Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
259 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
137 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
219 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
94 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
129 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
56 FPS
5.6ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 39,768
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 56 73 87 129
1440p QHD 94 124 147 219
1080p Full HD 137 180 214 259

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 180
1920x1080 Low 259
1920x1080 Medium 214
1920x1080 Ultra 137
2560x1440 High 124
2560x1440 Low 219
2560x1440 Medium 147
2560x1440 Ultra 94
3840x2160 High 73
3840x2160 Low 129
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 Ultra 56

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers a dominant Rust experience, clearing the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution and preset combination tested. At 4K the combo still manages 73 FPS on High settings, while at 1080p it pushes past 250 FPS on Low, making this one of the fastest configurations in the database for this title. The data shows a system that is overkill for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the bottleneck shifting decisively toward the CPU at lower resolutions and toward the GPU only at 4K Ultra.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, with an average of 73 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 56 FPS, which sits below the playable threshold of 60 FPS, while Medium runs at 87 FPS and Low at 129 FPS. For 4K owners, High is the maximum visual quality that keeps the frame rate above the playability line, and the 17 FPS gap between High and Ultra suggests that the latter is only viable if the user accepts sub-60 performance.

At 2560x1440, every setting is playable, and Ultra delivers an average of 94 FPS. The jump from High (124 FPS) to Ultra (94 FPS) costs 30 FPS, but the result remains comfortably above 60. Medium runs at 147 FPS and Low at 219 FPS, so the 1440p Ultra setting is the clear choice for users wanting maximum fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. The 94 FPS average leaves enough headroom for demanding scenes, although the absence of a min FPS value for Ultra means frame drops cannot be assessed from this data.

At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best setting with an average of 137 FPS. High hits 180 FPS, Medium reaches 214 FPS, and Low tops out at 259 FPS. The 1080p Ultra result is 43 FPS higher than the 1440p Ultra result, showing how resolution scaling impacts the RTX 4090. Since all presets exceed 60 FPS by a wide margin, the only reason to drop below Ultra at 1080p is to chase higher refresh rates on a 240Hz or faster monitor.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals that the CPU plays a dominant role at 1080p, while the GPU becomes increasingly relevant as resolution rises. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low (259 FPS) and Ultra (137 FPS) is 122 FPS, a 47% reduction in performance when moving from the lightest to the heaviest preset. This wide spread indicates that the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is capable of feeding the RTX 4090 at very high frame rates, and the GPU is the limiting factor even at 1080p Ultra. The 8-core, 16-thread CPU with 96 MB of L3 cache provides the single-threaded muscle that Rust demands, as evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1212 and the PassMark single-thread score of 4430.

At 2560x1440, the scaling from Low (219 FPS) to Ultra (94 FPS) shows a 125 FPS drop, nearly identical to the 1080p spread. This suggests the CPU still has headroom at 1440p, since the frame rate difference between resolutions is moderate for the same preset. For example, High at 1440p (124 FPS) is only 56 FPS lower than High at 1080p (180 FPS), indicating that the GPU is starting to take on more work as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low runs at 129 FPS, which is less than half the 1080p Low result of 259 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 73 FPS (from 129 to 56), a smaller relative drop than at lower resolutions, because the GPU is saturated by the 8.3 million pixel workload. The RTX 4090's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 4K textures, but the raw compute demand of Rust at 4K Ultra exceeds what the card can deliver at 60 FPS. The data clearly shows a system where the CPU dominates at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K Ultra is the only scenario where the GPU is the sole performance limiter.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the full range of settings shows the RTX 4090's headroom. Low averages 259 FPS with no min or max recorded, Medium averages 214 FPS with a min of 182 and max of 246, High averages 180 FPS with no extremes, and Ultra averages 137 FPS with no extremes. The Medium preset provides the only complete frame time data, showing a 64 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, which indicates some scene-dependent variability.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 219 FPS, Medium averages 147 FPS with a min of 125 and max of 169, High averages 124 FPS, and Ultra averages 94 FPS. The Medium spread of 44 FPS is tighter than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU load is more consistent at higher resolutions. The step from High to Ultra at 1440p costs 30 FPS, which is a significant penalty for the extra visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, Low averages 129 FPS, Medium averages 87 FPS with a min of 74 and max of 100, High averages 73 FPS, and Ultra averages 56 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K has a 26 FPS spread between min and max, the smallest of any resolution for that setting, confirming that the GPU is the limiting factor and frame times are more stable. The 4K Ultra result of 56 FPS is the only sub-60 number in the entire dataset, and the 17 FPS difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is the largest relative drop among all settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals to the Ryzen 7 9800X3D in average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (0.4% higher score), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (0.7% lower score), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (0.7% higher score), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 (0.8% lower score). These four processors all sit within a 1.5% performance band, meaning any of them would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Rust when paired with the RTX 4090. The Ryzen 7 7700, in particular, is a desktop part like the 9800X3D and would likely show the same CPU-bound behavior at 1080p, though the 9800X3D's larger L3 cache gives it an edge in cache-sensitive workloads.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (0.3% higher score), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (2.5% lower score), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (2.9% higher score). The Arc Pro A60 is an exact match in average score, but its professional orientation and likely different driver behavior mean real-world Rust performance could vary. The Radeon Pro W6600M and PRO V710 are workstation cards that would likely struggle with the same game due to driver optimization differences, despite similar synthetic scores. None of these GPU rivals are consumer gaming parts, so the RTX 4090 remains the only sensible choice for Rust among this group.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 ranks 82nd out of 3723 tested combos in Rust, placing it in the top 2.2% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the CPU's 87th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU's 88th percentile among all GPUs, both of which are near the top of their respective charts. The 82nd rank means there are 81 other combinations that perform better in Rust, but given that this hardware represents the current flagship consumer CPU and the previous-generation flagship GPU, the only faster systems would likely feature the RTX 4090's successor or an even more extreme CPU configuration. The rank of 82 out of 3723 is consistent with a setup that delivers playable frame rates at every resolution, with only the 4K Ultra preset falling below 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Rust at 4K with maximum settings?

A: No. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 56 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 73 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra is the best setting at 2560x1440, with an average of 94 FPS. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) exceed the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution.

Q: How much faster is this combo at 1080p compared to 4K?

A: At 1080p Low, the average is 259 FPS, while at 4K Low the average drops to 129 FPS. This represents a 50% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck for this game?

A: The CPU is the primary bottleneck at 1080p and 1440p, as evidenced by the large frame rate differences between presets. At 4K Ultra, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with the only sub-60 FPS result in the dataset.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The only min FPS values recorded are for Medium settings: 182 FPS at 1080p, 125 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. No min FPS data is available for Low, High, or Ultra presets.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 82nd out of 3723 tested combinations in Rust, placing it in the top 2.2% of all systems benchmarked for this game.