Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Rust
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 35 | 41 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 45 | 59 | 70 | 104 |
| 1080p Full HD | 65 | 86 | 102 | 151 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 presents a distinct performance profile for Rust, a survival title with demanding system requirements. This analysis examines the measured frame rate data for this combination, focusing on playability across common resolutions and settings. The data indicates that this system is highly capable at 1080p, offering playable performance even at the highest settings, while 1440p remains solid and 4K requires compromises.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The benchmark data places this specific hardware pairing within a broader ecosystem of comparable components. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X achieves an average benchmark score of 53,288, placing it in the 91st percentile of all tested processors. Its closest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7313P, which scores 53,206 (a 0.2% delta), and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, scoring 53,469 (a -0.3% delta). The Intel Xeon 634 scores 52,974 (0.6% higher), while the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53,620 (-0.6% lower). These four processors represent the nearest performance envelope, meaning systems built with any of these CPUs would exhibit near-identical CPU-bound behavior in Rust. The Ryzen 9 7900X itself features 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, making it a high-end desktop part.
On the graphics side, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 records an average benchmark score of 16,014, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 16,129 (a -0.7% delta), and the AMD Radeon R9 370X, scoring 15,862 (a 1% delta). The AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15,852 (1% higher), while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15,679 (2.1% higher). For practical purposes, a system with an RTX 3060 Ti or an RX 7700 would deliver frame rates within a very narrow margin of those measured for this RX 9060 configuration. The RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
When considering a full system replacement, a user seeking similar Rust performance could opt for any of these rival CPUs or GPUs in combination, as the deltas are all under 2.1%. The data suggests that the CPU is a top-tier part, while the GPU is a mid-range performer, so the overall bottleneck in this pairing will typically be the graphics card.
Best Settings per Resolution
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS at each resolution.
At 3840x2160 (4K), the only playable setting is Low. The data shows an average of 62 FPS at Low settings, which just clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings drop to 41 FPS, High to 35 FPS, and Ultra to 27 FPS, all of which are below the playable threshold. Therefore, the best settings for 4K are Low, yielding an average of 62 FPS.
At 2560x1440 (1440p), the playable settings are Low and Medium. Low settings produce an average of 104 FPS, while Medium produces 70 FPS. High settings dip to 59 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra falls to 45 FPS. The best settings for 1440p are Medium, with an average of 70 FPS, as this is the highest quality preset that remains playable.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), all four settings are playable. Low averages 151 FPS, Medium averages 102 FPS, High averages 86 FPS, and Ultra averages 65 FPS. The best settings for 1080p are Ultra, with an average of 65 FPS, proving the system can run the game at maximum quality while still exceeding the 60 FPS target.
These results show a predictable scaling of performance with resolution and settings. The system is fully capable at 1080p, offers a good experience at 1440p with a slight compromise, and is limited to the lowest settings at 4K.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals how the CPU and GPU workloads shift across resolutions and presets. At 1080p, the high frame rates — 151 FPS on Low — suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to achieve such numbers. The Ryzen 9 7900X, with its high single-thread score of 2,016.5 in Cinebench R23, is well-suited for this task. As the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the frame rates drop significantly (e.g., from 151 FPS at 1080p Low to 104 FPS at 1440p Low to 62 FPS at 4K Low), which is a classic indication that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as pixel count rises.
The scaling between presets at the same resolution further illustrates this. At 1080p, moving from Low (151 FPS) to Ultra (65 FPS) represents a 56.9% drop in performance, which is a substantial hit driven by the increased graphical load on the GPU. At 1440p, the drop from Low (104 FPS) to Ultra (45 FPS) is a 56.7% decrease, and at 4K, from Low (62 FPS) to Ultra (27 FPS) is a 56.4% decrease. This consistent percentage drop across resolutions indicates that the GPU's processing capacity is the primary constraint when settings are increased.
