 1080p and 1440p, and it is still fully capable at 4K. Rust's demanding rendering of large open-world environments does not present a significant challenge to the Ryzen 9 9900X and RTX 5090 D combination, based on the measured results.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measuredFps data provides a detailed view of performance across each resolution and settings preset. The table below summarizes the average FPS, with minimum and maximum values where recorded.

At 3840x2160, the results are:

  • Low: 141 FPS average
  • Medium: 95 FPS average, with a minimum of 81 and maximum of 109
  • High: 80 FPS average
  • Ultra: 61 FPS average

The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a predictable drop of 80 FPS from the lowest to the highest preset. The Medium preset's recorded range of 81-109 FPS indicates that frame times stay consistent, without severe dips.

At 2560x1440, the results are:

  • Low: 239 FPS average
  • Medium: 161 FPS average, with a minimum of 136 and maximum of 185
  • High: 136 FPS average
  • Ultra: 103 FPS average

The jump from Low to Medium is significant, dropping 78 FPS, but the Medium preset still holds a minimum of 136 FPS. The Ultra preset at 103 FPS average is the standout figure, showing that max settings remain highly playable.

At 1920x1080, the results are:

  • Low: 274 FPS average
  • Medium: 233 FPS average, with a minimum of 198 and maximum of 268
  • High: 197 FPS average
  • Ultra: 150 FPS average

This is the strongest showing. Even at Ultra, the average of 150 FPS is more than double the playable threshold. The Medium preset's minimum of 198 FPS means that no recorded frame drops below 198 FPS, which is exceptional for a survival game with dynamic environments.

The data pattern across resolutions shows that the RTX 5090 D's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom, as the frame rates scale almost linearly with resolution changes. The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads also appear sufficient to feed the GPU at all tested settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame field places this pairing at rank 13 out of 3723 tested combinations in Rust. This means the Ryzen 9 9900X + RTX 5090 D setup is in the top 0.3% of all tested hardware configurations for this game, based on the benchmark database.

This high ranking is consistent with the measured FPS results. The combo achieves 150 FPS at 1080p Ultra, 103 FPS at 1440p Ultra, and 61 FPS at 4K Ultra, all of which clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. The rank of 13 suggests that only a handful of other combinations out of the 3723 tested produce higher aggregate performance in Rust.

The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 92 and the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 92 further contextualize the hardware. Both components sit in the 92nd percentile of their respective categories, indicating that they outperform 92% of all CPUs and GPUs in the database. When paired, their combined performance in Rust places them near the very top of the rankings.

The nearestRivals data for both components shows that the performance gap to the next-best alternatives is minimal in synthetic benchmarks, but the actual in-game ranking at 13 out of 3723 demonstrates that this specific pairing is particularly well-suited to Rust. The high average FPS across all settings and resolutions, combined with the strong minimum FPS figures, suggests that the combo delivers both high peak performance and consistent frame delivery, which is critical for a survival game where sudden action can occur in large player-built environments.