Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

86%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
131 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
56 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
91 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
40 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
55 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
26 FPS
13.7ms Frame Time
21ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 39,768
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 33 34 55
1440p QHD 40 51 58 91
1080p Full HD 56 73 92 131

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 73
1920x1080 Low 131
1920x1080 Medium 92
1920x1080 Ultra 56
2560x1440 High 51
2560x1440 Low 91
2560x1440 Medium 58
2560x1440 Ultra 40
3840x2160 High 33
3840x2160 Low 55
3840x2160 Medium 34
3840x2160 Ultra 26

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a mixed performance profile in Rust, with clear 60 FPS capability at 1080p and 1440p, but a hard ceiling at 4K. The measured data indicates that this combination is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming, viable at 1440p with reduced settings, and not playable at 4K under any tested preset. The following analysis breaks down the exact performance characteristics, component roles, and comparative standing of this hardware pairing.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the data shows no settings preset achieves the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest average frame rate recorded is 54.5 FPS at Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS target. Consequently, there is no "best settings" recommendation for 4K, as even the lowest quality preset cannot maintain smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset at this resolution produces a 25.6 FPS average, while High and Medium yield 33.1 FPS and 34.3 FPS respectively, all firmly below the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only configuration that clears 60 FPS, delivering an average of 91 FPS. This is the best playable setting for this resolution. The Medium preset comes close with 58.4 FPS, but it remains below the 60 FPS threshold, meaning it would not provide a consistently smooth experience. High settings drop to 50.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39.9 FPS, neither of which is recommended for 60 FPS gameplay.

At 1920x1080, the situation improves substantially. The High preset achieves 73.3 FPS, making it the most demanding settings level that stays at or above 60 FPS. This is the recommended configuration for 1080p, as it balances visual quality with performance. The Medium preset reaches 92.1 FPS, and Low hits 130.8 FPS, both of which are also playable. However, the Ultra preset at 55.5 FPS falls just below the 60 FPS threshold, so it should be avoided if the goal is consistent 60 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a significant shift in component bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor. The frame rates across all presets are closely clustered between 25.6 FPS and 54.5 FPS, with the gap between Low and Ultra being only 28.9 FPS. This narrow range indicates that the Intel Arc B580 is saturated at this resolution, regardless of the CPU's capability. The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is not the constraint here; rather, the GPU's 12 GB of memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to push higher frame rates at 4K.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The difference between Low and Ultra widens to 51.1 FPS (from 91 FPS down to 39.9 FPS), showing that settings now have a more pronounced effect. This suggests the CPU is still providing enough headroom to feed the GPU, but the GPU is starting to struggle with higher graphical loads. The fact that Low hits 91 FPS while Medium drops to 58.4 FPS indicates a steep performance cliff between these presets, likely due to the GPU's shading units and texture units being overwhelmed by medium-tier workload.

At 1920x1080, the CPU role becomes more apparent. The spread from Low to Ultra is 75.3 FPS (130.8 down to 55.5 FPS), which is the largest relative difference among all resolutions. The high frame rates at Low and Medium (130.8 and 92.1 FPS) demonstrate that the Ryzen 7 9800X3D can drive the GPU effectively at lower resolutions, but the Ultra preset still manages only 55.5 FPS. This indicates that at 1080p, the GPU remains the limiting factor for high-end settings, but the CPU's strong single-thread performance (evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1212) helps maintain high frame rates when the GPU is not the bottleneck. Overall, the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in this pairing; the GPU dictates playability at all resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearestRivals data for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D's average benchmark score of 39768 places it within 1% of several alternatives. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 39603, which is 0.4% lower, making it a near-identical performer in synthetic tests. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40048, 0.7% higher, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485, 0.7% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 at 40081 is 0.8% higher. For gaming, these differences are negligible, meaning any of these CPUs would likely produce similar Rust frame rates when paired with the same GPU, assuming the GPU is the bottleneck.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 is closely matched by several rivals. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, just 0.2% higher, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, 0.6% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, 0.7% higher, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1.0% higher. These deltas are all within a 1.7% range, suggesting that swapping the B580 for any of these cards would result in very similar Rust performance. In practical terms, all of these GPUs would hit the same 4K wall and similar 1080p/1440p frame rates, with the RTX 3080 potentially offering a marginal edge in GPU-bound scenarios.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but only at specific resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combination of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Intel Arc B580 delivers playable performance across High, Medium, and Low presets, with the High preset being the best playable option at 73.3 FPS. The Ultra preset at 55.5 FPS is not recommended for 60 FPS gaming. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset clears 60 FPS, achieving 91 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the threshold. At 3840x2160, no preset is playable, with the best result being 54.5 FPS at Low. Therefore, the system is fully capable of smooth 1080p gaming, conditionally capable at 1440p with lower settings, and unsuitable for 4K gaming. Users targeting 4K would need a more powerful GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates are as follows: Ultra yields 25.6 FPS, High yields 33.1 FPS, Medium yields 34.3 FPS, and Low yields 54.5 FPS. No minimum or maximum frame rate data is available for this resolution, but the averages clearly indicate that all presets are below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the average frame rates are: Ultra at 39.9 FPS, High at 50.5 FPS, Medium at 58.4 FPS, and Low at 91 FPS. Only the Low preset exceeds 60 FPS. The jump from Medium to Low represents a 32.6 FPS increase, highlighting the significant performance cost of medium-tier settings.

At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are: Ultra at 55.5 FPS, High at 73.3 FPS, Medium at 92.1 FPS, and Low at 130.8 FPS. This resolution shows the widest range, with Low being 75.3 FPS faster than Ultra. The High preset's 73.3 FPS provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, while Ultra's 55.5 FPS is just shy of the target.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 4K with 60 FPS?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average frame rate recorded is 54.5 FPS at Low settings. All other presets (Medium 34.3 FPS, High 33.1 FPS, Ultra 25.6 FPS) are significantly lower, so 60 FPS is not achievable at 4K.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: The Low preset is the only one that clears 60 FPS, with an average of 91 FPS. Medium comes close at 58.4 FPS but does not meet the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 1080p?

A: No. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 55.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset at 73.3 FPS is the highest playable setting.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to the RTX 3080 in this game?

A: The nearestRivals data shows the RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172, which is 0.7% higher than the B580's 23021. This delta is minor, so Rust performance with either GPU would be very similar, though the RTX 3080 might edge out slightly in GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: Does the CPU become a bottleneck at any resolution?

A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1212) and 8-core/16-thread configuration appear sufficient, as frame rates scale primarily with GPU load across resolutions and presets.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low averages 130.8 FPS while Ultra averages 55.5 FPS, a difference of 75.3 FPS. This shows the substantial graphical load of the Ultra preset on the GPU.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database for Rust, this combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2845 out of 3723 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle percentile of all tested systems, which is consistent with the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 68 and the CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 87. The CPU is a top-tier performer, but the GPU holds the pairing back, particularly at higher resolutions. The rank of 2845 indicates that while the system is functional for 1080p and 1440p gaming, it is outperformed by a majority of other tested configurations in the database. This ranking is likely driven by the GPU's inability to maintain 60 FPS at 4K and its limitations at 1440p Medium and above. For users prioritizing high-resolution gaming, this combo is not competitive; for 1080p play, it sits comfortably within playable territory but does not stand out among its peers.