Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
276 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
140 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
224 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
97 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
132 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
57 FPS
5.4ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 75 89 132
1440p QHD 97 127 150 224
1080p Full HD 140 185 219 276

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 185
1920x1080 Low 276
1920x1080 Medium 219
1920x1080 Ultra 140
2560x1440 High 127
2560x1440 Low 224
2560x1440 Medium 150
2560x1440 Ultra 97
3840x2160 High 75
3840x2160 Low 132
3840x2160 Medium 89
3840x2160 Ultra 57

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers a benchmark profile for Rust that is heavily skewed toward resolution-dependent performance. At 1920x1080, the combination produces extremely high frame rates, while 4K Ultra settings push the system to its limits, falling just short of the 60 FPS threshold. The data indicates a system where the CPU is the limiting factor at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo in Rust?

A: The highest recorded average is 276 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only measured configuration that exceeds 270 FPS, highlighting the CPU's capability to drive very high frame rates when GPU load is minimal.

Q: At which resolution does the system fail to maintain 60 FPS?

A: Only at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, where the average FPS drops to 57. All other tested configurations at 4K, 1440p, and 1080p stay above the 60 FPS playable threshold, according to the measured data.

Q: How much faster is 1080p Low compared to 4K Ultra?

A: The 1080p Low average of 276 FPS is roughly 4.84 times higher than the 4K Ultra average of 57 FPS. This massive scaling gap underscores how resolution and preset changes dramatically alter the performance envelope for Rust.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between High and Ultra settings at 2560x1440?

A: High settings produce an average of 127 FPS, while Ultra settings yield 97 FPS. The 30 FPS difference (a 23.6% drop) shows that the Ultra preset imposes a significant additional load at 1440p, though both remain well above the playability threshold.

Q: Does the RTX 5090's benchmark percentile align with its in-game performance ranking?

A: The GPU holds a 92nd percentile rank among all GPUs, and the combo ranks 40th out of 3723 tested combinations in Rust. This top-tier positioning is consistent with the high frame rates observed, though the CPU's 94th percentile rank suggests a balanced pairing.

Q: Which preset at 3840x2160 provides the closest to 60 FPS without going below?

A: Medium settings at 4K deliver an average of 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 102 FPS. This is the lowest preset that stays comfortably above 60 FPS, while High at 75 FPS is the best visually demanding option that still clears the threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data for Rust reveals a clear division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, with the balance shifting based on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the CPU emerges as the dominant factor. The jump from Low to Ultra settings produces a frame rate drop from 276 FPS to 140 FPS, yet even at Ultra the system sustains 140 FPS. This suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than the GPU can render at lower resolutions, but the scaling from Low to Ultra indicates the GPU is still heavily utilized. The fact that 1080p Low (276 FPS) is only slightly higher than 1440p Low (224 FPS) — a 19% reduction — points to the CPU being the primary constraint at these settings, as the GPU has ample headroom.

At 2560x1440, the balance begins to shift toward the GPU. The spread between Low (224 FPS) and Ultra (97 FPS) widens compared to 1080p, with the Ultra preset showing a 56.7% reduction from Low. This indicates that as resolution increases, the GPU's workload grows faster than the CPU's, making the RTX 5090 more influential in determining final performance. However, the 1440p High average of 127 FPS is still extremely high, implying that neither component is a hard bottleneck at this resolution.

The 3840x2160 results confirm the GPU's dominance at high resolution. The Low preset at 4K (132 FPS) is dramatically lower than 1440p Low (224 FPS) — a 41% drop — while the CPU's workload remains relatively constant. This steep decline is attributable to the GPU's pixel throughput limits. The Ultra preset at 4K (57 FPS) falls below the 60 FPS threshold, while Medium (89 FPS) and High (75 FPS) remain playable. The transition from 1440p Ultra (97 FPS) to 4K Ultra (57 FPS) represents a 41.2% performance loss, a figure that aligns with the increased pixel count rather than any CPU limitation. The data shows that at 4K, the RTX 5090's rendering capabilities are the deciding factor, with the Ryzen 7 9700F providing sufficient frame pacing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces its highest frame rates across all presets. Low settings yield an average of 276 FPS, while Medium delivers 219 FPS with a minimum of 186 FPS and a maximum of 251 FPS. High settings reach 185 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 140 FPS average. The spread from Low to Ultra is 136 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a substantial rendering cost even at 1080p. All configurations remain far above the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest recorded minimum being 186 FPS at Medium.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a clearer step-down pattern. Low settings average 224 FPS, Medium produces 150 FPS (with a minimum of 128 FPS and maximum of 173 FPS), High averages 127 FPS, and Ultra averages 97 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 23 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 30 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset is the most demanding step. The minimum of 128 FPS at Medium confirms that even the lowest moments stay well above playability.