The CPU's role becomes more pronounced at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 151 FPS, a figure that demands strong per-core performance from the processor. The Ryzen 9 7900X's single-thread benchmark scores (e.g., 4,238 in Passmark single-thread) support this capability. However, the data shows that at 4K, even at Low settings, the system only reaches 62 FPS, which is close to the 60 FPS threshold. This suggests that the GPU is heavily taxed at this resolution, and the CPU's potential is not fully utilized. The overall picture is that the RX 9060 is the bottleneck for this pairing in Rust, particularly at higher resolutions and quality presets. The CPU is more than sufficient to handle the game's logic and draw calls, but the GPU's 8 GB memory capacity and compute throughput limit the visual fidelity and resolution the system can handle.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the measured average FPS is 65, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.
Q: What is the highest quality setting that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 70 FPS, making it the highest quality preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. High settings drop to 59 FPS, which falls below the threshold.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Only at the lowest settings. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average FPS is 62, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra presets all yield averages below 60 FPS (41, 35, and 27 FPS respectively).
Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 3060 Ti?
A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16,014, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16,129. This represents a -0.7% delta, meaning the RTX 3060 Ti is nominally faster, but the difference is negligible in real-world performance.
Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more in Rust?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary limiter. As resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, frame rates drop significantly (e.g., from 151 FPS to 62 FPS at Low settings), which is characteristic of a GPU bottleneck. The CPU's high single-thread performance allows for high frame rates at lower settings, but the GPU cannot maintain those rates at higher resolutions.
Q: What is the expected frame rate at 1440p with High settings?
A: The measured average FPS is 59, which is just below the 60 FPS playability threshold. While it is very close to playable, it does not meet the strict 60 FPS criterion defined for this analysis.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table details the exact measured average, minimum, and maximum frame rates for each resolution and settings preset. Note that minimum and maximum values are only provided for Medium settings; other presets only have average values in the data.
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |
| :--------- | :------- | :------ | :------ | :------ |
| 3840x2160 | High | 35 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 62 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41 | 35 | 47 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 27 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | High | 59 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 104 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 70 | 59 | 80 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 45 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | High | 86 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 151 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 102 | 86 | 117 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 65 | - | - |
The data shows a clear progression. At 1080p, the system delivers smooth performance across all presets. The Medium preset at 1080p shows a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS, indicating stable frame times. At 1440p, the Medium preset maintains a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 80 FPS, which is still a playable experience. At 4K, the Medium preset drops to an average of 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 FPS, which is not playable. These numbers confirm that the system is best suited for 1080p gaming, with 1440p being a viable alternative when settings are kept to Medium or lower.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 2190th out of 3723 tested combinations for Rust. This places the system in the upper 41.2% of all configurations in the database. Given that the CPU is a top-tier part (91st percentile) and the GPU is a mid-range part (59th percentile), this ranking reflects the GPU's limiting role. The system outperforms a majority of combinations, but it is far from the top of the charts. For context, the CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700F, would likely produce a similar ranking when paired with a GPU in the same performance class. The ranking suggests that while this is a capable system, users seeking higher frame rates at 4K or maximum settings would need to consider a more powerful GPU.
The Verdict
The data clearly answers the question of whether this PC can run Rust.
At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable across all settings. The verdict data lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable, with the best settings being Ultra at 65 FPS. This is the optimal resolution for this hardware.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable, but with a compromise. The playable settings are Low and Medium, with the best being Medium at 70 FPS. High settings barely miss the 60 FPS target at 59 FPS, so users should stick to Medium for a consistent experience.
At 3840x2160, the system is only playable at Low settings, achieving 62 FPS. This is a marginal pass, and any increase in settings (Medium at 41 FPS, High at 35 FPS, Ultra at 27 FPS) results in a non-playable experience.
In summary, this combination is a strong 1080p gaming machine for Rust, offering a high-refresh-rate experience at lower settings and a smooth 65 FPS at Ultra. It is a capable 1440p machine when settings are kept to Medium. At 4K, it is only marginally playable at the lowest settings. The Ryzen 9 7900X provides ample CPU performance, but the RX 9060's 8 GB memory and mid-range compute power define the system's overall limits. For a player with a 1080p or 1440p monitor, this setup provides a solid, playable experience in Rust.