Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
245 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
107 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
169 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
71 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
97 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
45 FPS
7.1ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 39,768
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 40,377

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 45 55 64 97
1440p QHD 71 97 110 169
1080p Full HD 107 141 161 245

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 141
1920x1080 Low 245
1920x1080 Medium 161
1920x1080 Ultra 107
2560x1440 High 97
2560x1440 Low 169
2560x1440 Medium 110
2560x1440 Ultra 71
3840x2160 High 55
3840x2160 Low 97
3840x2160 Medium 64
3840x2160 Ultra 45

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination presents a compelling picture for Rust, a survival title known for its demanding simulation and rendering loads. Measured data from the database indicates this pairing delivers a wide range of performance across common gaming resolutions, with the most demanding settings proving too heavy for 4K but easily manageable at lower resolutions. The benchmark results show a system that scales predictably, offering clear guidance on how to prioritize visual fidelity against frame rate targets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the data shows a clear hierarchy of performance across the four tested presets. The Ultra preset yields an average of 44.5 FPS, which is below the playable threshold and indicates the GPU is overtaxed by the highest visual demands. Dropping to High raises the average to 54.9 FPS, still shy of the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset crosses the playability line with an average of 63.8 FPS. The Low preset provides a substantial jump to 96.6 FPS, making it the most responsive option for 4K displays.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance envelope expands significantly. The Low preset achieves an average of 169 FPS, demonstrating the CPU's strength in less GPU-bound scenarios. Medium produces 109.8 FPS, while High renders at 97.3 FPS. The Ultra preset, which was unplayable at 4K, now delivers a solid 70.8 FPS average, comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS threshold.

At 1920x1080, the combination shows its full potential. The Low preset reaches an average of 244.9 FPS, which is exceptionally high. Medium yields 160.6 FPS, and High produces 140.9 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 106.8 FPS, proving that this resolution is well within the hardware's comfort zone for all settings. It is worth remembering the data pack provides only average frame rates, not min or max values, so variance and frame pacing cannot be assessed from this information alone.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals the shifting balance of responsibility between the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the difference between the Low preset (244.9 FPS) and Ultra (106.8 FPS) is a factor of roughly 2.3, highlighting how much the GPU is challenged by increased visual effects. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D, with its 3D V-Cache and 8 cores / 16 threads, appears capable of feeding the RTX 5070 at this resolution, as evidenced by the high frame rates even on Low.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across all presets, but the relative gap between presets narrows. The Low preset falls from 244.9 FPS to 169 FPS, while Ultra falls from 106.8 FPS to 70.8 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU is becoming a more significant bottleneck, but the CPU still holds up well, preventing a more dramatic collapse.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's dominance is clear. The Ultra preset's 44.5 FPS and High's 54.9 FPS show the RTX 5070's 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are being pushed to their limits. The Low preset's 96.6 FPS still relies on the CPU's ability to process the game's logic, but the overall performance is heavily dictated by the GPU's pixel throughput. The data implies that for Rust, the RTX 5070 is the primary performance limiter at 4K, while at 1080p, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's strong single-thread performance (evidenced by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 1212 and passmark_single_thread score of 4430) ensures the GPU is well utilized.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 63.8 FPS. This setting balances visual quality with playability, as both High and Ultra fall below the target. The Low preset, while providing 96.6 FPS, would require a significant visual compromise.

At 2560x1440, all four presets exceed the 60 FPS threshold. The best settings are therefore Ultra, which achieves an average of 70.8 FPS. This allows users to experience the game at its highest visual fidelity while maintaining a comfortable frame rate cushion above the playability line.

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the best choice, delivering an average of 106.8 FPS. This is more than 40 FPS above the 60 FPS target, providing ample headroom for demanding scenes or background processes. The data indicates that at 1080p, the user can enable all visual features without concern for frame rate stability.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with the highest settings?

A: No, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset is 44.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset also falls short at 54.9 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 delivers an average of 70.8 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that still clears the 60 FPS target.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1080p?

A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 achieves 244.9 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 106.8 FPS. This represents a performance increase of roughly 138.1 FPS or about 2.3 times.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more at 1440p?

A: The data suggests a balance, but the GPU becomes more influential. The Low preset at 2560x1440 (169 FPS) is much closer to the 1080p Low result (244.9 FPS) than the 4K Low result (96.6 FPS), indicating that the CPU still has headroom while the GPU is scaling its workload.

Q: Is the Medium preset at 4K a viable option?

A: Yes, the Medium preset at 3840x2160 is the most demanding playable option, with an average of 63.8 FPS, just above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What are the differences in CPU performance between single-thread and multi-thread tasks?

A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D scores 1212 in 3dmark_single_thread and 10081 in 3dmark_16_threads. Its cinebench_r23_multicore score is 23230 versus 2080 for single-core, indicating strong scaling across its 8 cores.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 holds a comboRankInGame of 609 out of 3723 tested combinations. This places it in the top 16.4% of all tested hardware pairings for Rust. The rank reflects that while this is a high-end setup, there are numerous other combinations (likely with more powerful GPUs) that achieve higher average frame rates, particularly at 4K. The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 87 and the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 82 both indicate above-average performance relative to their individual categories, but the game's demands at 4K Ultra seem to be the limiting factor for a higher overall rank.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Rust effectively, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution and settings. According to the verdictByResolution data, at 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with the best settings being Ultra at 106.8 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, with Ultra being the best at 70.8 FPS. For 3840x2160, only the Low and Medium presets are playable, with Medium being the best at 63.8 FPS. The system is therefore a strong performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but 4K users must accept reduced visual settings to maintain smooth frame rates.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals from the CPU and GPU benchmark data provides insight into similar-performing hardware. The CPU's closest competitors, based on average benchmark scores, are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, with a score of 39603 (a 0.4% difference), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, with a score of 40048 (a -0.7% difference). These processors would likely deliver comparable frame rates in Rust, given the CPU's secondary role at higher resolutions.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with a score of 40318 (0.1% difference) and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 with a score of 40063 (0.8% difference). These GPUs would produce nearly identical FPS in most scenarios. It is important to note that these rival scores are from synthetic benchmarks like passmark_g3d, and real-world Rust performance could vary, but the data suggests these combinations would behave within a 2% margin of the RTX 5070. This information is useful for users who may find these alternative components available at different price points or in pre-built systems, as the performance difference in Rust would be minimal.