Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
248 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
130 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
211 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
93 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
126 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
52 FPS
5.7ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 53,288
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 73 83 126
1440p QHD 93 120 143 211
1080p Full HD 130 174 205 248

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 174
1920x1080 Low 248
1920x1080 Medium 205
1920x1080 Ultra 130
2560x1440 High 120
2560x1440 Low 211
2560x1440 Medium 143
2560x1440 Ultra 93
3840x2160 High 73
3840x2160 Low 126
3840x2160 Medium 83
3840x2160 Ultra 52

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

This PC combination delivers strong performance in Rust, but the experience varies significantly across resolutions. At 4K, the system is playable at High settings, while at 1440p and 1080p, it pushes well beyond the 60 FPS threshold even at maximum quality. The data indicates a capable pairing where the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU holds its own even at lower settings.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, with a measured average of 72.8 FPS. The Medium preset runs at 82.7 FPS and Low at 126.1 FPS, but High represents the sweet spot for visual fidelity without dropping below the playable threshold. The Ultra preset falls short of 60 FPS at 52.4 FPS, so it is not recommended at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the system achieves playable performance across all presets. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 93 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the best visual experience. High runs at 120.1 FPS, Medium at 143.1 FPS, and Low at 211.1 FPS. The Ultra setting is the clear choice here, as it offers the highest quality while still maintaining a comfortable margin above the threshold.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset runs at 129.6 FPS, making it the best setting available. Lower presets provide even higher frame rates, with High at 174.2 FPS, Medium at 205.4 FPS, and Low at 248.1 FPS, but there is no need to compromise on quality at this resolution. The system has ample headroom to max out the game.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how the workload shifts between the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is 118.5 FPS (from 248.1 to 129.6), indicating that the GPU is handling most of the rendering load, but the CPU is not bottlenecking. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 51406, supports high frame rates even at lower settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 118.1 FPS (211.1 to 93). This suggests that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as resolution increases, but the CPU still provides enough headroom to avoid being the primary constraint. The Ryzen 9 7900X’s single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2617 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1093, ensures that the game’s simulation and physics threads are well-served.

At 3840x2160, the difference between Low and Ultra shrinks to 73.7 FPS (126.1 to 52.4). Here, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor, as the RTX 5080’s rendering capabilities are stretched by the higher pixel count. The CPU’s influence diminishes, but its performance remains sufficient to avoid bottlenecking even at Ultra settings. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU share the load more evenly, while at 4K, the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has an average benchmark score of 53288, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7313P with a score of 53206 and a delta of 0.2%, meaning the EPYC is essentially tied in performance. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, which is 0.3% higher, and the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974, which is 0.6% lower. The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620, which is 0.6% higher, making it the closest competitor in terms of raw compute. These alternatives would behave similarly in Rust, though the gaming-specific performance may vary slightly based on architecture.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083, placing it at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S with a score of 55757 and a delta of 0.6%, indicating near-identical performance. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, which is 0.7% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 2.3% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57367, which is 2.2% higher, making it a slightly faster alternative. In Rust, these GPUs would produce similar frame rates at the same settings and resolutions, with the RX 9070 GRE offering a marginal advantage.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust effectively at all tested resolutions, but with different quality ceilings. At 3840x2160, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at High, Medium, and Low settings, with High providing the best balance of quality and performance at 72.8 FPS. The Ultra preset is not playable at this resolution, falling to 52.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are playable, and Ultra delivers 93 FPS, which is a strong result for a demanding survival game. At 1920x1080, the system exceeds 60 FPS on all presets, with Ultra running at 129.6 FPS, providing a smooth experience even in the most graphically intensive scenes.

The verdict is clear: the combination of the Ryzen 9 7900X and RTX 5080 is more than sufficient for Rust at 1080p and 1440p, and it handles 4K at High settings without issue. The only caveat is that 4K Ultra is not achievable at playable frame rates, but the step down to High is a minor visual compromise for a significant performance gain.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields an average of 248.1 FPS, Medium runs at 205.4 FPS, High at 174.2 FPS, and Ultra at 129.6 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is consistent, with each step down in quality providing a noticeable boost in frame rate. The difference between Low and Medium is 42.7 FPS, between Medium and High is 31.2 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 44.6 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset carries a significant performance cost.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 211.1 FPS, Medium runs at 143.1 FPS, High at 120.1 FPS, and Ultra at 93 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 68 FPS, which is larger than the 42.7 FPS difference at 1080p, showing that the GPU is working harder at this resolution. The difference between Medium and High is 23 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 27.1 FPS, with the Ultra preset again being the most demanding.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 126.1 FPS, Medium runs at 82.7 FPS, High at 72.8 FPS, and Ultra at 52.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 43.4 FPS, between Medium and High is 9.9 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 20.4 FPS. The smaller gap between Medium and High at 4K suggests that the GPU is hitting a performance ceiling, with the Ultra preset being the first to drop below 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination ranks 111th out of 3723 tested combos for Rust, placing it in the top 3% of all configurations. This is a strong result, reflecting the high performance of both components. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and the GPU’s 87th percentile ranking contribute to this overall position, though the specific game workload in Rust appears to favor the CPU more than the GPU, given the relatively high frame rates at lower resolutions.

The rank of 111 out of 3723 indicates that most other combinations tested are less capable for this game, but there is still a significant number of faster setups. The data suggests that this combo is well-suited for competitive play, where high and consistent frame rates are essential, and it should handle Rust’s demanding environments without issue. The performance gap between this combo and the top-ranked systems is likely due to more powerful GPUs or CPUs with higher single-thread performance, but the margin is not substantial enough to impact playability at any resolution below 4K Ultra.