Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Rust
Survival 2018

Rust

95%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
66 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
29 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
46 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
20 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
27 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
12 FPS
26.3ms Frame Time
39ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,463
Your CPU 69,996
Graphics Card
Required 28,194
Your GPU 28,766

Recommendations

Optimize Settings

Try lowering shadows and anti-aliasing for better FPS.

GPU Upgrade

A better graphics card would significantly improve performance.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 12 15 18 27
1440p QHD 20 26 31 46
1080p Full HD 29 38 44 66

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 38
1920x1080 Low 66
1920x1080 Medium 44
1920x1080 Ultra 29
2560x1440 High 26
2560x1440 Low 46
2560x1440 Medium 31
2560x1440 Ultra 20
3840x2160 High 15
3840x2160 Low 27
3840x2160 Medium 18
3840x2160 Ultra 12

Performance Analysis: Rust on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 570 delivers a playable Rust experience only at 1080p with Low settings. At 1440p and 4K, the combination fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold at any preset. The recorded data shows this is a bottom-tier pairing for Rust, ranking 3553 out of 3723 tested combinations, with the GPU acting as the primary performance limiter across all resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Rust at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: No. The highest recorded average at 3840x2160 is 27 FPS on Low settings. High, Medium, and Ultra presets produce 15, 18, and 12 FPS respectively, all far below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming?

A: The only playable configuration is Low settings, which delivers 66 FPS average at 1920x1080. Medium, High, and Ultra presets at this resolution yield 44, 38, and 29 FPS, all below 60 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996 in the average benchmark. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-14700KF, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700K. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile of all tested processors.

Q: What GPU performance level does the RX 570 match?

A: The RX 570 averages 28766 in benchmarks. It is 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M295X, 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 470, and 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000. It ranks in the 74th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Is there any resolution where Ultra settings are playable?

A: No. At 1920x1080, Ultra produces 29 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra produces 20 FPS. At 3840x2160, Ultra produces 12 FPS. None of these approach the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Which component bottlenecks more in Rust with this combo?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU is in the 94th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 74th percentile. The frame rates drop sharply with resolution increases, which is characteristic of GPU-bound performance.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU each have close rivals that would produce nearly identical results in Rust. On the processor side, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is the nearest match, scoring 69875 against the Ryzen 7 9700F's 69996, a difference of just 0.2%. The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163, also essentially identical. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel Core i7-14700K are 0.7% and 0.9% away respectively. Any of these CPUs would yield the same frame rates when paired with the RX 570, as the GPU dominates performance in this game.

For the graphics card, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M is the closest rival with an average score of 28874 versus the RX 570's 28766, a 0.4% gap. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28996, 0.8% higher, while the AMD Radeon R9 M295X scores 28580, 0.7% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 is 1.2% behind. Swapping the RX 570 for any of these would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Rust at the tested resolutions and presets.

The practical implication is that this combination sits in a performance cluster where small benchmark deltas translate to no meaningful FPS differences. Users with any of these alternative CPUs or GPUs should expect the same playability profile: 1080p Low at roughly 66 FPS, with all higher presets and resolutions falling short of 60 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 27 FPS, followed by Medium at 18 FPS, High at 15 FPS, and Ultra at 12 FPS. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS does not exist at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the situation is identical in outcome. Low settings produce 46 FPS, Medium produces 31 FPS, High produces 26 FPS, and Ultra produces 20 FPS. No configuration clears the 60 FPS threshold, so there is no recommended preset.

At 1920x1080, Low settings deliver 66 FPS average, which is the only preset that meets the playable threshold. Medium runs at 44 FPS, High at 38 FPS, and Ultra at 29 FPS. The best playable setting is Low, with a recorded average of 66 FPS.

The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in resolution costs roughly half the frame rate. For example, Low settings drop from 66 FPS at 1080p to 46 FPS at 1440p, then to 27 FPS at 4K. Similarly, Medium drops from 44 to 31 to 18 FPS across the same resolutions.

The Verdict

This PC can run Rust, but only under strict conditions. The verdict by resolution is clear: 3840x2160 has no playable settings, 2560x1440 has no playable settings, and 1920x1080 has exactly one playable setting, Low, which averages 66 FPS.

At 1080p, the combination clears the 60 FPS threshold with Low settings, but the margin is thin. The recorded average of 66 FPS is only 10% above the playable threshold. The minimum FPS is not recorded for the Low preset, so there is some uncertainty about frame pacing, but the average is sufficient for a playable experience.

At 1440p, the best case is Low at 46 FPS, which is 14 FPS below the threshold. This is not a playable experience for smooth gameplay. At 4K, the best case is Low at 27 FPS, which is less than half the required frame rate.

The overall ranking reinforces this assessment. This combo ranks 3553 out of 3723 tested combinations for Rust, placing it in the bottom 5% of all tested hardware pairings. The data indicates this is a legacy GPU paired with a modern CPU, and the GPU severely limits the experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear division of labor. The Ryzen 7 9700F is a high-end processor, ranking in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The RX 570 is a mid-range GPU from an older generation, ranking in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. For Rust, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting factor.

Evidence comes from the resolution scaling. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 66 FPS at 1080p to 46 FPS at 1440p, a 30% reduction, then to 27 FPS at 4K, another 41% reduction. This steep decline with resolution is the signature of GPU-bound performance. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would stay relatively flat as resolution increases, since the CPU work per frame stays constant.

The preset scaling at a fixed resolution tells the same story. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium drops the average from 66 to 44 FPS, a 33% reduction. Low to High drops to 38 FPS, and Low to Ultra drops to 29 FPS, a 56% reduction. These large drops from preset changes are also characteristic of GPU limits, as higher presets increase pixel and shader workload.

The CPU's role is to keep up with the GPU's demands, and it does so easily. The Ryzen 7 9700F has 8 cores and 16 threads with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its average benchmark score of 69996 places it near the top of the database. The data suggests the CPU is never the limiting factor in this pairing, as the GPU saturates well before the CPU reaches its capacity.

At 1080p Low, the system achieves 66 FPS, which is likely close to the GPU's maximum output. At higher resolutions, the GPU falls further behind. The CPU would be capable of much higher frame rates if paired with a stronger GPU, but with the RX 570, its performance headroom is unused.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and the AMD Radeon RX 570 ranks 3553 out of 3723 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the bottom 4.6% of all tested hardware configurations. The rank reflects the GPU's age and performance class rather than the CPU's capability.

The CPU alone is a top-tier part. It sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69996. The GPU alone sits in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28766. The combination ranks far lower than either component's individual percentile suggests, which indicates that the GPU is the dominant factor in Rust performance.

The recorded frame rates confirm this rank. At 1080p, the only playable preset is Low at 66 FPS. Most modern gaming PCs would be expected to handle Medium or High presets at 60 FPS or better. This combo falls short of that expectation. At 1440p and 4K, it fails entirely.

The rank of 3553 out of 3723 means that 93% of tested combos perform better in Rust. This is a clear signal that the RX 570 is the weak link. Users with this CPU should consider a significantly more powerful GPU to unlock the CPU's potential. The Ryzen 7 9700F is capable of much higher frame rates, but the RX 570 cannot deliver them.

For the specific game of Rust, the data shows that the CPU is not a meaningful contributor to the performance ceiling. The frame rates are entirely dictated by the GPU's capabilities. The rank in the database reflects this, as the combo sits near the bottom despite having a top-tier CPU.