Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

82%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
51 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
81 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
35 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
48 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
21 FPS
14.9ms Frame Time
22ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 41,376
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 21 27 32 48
1440p QHD 35 46 54 81
1080p Full HD 51 67 79 118

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 67
1920x1080 Low 118
1920x1080 Medium 79
1920x1080 Ultra 51
2560x1440 High 46
2560x1440 Low 81
2560x1440 Medium 54
2560x1440 Ultra 35
3840x2160 High 27
3840x2160 Low 48
3840x2160 Medium 32
3840x2160 Ultra 21

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with an Intel Arc B570 presents a specific performance profile in Rust, one that is heavily dependent on resolution and quality settings. The benchmark data shows this combo can handle the game at 1080p and 1440p with the right settings, but it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination in Rust is detailed across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are consistently below the playable threshold. With High settings, the average FPS is 27. Dropping to Medium settings yields an average of 32 FPS, with a minimum of 27 and a maximum of 37. Low settings improve the average to 48 FPS, but this still does not reach the 60 FPS playable threshold. At Ultra settings, the average falls to 21 FPS, the lowest recorded for this combo.

Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the performance becomes more viable, though still limited. The High preset delivers an average of 46 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 and a maximum of 62, showing it can briefly touch playable frame rates but not sustain them. Ultra settings drop the average to 35 FPS. The standout result at this resolution is the Low preset, which achieves an average of 81 FPS, comfortably clearing the 60 FPS threshold.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), this hardware combination shows its strongest performance. The Low preset produces an average of 118 FPS, which is the highest average recorded across all tested configurations. Medium settings deliver an average of 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91. The High preset achieves an average of 67 FPS, barely clearing the playable threshold. Ultra settings, however, bring the average down to 51 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS mark.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear shift in system bottleneck behavior as resolution changes. At 4K, the average FPS drops sharply across all presets, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor. The Intel Arc B570, which sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, is being overwhelmed by the pixel count at 3840x2160. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K shows a dramatic decline from 48 FPS to 21 FPS, a difference of 27 FPS, underscoring the GPU's inability to maintain high frame rates at this resolution.

At 1440p, the balance begins to shift. The gap between Low (81 FPS) and Medium (54 FPS) settings is significant, but the jump from Medium to High (46 FPS) and then to Ultra (35 FPS) suggests the GPU is still the primary constraint. The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, which has 12 cores and 24 threads and sits in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, is capable of feeding the GPU enough data at this resolution.

The dynamic changes at 1080p. Here, the CPU's strength becomes more apparent. The 5900X with its Zen 3 architecture and 64 MB of L3 cache can push high frame rates, as evidenced by the 118 FPS average on Low settings. The spread between Low (118 FPS) and High (67 FPS) is large, but the system is still able to hit playable averages on Medium and High. The fact that Ultra settings drop to 51 FPS indicates that even at 1080p, the GPU's limits are reached with the highest-quality textures and effects, but the CPU is clearly not holding the system back at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination is ranked 2996 out of 3723 total tested combos for Rust. This places it in the lower half of all possible pairings, reflecting its inability to handle 4K and its modest performance at higher settings. The ranking is a direct result of the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as the CPU is a high-end part that performs well in synthetic benchmarks.

The combo's ranking suggests that while it can run Rust at playable frame rates, it is far from the top-tier configurations. Many other combinations of CPUs and GPUs will deliver higher average FPS, particularly at 4K and at higher quality presets. For a game like Rust, which is demanding on both the CPU and GPU, this combo is a mid-range performer at best.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for each component provides context for what similar performance looks like. For the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, the closest CPU in average benchmark score is the Intel Core i7-14650HX, which scores 41576, a delta of -0.5% compared to the 5900X's 41376. This means the i7-14650HX is essentially a performance match. Other close rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H with a score of 41263 (a 0.3% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H with a score of 41215 (a 0.4% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 with a score of 41208 (a 0.4% delta). Any of these CPUs would behave nearly identically to the 5900X in Rust, meaning the bottleneck would remain the GPU.

For the Intel Arc B570, the nearest GPU rival is the Intel Arc A750, which has an average score of 20582, a delta of -0.1% compared to the B570's 20556. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a 0.1% delta, meaning it is also a very close match. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20480 (0.4% delta) and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (-0.5% delta) are also similar in raw compute. In practice, swapping the B570 for an Arc A750 or RTX 3070 Mobile would yield nearly identical frame rates in Rust, meaning users should expect the same 1080p and 1440p limitations.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1080p High is 67, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. The minimum FPS is not listed for this preset, but the average is sufficient for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 2560x1440?

A: The only playable setting at 1440p is Low, which achieves an average of 81 FPS. Medium settings average 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, so Low is the recommended choice for this resolution.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: No. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 48 on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. All other presets at 4K, including High (27 FPS), Medium (32 FPS), and Ultra (21 FPS), are not playable.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X has an average benchmark score of 41376. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-14650HX, scores 41576, which is 0.5% higher. Other rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H are within 0.4%, meaning performance is essentially equivalent.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a 0.1% difference, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, also a 0.1% difference. This means these GPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Rust.

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in the database?

A: This combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and Intel Arc B570 is ranked 2996 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems.

The Verdict

The data shows that this PC can run Rust, but with significant caveats depending on the resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable on High, Low, and Medium settings, with averages of 67, 118, and 79 FPS respectively. The best playable setting at this resolution is High, which delivers an average of 67 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset is playable, achieving an average of 81 FPS. At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings; the highest average is 48 FPS on Low, which falls short of the 60 FPS requirement.

For a practical gaming experience, this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming. Players can expect smooth performance on Medium and High presets, and very high frame rates on Low settings for competitive play. At 1440p, users will need to compromise on visual quality and stick to Low settings for a playable experience. 4K is not a viable option with this hardware configuration. The combination of a high-end CPU and a mid-range GPU creates a system that is CPU-limited at 1080p but GPU-limited at higher resolutions, making it a versatile but not top-tier choice for Rust.