Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
203 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
149 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
179 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
103 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
6.1ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 41,376
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 77,712

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 80 95 141
1440p QHD 103 136 154 179
1080p Full HD 149 164 175 203

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 164
1920x1080 Low 203
1920x1080 Medium 175
1920x1080 Ultra 149
2560x1440 High 136
2560x1440 Low 179
2560x1440 Medium 154
2560x1440 Ultra 103
3840x2160 High 80
3840x2160 Low 141
3840x2160 Medium 95
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D delivers a dominant Rust experience, clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold at every tested resolution and preset. The data shows no compromises: from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, the system maintains frame rates well above the playability line, with the most demanding Ultra preset still averaging 61 FPS at 4K. This is a top-tier pairing for Rust, ranking 131st out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the 96.5th percentile of all tested configs.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional headroom: Low settings average 203 FPS, Medium averages 175 FPS with a minimum of 148 FPS and maximum of 201 FPS, High averages 164 FPS, and Ultra averages 149 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 54 FPS, indicating that even the heaviest preset at 1080p leaves massive performance on the table.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain extremely high. Low settings push to 179 FPS average, Medium drops to 154 FPS with a range of 131 to 177 FPS, High settles at 136 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 103 FPS. The resolution jump from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 24 FPS on Low, 21 FPS on Medium, 28 FPS on High, and 46 FPS on Ultra — a predictable degradation that keeps every preset comfortably above 100 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system finally shows measurable strain, though it never approaches the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings average 141 FPS, Medium averages 95 FPS with a minimum of 81 FPS and maximum of 109 FPS, High drops to 80 FPS, and Ultra averages 61 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only data point that falls below 80 FPS, but it still clears the playability threshold with a 1 FPS margin. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep: Low loses 38 FPS, Medium loses 59 FPS, High loses 56 FPS, and Ultra loses 42 FPS.

Notably, the Medium preset at each resolution is the only setting with recorded minimum and maximum frame rates. At 1080p Medium, the minimum of 148 FPS indicates strong frame pacing, while the 148-to-201 FPS range shows a 53 FPS delta. At 1440p Medium, the 131-to-177 FPS range spans 46 FPS. At 4K Medium, the 81-to-109 FPS range spans 28 FPS, suggesting tighter frame delivery at higher resolutions as the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best playable setting is Ultra, which averages 149 FPS. This preset represents the maximum visual quality while still delivering over double the 60 FPS threshold. The system could theoretically run higher, but Ultra is the ceiling of the tested settings.

At 2560x1440, Ultra again qualifies as the best setting, averaging 103 FPS. This is a 46 FPS reduction from the 1080p Ultra result, but the frame rate remains far above playability, making maxed-out visuals the clear choice at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 61 FPS, which barely clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the only resolution where the best setting sits close to the playability line. High averages 80 FPS, offering a 19 FPS safety margin over Ultra, while Medium averages 95 FPS and Low averages 141 FPS. For 4K gaming, Ultra is technically playable but leaves minimal headroom; High provides a more comfortable buffer while still delivering strong visual quality.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU benchmarks place the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at an average score of 41376, with a percentile ranking of 87 against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show extremely tight clustering: the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41263, a delta of 0.3 percent; the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H scores 41215, a delta of 0.4 percent; the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 41208, a delta of 0.4 percent; and the Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41576, a delta of -0.5 percent. These rivals are within a half-percent of the Ryzen 9 5900X, meaning any of these processors would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Rust.

The GPU benchmarks show the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D averaging 77712, ranking in the 92nd percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals cluster within a few percent: the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT scores 76904, a delta of 1.1 percent; the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940, a delta of -1.6 percent; the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79396, a delta of -2.1 percent; and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79605, a delta of -2.4 percent. The RX 6650M XT would deliver nearly identical GPU throughput, while the RX 6850M XT and Tesla P100 variants sit slightly above.

For a full-system comparison, pairing the Ryzen 9 5900X with an AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT would produce results within roughly one percent of this configuration. The Intel Core i7-14650HX paired with an RX 6850M XT would also track closely, with the CPU slightly ahead and the GPU slightly behind, creating a similar overall balance. Any of these rival combinations would behave like the tested setup in Rust, though the RTX 5090 D's 32 GB memory capacity and Blackwell architecture provide headroom that the rival GPUs lack.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust at every tested resolution and preset, with all twelve measured configurations clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 1920x1080, the system delivers between 149 FPS on Ultra and 203 FPS on Low, making it vastly overqualified for smooth gameplay. At 2560x1440, results range from 103 FPS on Ultra to 179 FPS on Low, again far exceeding requirements.

At 3840x2160, the verdict changes slightly. Ultra averages 61 FPS, which clears the threshold but leaves only a single frame of headroom. High averages 80 FPS, providing a more comfortable margin. Medium averages 95 FPS, and Low averages 141 FPS. The verdict for 4K is that Ultra is playable but borderline; High is the recommended choice for sustained performance with minimal visual compromise.

The verdict across all resolutions is unambiguous: this combination never dips below 60 FPS in any tested scenario, and at 1080p and 1440p it maintains frame rates that exceed what most displays can show. The only cautionary note is 4K Ultra, where the 61 FPS average offers no buffer against transient drops.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling data reveals how the CPU and GPU split responsibilities across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system averages 203 FPS on Low and 149 FPS on Ultra, a 26.6 percent reduction from the lowest to highest preset. This relatively small delta suggests the Ryzen 9 5900X provides enough single-thread throughput to keep frame rates high even when GPU load increases.

At 2560x1440, the reduction from Low to Ultra is 42.5 percent, dropping from 179 FPS to 103 FPS. The larger penalty indicates the GPU begins to dominate as pixel count rises. At 3840x2160, the Low-to-Ultra reduction reaches 56.7 percent, falling from 141 FPS to 61 FPS. This steep curve shows the RTX 5090 D becoming the primary bottleneck at 4K, while the CPU maintains sufficient headroom.

The resolution scaling further clarifies roles. Moving from 1080p to 1440p on Ultra costs 46 FPS, while moving from 1440p to 4K on Ultra costs 42 FPS. However, on Low settings, the 1080p-to-1440p transition costs 24 FPS and the 1440p-to-4K transition costs 38 FPS. The Low preset results show a larger proportional drop at higher resolutions, indicating that even on minimal settings, the GPU's pixel throughput becomes limiting. Conversely, the CPU's influence is most visible at 1080p, where frame rates exceed 200 FPS and the Ryzen 9 5900X's single-core performance keeps pace with the GPU's output.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ranks 131st out of 3723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the top 3.5 percent of all configurations. This ranking reflects the synergy between a high-percentile CPU and a high-percentile GPU: the Ryzen 9 5900X sits in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 5090 D sits in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The 131st overall rank is slightly below what either component's individual percentile might suggest, indicating that Rust's performance ceiling is reached before this hardware's full potential is tapped.

The rank of 131 means 130 tested combinations achieve higher average frame rates in Rust. Given that the CPU and GPU both rank above the 87th percentile individually, the combos ahead of this one likely feature even more powerful processors or graphics cards, or both. However, the practical impact is minimal: this system already exceeds 60 FPS at every setting, and the 4K Ultra result of 61 FPS shows that only a small performance gap separates it from the very top tier.

The data indicates this is a near-flagship pairing for Rust. The gap between this combo and the best-performing configurations is small enough that real-world differences would be visible only at 4K Ultra, where the 61 FPS average sits just above the threshold. At lower resolutions, the system's frame rates are so high that ranking position becomes academic — the experience is smooth and responsive regardless of whether 130 other combinations score marginally higher.