At 3840x2160, performance compresses significantly. Low settings average 132 FPS, Medium averages 89 FPS (with a minimum of 76 FPS and maximum of 102 FPS), High averages 75 FPS, and Ultra averages 57 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is 43 FPS, from Medium to High is 14 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 18 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only configuration below 60 FPS, and the Medium minimum of 76 FPS shows that even the least favorable moments at that preset remain playable. The absence of min/max data for Low, High, and Ultra at 4K limits the analysis to averages, but the pattern is consistent with GPU-bound scaling.

The Verdict

The data indicates that this PC can run Rust with high confidence across most configurations. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 140 FPS. The verdict data confirms that 1080p Ultra is the best playable setting, delivering 140 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same is true: all presets exceed 60 FPS, and Ultra averages 97 FPS, making it the recommended setting. At 3840x2160, the system maintains playability at Low (132 FPS), Medium (89 FPS), and High (75 FPS), but Ultra falls short with an average of 57 FPS. The verdictByResolution data lists High as the best 4K setting, with 75 FPS average.

The overall picture is that this combination is overqualified for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Rust, providing significant headroom above the 60 FPS target. At 4K, it is a high-refresh capable system for most presets, but the Ultra preset is the sole exception. Players seeking the highest visual fidelity at 4K would need to accept a frame rate below the playable threshold, while those prioritizing smoothness can use High settings with a 75 FPS average. The system's ranking of 40th out of 3723 tested combinations underscores its elite status.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, offer similar computational headroom. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 7 9700F's 69996 average. The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163, just 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 (0.7% lower) and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355 (0.9% lower). These deltas are minimal, meaning any of these CPUs would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios like Rust at low resolutions. The Ryzen 7 9700F's 94th percentile rank places it alongside these high-end desktop and mobile parts, though the 7940HX is a laptop-class chip.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5090's nearest rivals are a mixed group. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79605, 0.3% higher than the RTX 5090's 79842 average, while the P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79396 (0.6% lower). The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940 (1.1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959 (1.4% higher). These deltas are all within 1.5%, suggesting that in GPU-bound scenarios at 4K Ultra, these alternatives would perform within a few FPS of each other. However, the RTX 5090's 32 GB memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are not reflected in these rival scores, so texture-heavy scenes in Rust may favor the 5090 more than the raw scores imply.

For Rust specifically, the CPU rivals are likely to be the more relevant comparison, as the game's simulation and server-side logic can be CPU-intensive. The 0.2% to 0.9% delta range means that swapping the Ryzen 7 9700F for a Ryzen 9 7950X would change frame rates by less than 1% in most scenarios. Similarly, the GPU rivals would produce near-identical results at 4K, with the 1.4% higher Pro Vega 64X potentially adding a couple of FPS to the 57 FPS Ultra average, though still not reaching 60 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 140 FPS. This is the highest quality option available, and the measured average is more than double the playable threshold, providing substantial headroom for demanding moments. At 2560x1440, Ultra also qualifies, averaging 97 FPS. The 43 FPS difference between 1080p Ultra and 1440p Ultra reflects the added pixel load, but both remain comfortably playable. At 3840x2160, High is the best setting that clears 60 FPS, with an average of 75 FPS. Ultra at 4K averages 57 FPS and is therefore excluded. Medium at 4K (89 FPS) is a fallback option for those who prefer smoother motion over visual quality, but High offers the best balance of fidelity and performance.

The data shows that as resolution increases, the maximum playable preset steps down from Ultra to High. This progression is consistent with the GPU becoming the limiting factor at higher pixel counts. The 4K High average of 75 FPS is still well above the threshold, offering a 25% margin over 60 FPS, which suggests that even demanding scenes with many players or complex structures are unlikely to cause sustained drops below playability.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 ranks 40th out of 3723 tested configurations in Rust, placing it in the top 1.1% of all combos. This ranking reflects the system's ability to sustain high frame rates across most resolutions and presets, with the only exception being 4K Ultra. The top-tier position is corroborated by the individual component percentiles: the CPU ranks in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU ranks in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. The slight discrepancy between the combo's 40th rank and the component percentiles suggests that Rust's performance profile rewards CPU strength slightly more than GPU strength, given that the CPU is the limiting factor at lower resolutions.

The ranking also implies that there are 39 other tested combinations that perform better, likely featuring even higher-end CPUs or more specialized configurations. However, the 40th rank out of 3723 means this system outperforms the vast majority of tested hardware in Rust. The measured FPS data confirms this standing: at 1080p Ultra, the 140 FPS average is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, and even at 4K High, the 75 FPS average provides a smooth experience. This combo is positioned as a high-end solution that only falters at the absolute maximum settings at 4K, a limitation that is shared by nearly all systems given the game's demanding nature at that resolution.