Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

82%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
152 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
65 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
106 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
43 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
63 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
26 FPS
11.5ms Frame Time
17ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 37,943
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 20,282

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 37 39 63
1440p QHD 43 61 70 106
1080p Full HD 65 87 102 152

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 87
1920x1080 Low 152
1920x1080 Medium 102
1920x1080 Ultra 65
2560x1440 High 61
2560x1440 Low 106
2560x1440 Medium 70
2560x1440 Ultra 43
3840x2160 High 37
3840x2160 Low 63
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 26

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination delivers a playable experience in Rust, but the margin for error depends heavily on resolution. The recorded data shows a system that handles 1080p with ease, manages 1440p with some compromises, and struggles at 4K except on the lowest settings. This pairing ranks 2155th out of 3723 tested combinations in the database, placing it in the upper-middle tier for this specific title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system produces its strongest results. On Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 151.7 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium settings still deliver a comfortable 102.3 FPS average. High settings drop to 86.9 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain a respectable 64.5 FPS average. Every preset at 1080p clears the playable threshold, with the gap between Low and Ultra representing a 57.3% performance reduction.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance curve shifts downward noticeably. Low settings produce 106.4 FPS average, which remains strong. Medium settings come in at 70.2 FPS, while High settings barely clear the 60 FPS mark with 60.9 FPS average. Ultra settings fall below the threshold at 42.8 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent 29.9% to 33.7% performance loss across matching presets, indicating that pixel count has a significant impact on this GPU.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings deliver 63.2 FPS average, just above the threshold. Medium settings drop to 39.1 FPS, High settings to 36.7 FPS, and Ultra settings to 26.1 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is a 58.7% reduction, similar in magnitude to the 1080p spread but from a much lower starting point. The data shows that only the lowest preset at 4K is viable, and even then with a narrow margin.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 64.5 FPS. This is the best visual quality the system can drive at this resolution while maintaining playability. The 4.5 FPS buffer above the threshold is slim, but the average indicates that most scenes will remain fluid.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, averaging 60.9 FPS. Medium settings run faster at 70.2 FPS, but High offers superior visual fidelity while still clearing the threshold. Ultra settings at 42.8 FPS are not playable, so High represents the ceiling for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings achieve playability, with an average of 63.2 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 40 FPS, which is insufficient for a smooth experience. The data indicates that 4K gaming with this hardware requires significant visual compromises, and even then the frame rate is barely above the threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results show that Rust scales more aggressively with resolution than with preset changes, which highlights the GPU as the primary performance limiter at higher resolutions. The 1080p to 1440p transition reduces frame rates by roughly 30% across all presets, while the 1440p to 4K transition causes a 40.5% drop on Low settings and a 39.9% drop on High settings. This consistent scaling pattern suggests that the RTX 2070 SUPER is the bottleneck as pixel count increases.

At 1080p, the CPU has more room to demonstrate its capabilities. The Ryzen 7 9700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides enough headroom that even Ultra settings at 64.5 FPS do not appear CPU-bound. The 151.7 FPS result on Low settings indicates that the processor can feed the GPU effectively at high frame rates.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The sharp decline from Medium to Ultra at 1440p, from 70.2 FPS to 42.8 FPS, is characteristic of a graphics card reaching its limits rather than a CPU constraint. Similarly, at 4K, the difference between Low and Medium is a 38.1% drop, which is a larger proportional loss than seen at lower resolutions, reinforcing that the GPU is the limiting component.

The CPU's benchmark scores support this interpretation. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485 and single-core score of 2211 place it well above average, and its 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs suggests it is not a weak link. The GPU, by contrast, sits at the 65th percentile, indicating that it is the more modest component in this pairing.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37943, which places it very close to several other processors. The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the AMD chip. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, also 0.1% behind. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, 0.3% behind, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, 0.4% behind. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver near-identical frame rates in Rust, as the differences are well within measurement noise.

For the GPU, the RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 20282. The nearest rivals are all within 1.5% of this figure. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, which is 1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 1.2% higher. The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, 1.3% higher, and the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, 1.5% higher. These alternatives would produce very similar frame rates in Rust, with at most a few frames per second difference at any given setting.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Rust at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the data shows an average of 64.5 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 60.9 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that remains playable. Ultra settings drop to 42.8 FPS, which is not sufficient.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: Only on Low settings, which average 63.2 FPS at 3840x2160. Medium settings fall to 39.1 FPS, and higher presets are well below the threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943 on average, within 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-14901E, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Intel Core 5 211E, and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132.

Q: What GPU alternatives perform similarly?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, RTX 3070 Mobile, Intel Arc B570, and Intel Arc A750 all score within 1.5% of the RTX 2070 SUPER's average benchmark score.

Q: Does the system have more CPU or GPU headroom?

A: The CPU is the stronger component, ranking in the 86th percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 65th percentile. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

The Verdict

This system can run Rust, but the playable range is clearly defined by the verdict data. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra being the best playable option at 64.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, High settings are the ceiling at 60.9 FPS, while Low and Medium also remain playable. At 3840x2160, only Low settings work, averaging 63.2 FPS. The system is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it offers smooth performance across the board, and it can handle 1440p with moderate settings. 4K gaming is technically possible but requires the lowest preset, leaving little room for visual quality. For players prioritizing high frame rates, 1080p Low at 151.7 FPS is the standout option. For those who want the best visuals, 1080p Ultra at 64.5 FPS is the recommended balance.